刍议暴力型未成年矫正对象的心理矫治

自从2003年我国开展社区矫正试点以来,这种新的行刑方式对于维护社会稳定与和谐发展发挥了非常重要的作用.作为一种特殊的被矫正群体,暴力型未成年矫正对象受家庭、学校、社会和自身因素的影响,针对由此产生的不同于未成年人的心理行为特点,提出相应的心理矫治对策,以提高社区矫正工作质量.     

社区矫正检察监督实效性分析

社区矫正检察监督实效是检察机关监督能力在社区矫正中的体现,也是检察监督制度绩效的微观反映。社区矫正监督实效可以从点、线、面三个维度进行观测。监督理念的落后、法律规范的缺失、监督机制的障碍等是现阶段社区矫正检察监督实效的制约因素。应从转变监督理念、提升监督能力、界定监督范围、创新监督机制等路径入手,提升社区矫正检察监督的...     

社区矫正问题探究

社区矫正作为与监禁矫正相对的行刑方式,凭借其能促进罪犯更好回归社会的矫正效果,已成为当今刑罚改革发展的趋势。其中,检察院的监督职能不可或缺。只有在检察机关更好地发挥其监督职能的前提下,才能使社区矫正整个体系得到良好地运行。     

社区矫正行刑方式观探微

在我国,将社区矫正视为与监禁矫正相对的行刑方式,是一种比较普遍的观点,但是从长远看,这种观点是非常有害的。因而有必要对其进行反思。社区矫正性质应定位为:在社区中实行的,采用社会工作方法对矫正对象进行的矫正活动。     

The Psychiatric Aspects of Solitary Confinement

Mental health workers who work in correctional facilities frequently have to assess and treat clients in solitary confinement (SC). SC is used as a procedure in correctional facilities for a variety of reasons including punishment, protection of the person, security of the institution, or for more intensive observation. In this article we have taken a fresh and critical view of the literature to attempt to delineate the effects of SC on mental health. The research in this area reveals mixed findings. Some studies extrapolate findings from social isolation experiments and the findings from prisoner of war (POW) camps. Many other studies have severe limitations. Most of the better studies suggest that SC is not harmful to the majority of people but conclude that some may be less resilient due to their personality construct or perhaps due to mental illness. Further research is needed to clarify this issue.     

社区矫正的程序保障制度比较研究

社区矫正代表着罪犯处遇的未来走向,但我国当前社区矫正的总体发展水平比较低,加紧社区矫正制度的构建和完善已成当务之急。应当构建完备的立法、科学的裁量机制和健全的执行体系,以保障和促进社区矫正在我国的发展。     

上诉审纠错功能的法律思考——以法院层级关系为分析视角

法院层级关系的类型直接决定了上诉审的功能定位,亦直接影响到了案件的上诉率及法院判决的权威。在科层制法院层级关系中,上诉审的纠错功能定位虽然具有一定的依据,但其亦存在无法克服的内在理论缺陷,会对司法实践造成巨大的负面影响。在协作制的法院层级关系中,由于各级法院只是权力分工不同,不存在高低之分,所以上诉审不具备纠错审的定位条件。上诉审功能的理想定位应当是通过吸纳当事人的不满而将相关争议控制在司法体系之内解决,从而在根本上维护司法系统的权威,法院对案件的再次审理不过是对原审判决进行验算而已。     

Beyond Confinement: The Regulation of Girl Offenders’ Bodies,Sexual Choices,and Behavior

Throughout transformations in juvenile justice, control over girls’ bodies, sexual behavior, and reproductive choices has remained a constant focal point among decision makers, with girls infrequently charged with serious law violations and commonly judged in terms of their moral welfare and chasteness. Using interview data with 62 court and correctional decision makers, this article examines how the contemporary juvenile justice system responds to girls’ sexual behavior and explores the policies and procedures used to restrain sexual agency and reproductive choices, both physically and cognitively. This article also investigates the penalties enforced when girls resist such controls as well as intentions toward change and reform in the system.     

WHEN POLICY COMES TO TOWN: DISCOURSES AND DILEMMAS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF A STATEWIDE REENTRY POLICY IN KANSAS

In this case study, we document challenges to reform implementation posed by line staff, supervisors, and managers during a large‐scale realignment of the Kansas Department of Corrections (KDOC) in which they sought to replace a traditional approach of “risk containment” focused on surveillance and incarceration with a new model of “risk reduction” focused on service delivery and reintegration. We draw on interviews, observations, and archival research to document the staff's discursive challenges to the rollout of the new policy. More specifically, we describe how varying challenges to the reforms—“denial,” “dismissal,” and “defiance”—reflect actors’ positions within the organization, the local contexts in which they operate, and more general frames of interpretation of the long‐term orientation of the KDOC. We integrate these perspectives to contribute to the ongoing expansion of conventional models of penal change that highlight the role of actors and local social and institutional context as moderators of the gap between “law on the books” and “law in action.”     

社区矫正主体重塑

社区矫正在我国各地开花结果,其法律规范、制度设计、社会保障、社区参与等方面的问题都逐渐凸显出来,并成为阻碍社区矫正进一步深入发展的棘手问题,社区矫正主体方面的混乱状态只是其中一例,有必要重塑社区矫正主体体系,厘清社区矫正工作秩序,推动社区矫正工作执行。