西部民营企业人力资源管理存在问题及对策

西部民营企业要在西部大开发中发挥其主体作用,就必须高度重视人力资源管理。西部民营企业人力资源管理的 主要问题是人力资源管理的战略作用没有得到应有重视和人力资源管理理念没有得到充分体现。要加强人力资源管理就必须建 立现代企业制度,建立员工与企业利益的共同体,建立科学的人才管理制度和严格的考核体系等。     

公安文书在公安执法中的重要作用

公安执法中存在的许多问题都与公安文书的制作有关。从贵州省公安厅2001、2002年度全省执法考评调研情况可看出,公安机关在执法中存在与公安文书有关的三个方面的问题——法律手续有关的问题、语言问题、文体不规范问题。所以,应采取积极的措施提高民警的公安文书的制作能力,减少执法工作中的错误,提高办案效率和质量。     

论国际环境法的发展与国家环境主权理念的确立

环境问题的超越国界性使国际环境法得以产生 ,国际环境法的形成以及环境问题在国际关系中所处的至关重要的地位 ,不仅对国际法律秩序提出了挑战 ,也促使了国家环境主权理念的确立     

社会主义本质理论与实际结合的三个难题论析

掌握邓小平关于社会主义本质的理论,必须解决理论与实际结合的三个难题:“社会主义本质论”的价值问题“社会主义本质”的存在问题“社会主义本质”的实现问题。解决这三个问题,有利于全党和全民把学习邓小平关于社会主义的本质理论与实际紧密地结合起来,与时俱进,更加自觉地坚持和运用社会主义本质理论。     

An 18-Year Model of Family and Peer Effects on Adolescent Drug Use and Delinquency

The interrelationship of family and peer experiences in predicting adolescent problem behaviors was examined in an 18-year longitudinal sample of adolescents (N = 198) from conventional and nonconventional families. Positive associations among early childhood predictors and adolescent problem behaviors were consistent with problem behavior theory. The most powerful predictors of teen drug use and delinquent behaviors were similar behaviors by peers. Peer behaviors, however, were in turn predicted by earlier family-related variables and the quality of peer relationships in childhood. This study provides supporting evidence that strong peer effects in adolescence reflect even earlier processes in childhood and highlight the importance of linkages from early childhood experiences in family and peer contexts to the development of problem behaviors in adolescence. Implications for prevention and intervention programs are discussed.     

关于企业核心竞争力的若干理论问题探讨

增强企业核心竞争力是当前企业发展具有战略意义的选择。为此 ,要全面了解企业核心竞争力理论的发展过程 ,准确把握核心竞争力的内涵 ,正确指导企业核心竞争力战略的实践     

宪法关怀:解开农民问题千千结

中国是一个典型的农民大国 ,农民问题始终是中国革命、建设和改革的根本问题。农民负担沉重、农民权利受到侵害是我们面临的沉重困惑。长期以来的种种理论探讨和制度设计大都未走出排除农民在外的人治的思维定势。赋予宪法对农民的深情关怀 ,凸显农民的公民权利 ,让农民参与制定“游戏规则” ,给农民以平等的国民待遇 ,是真正彻底解决农民问题的终极选择。     

Design Thinking in Policymaking Processes: Opportunities and Challenges

Design thinking has the potential to improve problem definition and mechanism design in policymaking processes. By promoting greater understanding of how citizens experience government services, design thinking can support public managers who desire to enhance public value. In Australia, as elsewhere, design thinking currently remains separated from mainstream policymaking efforts. This article clarifies the essence of design thinking and its applicability to policy development. Five design thinking strategies are discussed, all of which have lengthy histories as social science methodologies. They are (1) environmental scanning, (2) participant observation, (3) open‐to‐learning conversations, (4) mapping, and (5) sensemaking. Recent examples from Australia and New Zealand are used to illustrate how these strategies have been incorporated into policymaking efforts. The article concludes by considering how design thinking might be more broadly applied in policymaking, and the training and resourcing requirements that would entail.     

Future generations as rightholders

Many people believe that we have obligations with respect to future generations concerning the state of the environment that we pass on to them. Apart from the practical problem of people not really acting on such beliefs, there are also conceptual or philosophical issues that make these obligations problematic. The so-called non-identity problem is especially difficult: depending on which courses of action we adopt, different people will be born in the future, which means that even future people who due to our behavior will live under fairly poor circumstances might not have any ground for complaint. Had we not behaved as we did, they would not even have existed. It is argued here that, at least within a rights-theoretical approach, the non-identity problem can be solved by moving from considering individual rights to generational rights, rights which future generations hold qua generations.     

Narrative,Rhetorical Argument,and Ethical Authority

The great challenge of rhetorical argument is to make discourse ethical without making it less logical. This challenge is of central importance throughout the full range of practical argument, and understanding the relation of the ethical to the logical is one of the principal contributions the humanities, in this case the study of rhetoric, can make to legal scholarship. Aristotle’s Rhetoric shows how arguments can be ethical and can create ethical relations between speaker and hearer. I intend to apply Aristotle’s analysis to a phenomenon that did not yet exist for him, that of authority, by asking how the acts of asserting and accepting authority can be ethical acts. I take as a test case a peculiarly unfortunate and inept appeal to authority, that offered by the counsel for the District of Columbia in arguing Bolling v Sharp who cited Taney’s opinion in Dred Scott to clinch his point. By seeing just what goes wrong in such a maladroit appeal, I explore the rational, voluntary and ethical dimensions of a decision to accept a given commitment to authority. I use Joseph Raz’s analysis of authority and the relation of reason to authority, yet think I go beyond Raz by exploring the deliberate and voluntary nature of submission to authority. Choosing to be bound by an authority is an ethical act. As such it is always rational and yet never purely rational. The Supreme Court’s choice of authorities is part of its making itself into an authority, and is a paradigm of the ethical act of choosing to be obligated. Choosing to be committed or obligated is a central paradox of political theory and considerations of authority and obligation, at least since early social contract theorists. However, its importance for judicial reasoning, which at the same time chooses to submit to authority and itself becomes an authority, has not been noted. Consideration of the relations between the ethical and the logical can help us better to articulate the constitution of ethical authority. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.