Adolescent Co-occurring Disorders Treatment: Clinicians' Attitudes,Values, and Knowledge

This study examined community-based clinicians’ (N = 294) attitudes, background/experiences, values, and knowledge relating to issues of co-occurring disorders, which occur at a high rate among adolescents involved in the juvenile justice system. Study results reveal that clinicians self-rate their clinical values and attitudes at or above the expected level of competency, but they concede that their skill and knowledge levels are not adequate. Comparison measures reveal that employment setting conditions, geographic region, hours worked per week, and strongly held convictions about the importance of integrated mental health and substance use disorders service delivery distinguish clinicians’ co-occurring disorders knowledge levels. Implications are offered.     

论法治政府下行政立法听证制度的构想

法治政府是法治国家的必然要求。要建设法治政府,需要规范行政立法听证行为,我国《立法法》虽然对行政立法听证制度有明文规定,但条文过于简单,不具有操作性。因此,我国行政立法听证的范围、听证的物质保障、听证的主持人制度、参与人制度、笔录效力制度、运行程序制度都有进一步探讨的必要。     

合同相对性与合同效力扩张

本文结合我国合同立法对合同相对性与合同效力的扩张问题进行了深入研究,提出了在坚持合同相对性原理的前提下,合同效力适度扩张的有益见解。     

Dealing with uncertainty: the illusion of knowledge in the study of counterterrorism effectiveness

Efforts to combat terrorism have become a priority in the security agenda of most countries around the world, while the respective policies, tools and instruments have amounted to significant costs. In this article, we review the literature on counterterrorism (CT) effectiveness and draw a series of rather negative conclusions with regard to the reliability of our knowledge in this area. We find that the literature displays case and data selection biases, and the results produced are oftentimes contradictory, mostly due to the use of different indicators. We then propose a conceptualisation of CT effectiveness, which should help to resolve some of the issues outlined. The article concludes by outlining some future research directions that should improve our methodological grasp in the field.     

关于强奸罪取证难问题的探讨

强奸案的取证难一直是检察机关探讨的问题，我们审查证据认定事实的时候，既不能让真正的罪犯逃脱惩罚，也不能让无辜的好人遭受冤枉，这一切都有待于证据的有效性。     

票据效力认定研究

票据效力认定问题是适用票据法解决票据纠纷、判断票据上权利义务的起点。基于票据商业货币的属性,流通性和信用性构成了票据的生命力。为了实现和保障流通性,产生了票据的诸多理念和规则。票据作为有价证券的基本属性是票据效力认定的基础;要式证券性是决定票据效力的因素;在对票据效力进行解释时,必须遵循有效性解释原则。     

非公企业党组织发挥实质作用的策略选择——以温州的实践为例

实质作用发挥是非公有制企业党建生命力的所在。目前,非公企业党组织的合法性不足,功能定位不清,工作方式不适应,党组织和党员的作用发挥受限等因素制约着党组织实质作用的发挥,党组织的力量面临被边缘化的危险。非公企业党组织必须在战略定位和策略选择上实现全面创新,把握非公企业党建的规律,增强对环境的应变能力和适应能力,以有效作为获取政治认同,确保在非公企业的权威和影响力。     

效益最优视角下的我国视频侦查工作进路——基于周克华案、波士顿马拉松爆炸案、伦敦地铁爆炸案的比较研究

我国视频侦查工作的实施状况包括投入与效果两个层面。周克华案、波士顿马拉松爆炸案、伦敦地铁爆炸案中的案件基本参数状况、资源投入状况与收益状况是评价视频侦查工作实施状况的具体指标。视频侦查工作效益最优是指在视频侦查资源成本投入一定的情况下实现侦查效益的最大化。视频侦查工作效益最优的经济学模型包括理想与现实状态两种函数。视频侦查工作的效益最优还应当兼顾法学与社会学领域的内容。效益最优视角下的我国视频侦查工作进路是一种体系化的工作形式,由原理、硬件、人员与机制四个层面的内容组成。     

权威、权益、权衡：当代中国公民的政策参与

从长远来看,社会和经济的发展会带来公民政策参与的扩大。而从理论与现实考量,不适度的政策参与带来失序和无效,只有适度的公民参与才有利于政策过程的顺利实施。而这种适度的把握来自于公民政策参与,政府权威与公民权益的权衡,权衡的真正本意在于追求公民政策参与的有序性和有效性。     

论我国船舶物权变动模式的立法选择

<物权法>对船舶物权变动采用了意思主义模式,在意思主义物权变动模式下,船舶物权变动不以登记为必要条件,登记是当事人的自愿行为而且登记只具有公示力而没有公信力.船舶物权乃物权,物权为对世权,本可对抗一切人,但依意思主义,船舶物权变动因双方当事人的合意而完成而且变动后的船舶物权在完备公示前不能对抗第三人,而不能对抗第三人之"物权"是否为真正意义上的物权,颇值疑问.一国立法在物权变动模式问题上应在考虑促进交易快捷,保障交易安全等因素的基础上做出正确的选择.