语言词与话语词

语言词和话语词有区别 ,应该加以区别 ,其重要区别是语言词意义的一般性和语话词意义的具体性或特指性、语言词意义的多重性和话语词意义的确定性、语言词意义的规约性和话语词意义的开放性等。区分语言词和话语词主要在词汇学、词典学、语法学以及修辞学领域有现实意义。     

国内马克思主义哲学体系研究综述

马克思主义哲学的体系问题是中国马克思主义哲学研究的一个重要问题。历史地看,国内对马克思主义哲学体系的认识、理解和研究经历了一个发展演变的过程。改革开放以来,针对体系重建的争论不仅有其现实的实践的背景,也有其深远的历史原因。     

规范化法学教育实习基地的改革与完善

法学教育作为连接理论与实践的桥梁,其现状并不能满足当前法治实践的基本需求,折射出有的教育模式有偏离实践教育基本方向的重大迷失。基于客观存在的现实弊端,依托政法院校的天然优势,建立法学实习基地已然成为弥补这一缺失的共同认识。然而遗憾的是,尽管法学教育实习基地的建设已经蔚为壮观,但是在数量趋增的背后却较难看到高质量实践教育的成效。因此,对现有法学教育实习基地进行充分利用与资源挖掘,在实习基地与政法院校之间设置更为灵活有效的沟通衔接机制,根据法学学科的不同特点来打造专业化法学实习基地,通过规范化重塑来唤醒实习基地的应有机能则是未来完善的重心所在。     

穿梭于“教室”与“基地”之间——以河南司法警官职业学院社区矫正实习实训基地建设为例

社区矫正工作的特性使法律事务(社区矫正)专业对实习实训基地具有极强的依赖性。从发挥实践性教学的效率和效益出发,应将实习和实训的基地建设合二为一。实习实训基地建设要真正体现在职业岗位流程、职业环境、职业标准、岗位制度、岗位管理及岗位需求上的真实性。因此,要科学制定建设方案、悉心培育实习实训指导教师队伍、构建有效管理机制、实施多元绩效评估体系等,打造一流的实习实训基地,以发挥其多元化的服务功能。     

高职院校思想政治理论课实践教学模式探析——以思想与艺术结合为分析视角

将思想和艺术相结合,探寻思想政治理论课实践教学新模式对提高思政课教学质量,增强思想政治教育实效性具有重要意义。当前高职院校思想政治理论课实践教学模式有待于拓展,而把各种艺术手段运用到高职院校思政课实践教学中则具有可行性和必要性,思想政治理论课艺术实践教学具有美育功能、认知功能和教育功能。     

Asia's competing multilateral initiatives: quality versus quantity

East Asia has many distinctive features that set it apart from other comparable regions, not least attitudes to regional development and cooperation. Despite a growing number of regional initiatives in East Asia, however, they are generally distinguished by their ineffectiveness. It is entirely possible that ‘institutional balancing’, like its more well-known power balancing counterpart, is designed not to facilitate but to prevent something from happening. The sort of ‘multilateralism 1.0’ developed by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has a lot to answer for in this regard: having established its own pattern of institutional effectiveness ASEAN's ‘leadership’ has caused it to be replicated under the new wave of ‘multilateralism 2.0’. Consequently, I suggest that not only is China very comfortable with the idea of a rather feeble and ineffective institutional architecture, but the USA is also unlikely to do anything to change this picture, especially under a Trump administration that is highly skeptical about the efficacy of multilateral institutions at the best of times.     

“党性与人民性相统一”的三重逻辑论析

中国共产党自成立以来,其全部理论和实践都充分证明,党性和人民性是统一的、一致的。党性与人民性相统一,既是我们党开展各项工作的基本原则,又是在鲜活实践中提炼出的重大理论观点,也是未来推动工作的根本遵循,具有重要的历史价值、理论价值和实践价值。深刻理解和科学把握党性与人民性相统一的历史逻辑、理论逻辑、实践逻辑,辨析两者关系、阐述价值意蕴、探究现实路径,为我们全面正确理解和把握它们的关系提供了依据、拓展了思路、指明了方向,能够帮助我们纠正错误认识、澄清理论纷争、开创崭新局面。     

马克思主义妇女理论的文本解读与现实启示

妇女理论是马克思唯物史观的重要部分。通过对《德意志意识形态》和《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》进行文本解读,有助于在历史唯物主义的根基上把握马克思主义妇女理论的核心,即劳动分工这把钥匙。理论文本上的深入剖析对思考现实社会中的妇女解放命题具有重要启示:妇女解放需要在历史前进的逻辑中前进,以生产力的发展、历史的进步为基础;妇女参与社会生产劳动、实现经济独立,是提升自身地位的前提;在当前社会进步已为妇女解放提供社会土壤的基础上,观念意识的变革重塑对妇女解放具有重要意义。     

消费扶贫:政策、理论与实践

消费扶贫对于激发贫困群体的主体性、吸引社会力量参与精准扶贫、推动贫困地区产业结构调整等均有积极意义。在国务院专门出台文件推动的情况下,应进一步明晰消费扶贫的基本内涵和形成机理,注重解决有产无量、有品不优、体验不美、持续不久等问题,不断推动消费扶贫健康发展。     

The Hurried Justification of Sanctions

In this paper I try to see how the Derridean aporias of the law of the urgency of legal decisions (the law interrupts the input of knowledge in the decision-making process) and the épokhè of the rule (justice can never be done in the present) are revealed in the context of the justification of sanctions. I argue that sanctions can only be justified in a purposive manner in the last instance. They can only be means to an end of punishment which has been opted for, and which can be justified on grounds of principles, or an authoritative calculation of incommensurable entities. I argue against theories, which advocate the internal connection of law and morality, because if such a connection could be established, the aporia of the hurried and unjustified action would obviously disappear. In particular my target is discourse theory as formulated mainly by Robert Alexy with his Sonderfallthese(Special Case Thesis). My objection is that, because of their instrumental nature, sanctions cannot be justified on moral grounds. I also consider some objections that could be raised from Klaus Günther's theory of appropriateness and Habermas' distinction between the moral, ethical and pragmatic employments of practical reason. I am argue that the former, which would become relevant at the stage of application, that is sentencing, does not resolve the justificatory problem of sanctions, and the latter confirms rather than falsifies my claim that punishment can never be said to be just.