辽宁省治安调解情况调查

辽宁省近三年治安调解实践的调查情况表明,因民间纠纷引发的社会矛盾纠纷呈现出与社会变迁相关的新特点,与之相对应,治安调解已经成为治安案件查处和平息纠纷、化解矛盾的主要方式。但是,无论立法还是执法实践,治安调解在公安基础工作方面的重要性与其得到的重视程度显然极不相称,且显现立法和实践断裂的现象。在此基础上,针对相关问题,本文在立法和执法两个环节提出了相应的解决措施。     

清末“礼法之争”对现代中国法律制度的影响

清末“礼法之争”是中国与世界法制接轨的发端。礼教派提出的变法应立足本国国情,因俗治宜,保持各自的特色,有其合理性和一定的科学性,是符合我国现阶段的立法精神的。而法理派的主张由缺少中国特色。以史为鉴,我们要在拿来和守望中学会有所选择,有所摒弃,这也是今天法治建设的题中之义。     

论司法鉴定人员职业道德规范的完善

为了进一步规范司法鉴定活动,促进司法公正,建议提高司法鉴定人员思想认识水准、建立健全司法鉴定职业道德规范、加强职业道德培训、建立健全考评机制、净化执业环境、建立健全相关机制,使司法鉴定活动朝法制化、科学化、有序化方向发展。     

儒家伦理与法治精神

信用缺失、纲纪崩坏、吏治腐败是当前最为突出的社会问题,对于产生这种法治困境的深层原因,人们普遍将其归结为制度不健全。而儒家文化对市场经济的不适应症状,是儒家伦理对法治精神的消解和化约。儒家文化中的等级伦理、宗法伦理、和合伦理与法治精神格格不入,严重阻滞着法治所追求的公平、正义、自由、权利的实现。     

行政诉讼调解制度的理论构建

由于经济环境和政府职能的变化,行政诉讼法中不适用调解制度的规定已不符合现实需要,结合当前国情,构建“调审合一”的行政诉讼调解制度,对保护行政相对人合法权益及规范变相调解十分必要。     

诉讼调解中恶意串通行为的法律规制

诉讼调解虽然具有程序简便,高效解决民事纠纷的程序价值,但因缺乏充分监督和制约的程序,易于被不诚信当事人用以牟取非法利益。诉讼调解中原、被告恶意串通损害案外人权利行为,实质上属诉讼欺诈侵权行为,既损害了案外人权益,也损害了司法权威。强化司法审判职权,完善诉讼调解程序监督机制,从程序法、实体法上对恶意调解串通行为进行法律规制。     

化解我国社会矛盾的战略举措

构建化解社会矛盾的大调解机制是我国新世纪新阶段应对矛盾凸显的战略举措。大调解机制在实践中主要形成了两种模式,发挥了巨大作用,要根据时代需要不断努力完善这一机制。     

To Pay Suspicious Attention: Following the Weave of ‘Mixed Logics’ in Women’s Ethical Decision Making

This article explores areas of law loosely within English equity and trusts law that have not conventionally been subject to feminist debate, and within the context of a discussion about feminist method. The particular areas examined are whistleblowing and trustees’ powers of investment, each of which calls for consideration of decision-making processes which have an ethical content. These sites are chosen because they take debate outside the all too familiar locations of woman or ‘the body of woman’, including the family home, where feminist analysis in relation to equity and trusts tends to stray. In exploring these chosen fields, Hobby’s (Feminist Perspectives on Equity and Trusts, Cavendish Publishing, 2001, pp. 219–255) critique of gender dimensions in relation to whistleblowing and Dunn’s (Feminist Perspectives on Equity and Trusts, Cavendish Publishing, 2001, pp. 179–196) account of women trustees’ investment decisions are evaluated and developed. The debate within feminist legal criticism of the possibility of integrating an ‘ethics of care’ and an ‘ethics of rights’ is acknowledged. Whilst acknowledging of the difficulty of adopting an approach that recognises ‘mixed logics’, it is concluded that women (and men) do integrate the ethics of care and the ethics of rights in their decision-making. It is argued that the effort should be made to trace the specific weave in particular circumstances, thereby paying suspicious attention to the values that underlie courts’ analyses of ethical choices.     

Mystical Anarchism

Abstract

This essay explores the philosophical significance of the history of mystical anarchism for contemporary ethics and politics. It examines the complex relationship between religion and politics, and elaborates the thesis that many of our contemporary political concepts are secularized theological concepts. After a critical discussion of Carl Schmitt's theory of sovereignty and John Gray's critique of liberal humanism, it examines the anarchist practices of medieval mystics such as Marguerite Porete and the heresy of the Movement of the Free Spirit, and contrasts this mystical anarchist tradition with more recent forms of anarchism, such as Raoul Vaneigem's Situationism.

Retrieving the mystical anarchist tradition might help us rethink the relationship between religion and politics and suggest ethically grounded forms of anarchism that avoid violence or abstraction.