Corporatism packaged in pluralist ideology: the case of Slovenia

Corporatism has been an influential doctrine in the Slovenian polity since its beginning. After the onset of democratization in the early 1990s, its influence remains strong. Forms of corporatism are embodied in the National Council as the second chamber of parliament, in the chamber system, the system of social partnership and the RTVS (Public Television of Slovenia) Council. It is also present in certain socio-political priorities such as a higher value being placed on partnership over competition, on fairness over human rights, on community over individualism. Social pluralism has always been a part of Slovenian public life. Political pluralism emerged at the end of the 19th century and was never fully developed. There has always been a strong inclination in the political life of Slovenia to organize around interest groups and editorial boards of various publications, a tendency that reveals a plurality of voices but a general unwillingness to fight for political power. It could also be concluded that the development of pluralism in Slovenia relies heavily on corporatism because of the general lack of liberal foundations.     

专修学院学生思想动态及其分析

专修学院学生的思想状况比较复杂,认识问题的程度差异较大。本文通过问卷调查,找出学生思想变化的因素,并对其进行分析研究,以不断提高学生思想教育工作的成效。     

依法执政的法意省思

依法执政是中国作为执政党的中国共产党在新形势下执政方式的重大调整和深刻转变,是在依法治国、建设社会主义法治国家的时代背景下执政党执政理念法治化的根本体现,也是顺民心遂民愿的明智之举。依法执政理念要作为指引执政党执政实践的正确航标,本身需要从法治而非人治的视角进行明确的梳理和辩思。     

国家赔偿制度之程序研究

《中华人民共和国国家赔偿法》虽然在施行之初保护了人民的合法权利,但现在的不完善已经影响了其作用的充分发挥,也就不能很好的保护当事人的合法权利,甚至影响当事人合法权利的正确行使。本文对国家赔偿法划分为行政赔偿和司法赔偿两部分,并对它们的现状作简单的梳理,在此基础上提出现实中存在的一些题和解决这些问题的方法。     

Governance without a state: Can it work?

In this article we explore how much state is necessary to make governance work. We begin by clarifying concepts of governance and the “shadow of hierarchy” and we follow this clarification with a brief overview of empirical findings on governance research in developed countries. We then discuss the dilemmas for governance in areas of limited statehood, where political institutions are too weak to hierarchically adopt and enforce collectively binding rules. While prospects for effective policymaking appear to be rather bleak in these areas, we argue that governance research has consistently overlooked the existence of functional equivalents to the shadow of hierarchy. We assert that governance with(out) government can work even in the absence of a strong shadow of hierarchy, we identify functional equivalents to the shadow of hierarchy, and we discuss to what extent they can help overcome issues of legitimacy and effectiveness in areas of limited statehood.     

The Experience of Women Regarding Chilean Government Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic

This study explores the experience of ten possible beneficiaries of the measures provided by the Chilean government during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic through remote semi-structured interviews. The results show a scenario of improvisation. Instead of relying on solid gender equity policies, a patchwork of focused measures was implemented, which increased uncertainty and vulnerability. As a result, women experienced sorrow and despair while facing economic constraints and care tasks mostly on their own. This article shows that care remains invisible in politics while overwhelmingly evident at home. Social care policies are urgently needed.     

治安本质论

从词源和古籍考证的角度开始对治安的本质进行探究,治安实质上是国家对社会的统治、治理和控制;从韩非对治安的论述开始,广义的治安的含义并未改变。治安事实上体现了国家的本质,国家的职能是由对社会的暴力统治和对公共事务的管理两部分组成的。国家依靠物质手段对社会进行控制;警察是国家机器的重要组成部分。“社会治安”的概念在事实和内在逻辑上存在矛盾。     

经济法基本原则的新视野——经济法基础理论的反思之三

经济法的基本原则是经济法学界极富争议的论题之一。这些争议存在的根本原因是学者们对经济法基本原则的内涵有不同理解。经济法的基本原则是反映在宪法和经济法之中,贯穿于经济法的立法、执法、司法、守法和法律监督诸环节的根本性准则。因为不同社会制度条件下人们对经济法存在的基础——市场经济的认识存在深刻的分歧,所以根本就不存在中西通行的具有普遍意义的经济法基本原则,所以需要以新的视野展示经济法的基本原则。中国经济法的社会主义属性是国家与社会关系的现实表现,强调它并非走意识形态的老路,因此,中国经济法的基本原则应当由两部分构成:一是社会主义市场经济原则,二是国家调控原则,它们集中反映了社会主义条件下社会利益的政治表达形式和范围,可称之为“资本的社会主义”,它与资本主义条件下社会成为面具的“社会的资本主义”大异其趣。     

论分裂国家罪的几个问题

本文立足于刑法规定 ,紧密结合司法实践 ,对分裂国家罪的构成特征、罪间界限及其罪数形态等几个基本问题进行了较为深入的研究。     

国际法与主权国家的外交：全球化时代的新发展

全球化趋势使得整个国际社会越来越向组织化、法制化和民主化的方向发展,这对主权国家的外交产生了深远的影响。因此有必要从国际法、国际社会和主权国家之间的互动的关系来考察外交变化和发展。但传统国际法对外交的理解和界定是比较狭隘的,这落后于急速变迁的国际政治现实。国际法既给国家的外交设定了很多限制,也拓宽了国家的外交空间;既增强了主权国家外交解决问题的能力,但同时在一些问题领域又弱化了主权国家的作用。