华商网络内部信息交流机制研究

华商网络的成功，来自于其内部的信息交流与合作机制，它对于克服现实中大量存在的非正式贸易与投资壁垒起着非常重要的作用；“五缘关系”是华商网络内部信息交流机制的核心，在此基础上形成了多种交流方式与渠道，而且多种交流方式之间可以相互重合；华商网络内部区分成员的标准越松散，那么成员的信息交流与合作就变得越为困难，但如果区分成员的标准过于严格的话，又会造成华商网络规模过小，从而不利于华商之间的合作。     

试析东盟主要成员国的海洋战略

东盟成员国除老挝外都与海洋相邻,本文拟分析东盟主要成员国的海洋战略,包括目标、目的和谋略三个方面。     

ASEAN ISIS与亚太安全制度建构:以ARF机制为核心的分析

本文以ASEAN ISIS在创设亚太安全合作机制--ARF中所发挥的作用为例,分析亚太认知共同体在安全机制建构中的作用,即提出和形成一种新的安全观,并推动亚太安全观的社会化与机制化.这一研究表明,在适当的情况下,认知共同体也可以在国际安全合作领域发挥重要作用.     

Canada's goal in the Asia Pacific

Canada's chief goal in the Pacific is to gain a greater share in the economic growth of East Asia while promoting regional stability through middle power multilateralism. Like other Western countries in the Pacific Canada should strongly support trans‐oceanic groups like the ASEAN PMCs and the APEC group as well as the numerous non‐governmental organizations devoted to keeping the countries on both sides of the Pacific cooperating together, both developed and developing. Both the US under Clinton and Canada under Chretien seem to believe the economic future of their countries depends to a significant extent on participating in East Asian economic development. Giving good economic relations precedence over sanctions suggests that they have committed themselves to that course. If successful, Canada's regional activism may help to counter its weakening European ties and its greater absorption into North America, and it may help to increase its foreign influence and independence.     

From the ASEAN People's Assembly to the ASEAN Civil Society Conference: the boundaries of civil society advocacy

Civil society organisations (CSOs) have asserted their claim for participation in regional governance in Southeast Asia through multiple forums held since the late-1990s. The two most enduring are the ASEAN People's Assembly (APA), organised by ASEAN-ISIS and held seven times from 2000 to 2009, and the ASEAN Civil Society Conference (ACSC), organised by the Solidarity for Asian People's Advocacy network and held nine times from 2005 to the present. Through comparative analysis of the boundaries of CSO participation in these two events, this article explains why the APA was superseded by the ACSC, and it highlights states' growing intrusions into the ACSC. It argues that states' expanding repertoire of tactics to direct the ACSC has seen the structure of CSO participation in this event recast, challenging the view of the ACSC as an independent space for advocacy and indicating the hollowness of ASEAN's commitments to creating a ‘people-oriented’ Association.     

中国沿海沿边内陆地区构建对东盟开放型经济分析——以广东、广西、云南、四川为例

中国—东盟自由贸易区建立后,中国沿海、沿边、内陆地区充分发挥各自优势,抓住战略机遇,竞相掀起了构建对东盟开放型经济的新高潮。共性是：实行积极主动的对东盟开放战略;重点深化与东盟的经贸合作;搭建开放合作平台,完善开放合作机制;加快实施＂走出去＂战略。区别是：东部沿海地区实施＂双转移＂战略;西部内陆地区重点是加快综合交通枢纽建设,深化与周边省市合作;西部沿边地区重点是参与国际多区域合作,加大边境经济合作区和国际大通道建设。本文研究提出新形势下推进泛珠三角区域创新开放模式构建对东盟开放型经济的新思路。     

中国-东盟高等教育合作中的孔子学院——发展现状及其面临的问题

创建孔子学院是中国与东盟国家在高等教育合作领域的特殊形式。近年来,孔子学院的建设在东盟国家发展迅速,这主要得益于中国经济的高速发展、东盟国家和中国的地缘相近、东南亚华人华侨众多、东南亚国家人民对中国文化的热爱,以及中国-东盟自由贸易区建设带来的发展机遇等。孔子学院在东盟国家的发展也面临一些困难,师资和教材问题是其进一步发展的主要障碍,东盟国家的“文化威胁论”以及孔子学院激起周边国家的软实力竞争的反应也是一个不容忽视的问题。     

发挥广西民间资源优势 促进中国与东盟国家友好合作

广西与东盟国家山水相连,与东盟国家民间交往具有许多优势,广西人民在中国与东盟国家民间交流中的作用无可替代。本文在分析广西民间外交资源优势的基础上,提出了广西与东盟国家开展民间友好交流的7点建议。     

国际金融危机下东盟四国的银行业研究

2007年爆发的美国次贷危机早已转变为席卷全球的国际金融危机。由于东盟四国的银行业正处在改革与调整时期,其银行业发展轨迹明显不同于其他国家和地区。东盟四国银行业系统的基本面良好,甚至在危机期间还逆势而行,主要得益于东盟四国在1997年东亚金融危机爆发之后所采取的一系列有效的改革措施及此次金融危机东盟四国政府所采取的积极应对举措。     

Ideas,identity, and institution‐building: From the ‘ASEAN way’ to the ‘Asia‐Pacific way'?

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which the development of multilateral institutions in the Asia‐Pacific region may be viewed as an exercise in identity‐building. It argues that institution‐building in this region is more of a ‘process‐orientated’ phenomenon, rather than simply being an outcome of structural changes in the international system (such as the decline of American hegemony). The process combines universal principles of multilateralism with some of the relatively distinct modes of socialization prevailing in the region. Crucial to the process have been the adaptation of four ideas: ‘cooperative security’, ‘open regionalism’, ‘soft regionalism’, and ‘flexible consensus’. The construction of a regional identity, which may be termed the ‘Asia‐Pacific Way’ has also been facilitated by the avoidance of institutional grand designs and the adoption of a consensual and cautious approach extrapolated from the ‘ASEAN Way’. The final section of the article examines the limitations and dangers of the Asia‐Pacific Way. It concludes with the assertion that while the Asia‐Pacific Way is an over‐generalised, instrumental, and pragmatic approach to regional cooperation, and there remain significant barriers to the development of a collective regional identity that is constitutive of the interests of the actors, it has helped introduce the concept and practice of multilateralism into a previously sceptical region and might have ‘bought’ enough time and space for regional actors to adapt to the demands of multilateralism.