调取证据应该成为一项独立的侦查取证措施吗?-调取证据措施正当性批判

我国侦查实践中的调取证据是一项独立的、具备干预性的强制处分措施。调取证据措施之所以具有上述性质，与侦查机关对《刑事诉讼法》的误读密切相关。这种误读违背体系解释，有违法明确性原则，不利证据排除。应将现有的调取证据措施整合进扣押措施，使之成为提出命令式的扣押，在此基础上，应进一步平衡查明事实和人权保障之间的关系，对扣押措施的运用做出相应的限制。     

珠海港与中山保税区“双核心”架构推进珠中同城化构想

该文阐述了珠中江都市圈一体化发展的最新进展,并提出了通过珠海港与中山保税区＂双核心＂架构推进珠中同城化,进而以珠中同城化推动珠中江同城化发展的构想。为此,可把珠海港打造成为中山的＂虚拟海港＂,把中山保税区打造成为珠海港的＂虚拟保税区＂,然后以这两个虚拟港区作为核心,在形态上、资源上、功能政策上实现保税区与珠海港政策共享和联动开发,突破区域行政壁垒。     

边防部门办理刑事案件中特殊侦查行为适用的探析

当前，犯罪分子的犯罪手段日益多样化、隐蔽化、科技化，为了有效制止犯罪，维护社会秩序的稳定，各国在一些特定犯罪案件的侦查中都或多或少采取了一定的特殊侦查行为。边防部门由于侦破案件的特殊性，在实践中对特殊侦查行为也有适用，但由于我国现行法律的缺失，给特殊侦查行为的适用造成了一定的障碍。为此，在实践工作中必须把握住特定案件原则、必要性原则、特定对象原则和审查批准原则，以正确、合法的原则指导行为，从而最大限度地发挥特殊侦查行为对侦控犯罪的作用和效果。     

中国知识产权法院的愿景及其实现路径

中国知识产权专业审判组织的建构始自20世纪90年代,知识产权法院是其自然延伸。设立知识产权法院有诸多理由,如促进司法统一、提高程序效率、强化知识产权保护、树立良好国际形象、试点司法改革等,但并不能从理性上由此得出知识产权法院具有必然性的结论。因而,知识产权法院是综合政策的结果。知识产权法院在我国应定位于专门法院,其建立与完善是一个长期的过程。有必要借鉴域外知识产权法院的经验,并结合现实国情,建立有中国特色的知识产权法院制度。知识产权法院的建设还应置于司法改革的背景下,在司法体制、机制以及知识产权特别程序制度方面进行探索,为全面的司法改革积累经验。     

Judicial Justice for Special Economic Zone Land Resistance

Abstract

The context for land resistance in liberalising India is dynamic. As the state promotes capital investment, lines between public and private are blurred. Land is central to these efforts, as new industries, mines, large-scale agricultural projects and infrastructure initiatives all require vast amounts of land. The introduction of Special Economic Zones (SEZ) in the Indian state of Goa highlight land deal tensions. Following protests rallying thousands and widespread public mistrust of land and regional planning processes, the state’s chief minister halted the zones. This action mollified public unrest and temporarily appeased anti-SEZ social movements. However, scepticism arose as the chief minister failed to legally de-register the zones and return SEZ lands to original owners or collectives. Amidst state inaction, movement members sought judicial justice. Protest and corruption theories are integrated with political interpretations of liminality in this article to frame how social movements shift their patterns of intervention in response to or in anticipation of inaction. Enhanced opportunities for corruption, exemplified by the SEZ model, lead movements to adapt strategies of resistance beyond state-oriented protest. The interventions discussed represent a shift in the ritual form of protest and the degree of political engagement with the judiciary. The multi-faceted contestation altered power structure, while politicising and scrutinising land deals.     

Parenting Plans for Special Needs Children: Applying a Risk‐Assessment Model

Family courts are seeing an increasing number of separating or divorced families who have a special needs child. These cases present complex challenges for family law professionals charged with crafting parenting plans based on best interests standards. For many of these children, the typical developmentally based custodial arrangements may not be suitable, given the child's specific symptoms and treatment needs. We present a model for understanding how the general and specific needs of these children, as well as the demands on parents, can be assessed and understood in the context of divorce. This includes an analysis of risk and protective factors that inform timeshare and custodial recommendations and determinations. The risk assessment model is then applied to three of the most commonly occurring childhood neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders likely to be encountered in family court, namely, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depressive disorders, and autistic spectrum disorders.

Key Points for the Family Court Community
• There has been a dramatic rise in the population of children with neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and medical syndromes whose parents are disputing custody in the family courts.
• Family law professionals of all disciplines should develop a fundamental knowledge base about the most commonly seen special needs children in family court, such as those with neurodevelopmental conditions like autistic spectrum disorder, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and severe depressive disorders (especially with teenagers), which may involve suicidal or self‐harming behaviors.
• Commonly recommended parenting plans may be inappropriate for many special needs children, as some function significantly below their chronological age and pose extreme behavioral challenges.
• A systematic analysis of risk and protective factors should inform timeshare arrangements and determinations with this varied population, including the safety of the child and severity of the disorder, parental commitment and availability to pursue medical, educational, and therapeutic services, the parental attunement and insightful about the problem, and the differential parenting skills of each parent.

     

论"一国两制"下香港特别行政区行政长官的特殊法律地位

香港基本法明确规定 :香港特别行政区行政长官既是香港特别行政区的首长 ,也是香港特别行政区政府的首长。这说明行政长官在法律地位上具有双重身份。运用比较研究的方法 ,深入研究行政长官这一特殊法律地位的特性表现 ,并从行政长官所拥有的职权 ,进一步考察行政长官的职权与其特殊法律地位的关系 ,将有助于全面了解香港特别行政区行政长官的角色特征     

公安文件(档案)运动规律

公安文件(档案)的运动分为形成制作、现实使用、现行档案(暂时保存)、历史(非现行)档案四阶段。但其运动中也有中止、回流、跳跃、位移、增生等特殊现象。我们应当重视这些特殊现象,选择适宜的归档时间和保管方式,有效地开展档案管理。     

虚开增值税专用发票罪认定中的几个疑难问题

虚开增值税专用发票罪,在司法实践中存在比较大的争议:一是多人分别实施虚开与骗税行为如何适用刑法第二百零五条第二款;二是虚开数额的认定;三是虚开增值税专用发票罪与其他相关犯罪的竞合问题;四是单位和自然人构成虚开增值税专用发票罪的认定。     

制度创新、区域分工协作与长江经济带良性发展——基于国外流域经济带发展经验的思考

该文在定量分析长江经济带经济发展、产业分工协作等现状的基础上,较为深入地分析了当前长江经济带发展中所存在的主要问题,文章还结合美国密西西比河和欧洲莱茵河流域经济带发展的经验,就中国长江经济带良性发展提出了相关政策建议。