城乡规划中“公共福祉”的判定研究——一则著名美国案例的分析及其对中国的启示

对于美国城市规划判例中的著名案件"劳雷尔山Ⅰ案"判决的解读,可以分析得出:城市规划中"公共福祉"的判断不应仅限于规划所辖地域范围内的利益考虑,还应考虑受规划影响的地域和人群;人的基本住房需求是"公共福祉"的绝对要素,当公共福祉的各要素间冲突时,要素的重要性以及手段和目标之间的不可替代性成为在具体情况下公共福祉判断的关键;"公共福祉"实现需要私人和公共行为共同作用。以上结论对于我国城乡规划制定中应考虑的利益范围的确定及其考量因素冲突的选择,提供了启示。     

《弟子规》对现代心理健康指导意义解读

《弟子规》不仅是一部幼童启蒙读物,同时也是一部具有心理健康指导意义的书籍。《弟子规》从正确处理人际关系、人与环境关系、自我定位等三方面提出了中肯建议,引导人们建立和谐的身心世界,不断完善自己的人格品行,最终达到臻善完美的圣贤境界。     

儿童贫困界定和测度研究综述

科学地界定儿童贫困和建立儿童贫困测度体系是全面把握我国儿童贫困状况,制定更加科学合理的儿童减贫政策的关键。本文对国际组织和国内外研究机构如何依据贫困理论对儿童贫困进行界定,以及采取的测量方法进行了综述,同时对现有的文献进行了评述并展望了儿童贫困测量研究未来值得重视的方向和领域。     

行政法上的物权初探

有相当的国有财产是为公务便利或社会公益服务而存在的 ,国家作为行政主体行使行政权时在该财产上享有的物权不同于民法上的物权 ,不以盈利为目的 ,不应受一般私法规则的支配 ,而应受公法规则的支配。存在于该财产之上的物权便是行政法上的物权。法国行政法将公众用物和行政活动用物作为不同于私有财产的“公产” ,这一划分在现代国家体系及市场经济背景下有重要意义。借鉴相关理论 ,建立、健全我国行政法上的物权理论 ,将对我国行政法理论和实践大有裨益     

“I WANT MY MOMMIES”: THE CRY FOR MINI‐DOMAS TO RECOGNIZE THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILDREN OF SAME‐SEX COUPLES*

In child custody cases, courts will look to the best interests of a child to maintain visitation/custody rights only with the child's biological parent, not third parties. However, with a same‐sex couple, it is inevitable that one parent will not be the biological parent. Thus, when that parent is in a mini‐DOMA state, where same‐sex couples from non‐mini‐DOMA states do not have to be recognized, that parent will be viewed as a third party and lose all visitation/custody rights if the couple separates. This note advocates that mini‐DOMAs allow both the biological and nonbiological parents of a same‐sex couple to have visitation/custody rights of their children if it would be in the best interest of the children to do so.     

Predictors of Child Behavior Problems among Children of Female Vietnam Veterans

This study examined the impacts of intimate partner aggression by female Vietnam veterans and their male partners on their children’s behavior problems (N = 100 children). Veteran and partner psychological distress were also examined as potential mediators of these relationships. Results indicated that physical and psychological aggression perpetration by both the female veteran and the male partner was associated with child behavior problems. Contrary to expectations, psychological distress in the veteran and partner was not associated with child behavior problems and did not mediate the effects of physical and psychological aggression on this outcome.     

孙中山“国利民福’’思想探析——革命党人情怀、目标和宗旨论

"国利民福"是民元至民二上半年这一特定历史时段的词汇,笼统地指近代民族国家的经济利益和人民的福利、幸福。它是孙中山对在清帝逊位后准备实行的民生主义的一种理论预期,也是他在分析实行民生主义的效果时提出来的一个概念。它既是革命党人的出发点和应有的情怀,又是革命党人追求的最终目标,甚至被上升为革命政党的主义或党德的高度,孙中山因此将他所从事的民主革命称为"国利民福革命"。由于"国利民福"中的"国"特指近代民族国家,即孙中山心目中真正的中华民国,当中华民国名存实亡时,"国利民福"就很少出现在孙中山的各类文本中。     

企业工会：能动的行动者——以北京中外合资企业B有限公司工会实践为例

B有限公司的工会具有代表性,是市场条件下新型劳资关系发展的雏型。工会的组织结构是党政工的高度重合,正是凭借党组织在企业中的影响力工会能够较为有利地实现其权利。工会目标从传统国有企业的生产与维权的双重目标,向着以维权为主的目标发展,建立了一套准市场化的工会目标,即以福利目标为主、民主目标为辅的功能体系。这样,以政府、资方和工会三方谈判为主的劳资关系就被制度化了,工会成为“能动的行动者”,即作为工人利益的代言人,它能主动的发挥作用。     

职工集体福利的理论分析与制度建构

构建全体成员各尽其能、各得其所而又和谐相处的社会已经成为未来的奋斗目标,而衡量标准之一就是社会总体福利和成员个体福利的同步增长。历史经验和理论研究已经证明,增进福利的重要使命不能由国家独自承担,多元化的福利供给是构建和谐社会的重要内容。企业是社会主义市场经济的活动主体,也应当和能够参与福利供给,内容之一就是职工集体福利。我国旧的职工福利制度是计划经济和国家福利的产物,必须在理论反思基础上,就职工集体福利的资金筹集、管理机构和供给方式等方面予以制度重构。     

The Welfare Agenda of the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe: Combining Welfare Chauvinism,Producerism and Populism*

Recent scholarship on the populist radical right tends to imprecisely describe the welfare agenda of this party family with reference to its key ideological characteristics of nativism, authoritarianism, and populism. We propose an alternative analytical framework that considers the multidimensionality of welfare state positions and the “deservingness criteria” that underlie ideas about welfare entitlement. Applying this framework to a sample of four European populist radical right parties, we conclude that three interrelated frames inform their welfare agenda. These parties, we argue, advocate social closure not only on the basis of the deservingness criterion of identity (welfare chauvinism), but also on criteria of control, attitude, and reciprocity (welfare producerism) and on an antagonism between the people and the establishment (welfare populism). Understanding the welfare agenda of the populist radical right requires us to move beyond welfare chauvinism and to reconsider the concept of welfare producerism and its interaction with welfare chauvinism.