国家干预家庭暴力的限度研究

鉴于家庭自治的局限性和私权与公共利益保护的迫切需要,国家干预家庭暴力有其必要性和正当性。目前国家干预家庭暴力的态度积极,但是部分干预方式差强人意。国家干预家庭暴力必须保证婚姻家庭内部规则的有效运行,应当秉承切忌法律万能论、尊重家庭自治和适当注意的基本原则,其具体干预方式包括但不限于维持家庭内部秩序、建立家庭自治的约束机制和适当增加强制性措施等。作为国家干预家庭暴力的典型例证,《反家庭暴力法》必须尊重家庭内部规则,建立家庭自治的约束机制,确保国家干预家庭暴力的适时性和有限性,这是《反家庭暴力法》有效运行的基本途径。     

五级机制:高校心理危机预防干预工作的创新

心理危机预防干预是以人为本教育思想的体现,是学校人才培养的重要任务。五级机制是高校心理危机预防干预工作的创新,它体现了全体教职员工对学生生命的全面关怀,可以有效地促进学生心理健康,守护学生生命安全。     

公众共用物开发利用法律规制的困境与破解

公众共用物是人类社会得以持续发展的物质源泉和基本资源。环境资源等公众共用物可被不特定多数人非排他性使用,但自由主义导致的个人利益至上,价值观缺陷导致的狭隘利益至上,使得公众因共用引发个体私人利益与公众公共利益之间的冲突,产生公众共用物的"公用悲剧"。针对公用缺陷,经典解决方案侧重通过产权化将具有非排他性的共用物转变为具有排他性的物权客体。由于对公众共用物过度或不当产权化,因此经典解决方案偏离了最初的设想,异化为公众共用物"私用悲剧"。公众共用物公用缺陷和私用缺陷是一个硬币的两面,为统筹解决这两种问题,对公众共用物的开发利用进行规制,需要明确公众共用物的法律地位,确认其共用权利性质,更新理念并明确公众共用物开发利用的原则,明晰公众共用物产权,明确并完善公众共用物调整方式。     

Situating private equity capital in the land grab debate

This paper examines the private equity investment landscape in African land and agriculture markets by exploring two underlying questions: (1) Within the global land grab trend, how is power manifested for private equity investors? and (2) What are the development implications of private equity-backed investments? The essay begins with an overview of the recent rise of private equity in African land markets. It then analyzes the power relations embedded in this trend, particularly exploring the issues of information asymmetry and ‘creative destruction’ inherent in private equity finance, and their implications for governance and labour. Finally, the paper examines the power dynamics that characterize the relatively new relationship between private equity groups and development finance. Drawing on several illustrations of the World Bank Group's involvement in private equity-backed land investments, this paper demonstrates how the overlapping interests between development finance and private equity groups, in part, explain private equity's presence in emerging farmland markets.     

The Role of Civic Engagement in Trisectoral Governance Approaches as Factors for Success in East German Municipalities

The demographic diminution and the special economic situation in the East necessitate flexible strategies that make use of all available on-site resources. This includes taking into account economic concerns in governmental and developmental strategies for the public sector as well as improved integration of ‘active citizens’, for whom the government must provide adequate basic parameters in order to assure lasting and effective participation. In this context, the following article presents the findings of a study on East German municipalities that clarifies the obstacles and specific potentials of a stronger cooperation between the various societal sectors that is characterised by trisectoral governance.     

征地拆迁中的利益博弈与法律秩序

在加快经济发展过程中,土地资源溢价带来了暴利,利益重组中强者势力失控、弱者利益保护不足。利益争夺以法权模糊化为掩盖,政府角色错位为分利一方,商业利益披上公共利益的外衣,住户暴利心理绑架了生存利益,国家所有权吞没了其他物权,正式程序游戏化运用。政府与开发商结盟,开发商滥用私暴力,住户回归自力救济,各方利益行动选择共同虚置了法律制度。只有回归法治理性,明晰利益关系,完善制度规则,才能重建法律秩序。     

透视"公共"的概念--"公""私"关系分析

理解"公共"的涵义并分析其在理论与实践中的发展应该成为研究公共政策的起点.本文以公私关系的分析为切入点,从市场理性、公共行政、公共物品、公共职能等多角度透视了"公共"的概念,对公共的实质性内涵进行了分析和阐述.     

发展私营经济是振兴东北老工业基地的重要抉择

振兴东北老工业基地离不开多种经济成分并存的经济制度 ,特别是离不开私营经济的支持。在非公有制经济中 ,私营经济极具代表性和典型性 ,对国企改革具有举足轻重的作用。发展私营经济 ,坚持和完善基本经济制度 ,是振兴东北老工业基地的重要抉择     

论地理标志权的性质

地理标志是WTO多哈回合谈判中最具争议性的知识产权议题之一。各国对地理标志采取了不同的立法保护方式,并形成了通过商标法保护地理标志和制定地理标志专门法的两种主要保护模式。与此同时,我国学术界针对当前我国对地理标志同时采用商标法和专门立法两种保护模式的做法,也有诸多争议。这些情况都充分表明,各国政府以及学术界对地理标志相关权利及其保护客体的性质尚无统一的认识。从学者提出的各种观点来看,关于地理标志的性质主要存在着公权利说,私权利说和集体权利说等几种学说。从地理标志权的权能归属以及公权与私权的划分标准等角度分析,地理标志权在本质上具有私权属性,并为特定地理区域内合格的生产者所共有。我国的地理标志制度在进一步完善的过程中应当更鲜明地体现地理标志权的私权属性,从而充分发挥地理标志制度的经济效益。     

Mind the Gap: Lacunae in the International Legal Framework Governing Private Military and Security Companies

Abstract

This article examines the common claim that there are gaps in international law that undermine accountability of private military and security companies. A multi-actor analysis examines this question in relation to the commission of international crimes, violations of fundamental human rights, and ordinary crimes. Without this critical first step of identifying specific deficiencies in international law, the debate about how to enhance accountability within this sector is likely to be misguided at best.