关于实施经济技术创新工程的思考

经济技术创新工程适应了知识经济时代和经济全球化、竞争国际化的客观需要 ,也是新形势下工会工作的新的内容。它对于提高职工队伍的素质 ,依靠职工的创造力推动企业快速发展有着重要的现实意义。为此 ,工会要做好这项工作     

English Transgender Law Reform and the Spectre of Corbett

This article will provide a critique of tworecent English marriage law decisions, thefirst concerning a (female to male) transgenderman and the second a (male to female)intersexed woman. It will do so throughconsideration of the dialogue between each andthe landmark transgender case of Corbett v. Corbett. It will highlight howboth decisions, in seeking to minimise the factof `departure' from Corbett, serve toreproduce key elements of that decision whichserve to undermine the future prospects fortransgender law reform in the English context.In particular, both decisions, in differentways, or with different emphases, ensure that`legal sex' continues to be determined by(bio)logical and temporal factors. Crucially,however, as in Corbett, it is legalanxiety over the boundaries of the `natural',and the homophobia of law, that underscoresthis anxiety, that account for these particularconstructions of `legal sex'.     

创建学习型企业--知识经济时代企业制胜的法宝

"学习型企业"是未来成功的模式.构建学习型企业首先要有正确的学习理念;同时要加强企业文化建设,不断提升组织的竞争力;不断提高企业技术创新能力,适应市场经济发展的需要;深化职工教育改革,建立现代企业教育制度.     

论森林公安“刑事科学技术”学科体系建设

从对建设森林公安"刑事技术"学科的必要性、不可替代性和可行性的角度,论述了森林公安"刑事技术"学科的内涵及其具体课程设置,并提出应根据森林公安工作的实际需要,打破课程原有系统,使相近的课程相互渗透交叉,组成知识群或技能群进行教学,以突出公安学科的应用型特色.     

Closing the Floodgates on Privacy Class Actions: Lloyd v Google LLC

In Lloyd v Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50, the Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeal's decision, which had allowed a claim under the Data Protection Act 1998 to proceed as a representative action under CPR 19.6. This is significant because the Court of Appeal's decision arguably paved the way for further data protection/privacy claims to be brought as opt-out ‘class actions’ using this procedure. This case note summarises the Supreme Court decision and assesses its implications for both the procedural law of collective redress and the substantive law of privacy in England. It argues that the Supreme Court's reasoning in relation to both of these areas is sound as a matter of precedent and statutory construction. As a matter of public policy, the decision is likely to re-enliven debate about the availability of collective redress in English law and whether the existing collective proceedings regime should be broadened.     

透过法医痕迹分析犯罪嫌疑人心理在命案侦破中的运用

法医痕迹是指在命案现场中反映在尸体上的痕迹和血迹等生物检材分布情况,在命案现场分析中,根据法医痕迹分析案件是介于法医、痕迹与侦查之间的一个桥梁,是新世纪法医工作与痕迹工作的延伸,把法医学与痕迹学结合起来,运用犯罪分子遗留在现场特别是尸体上的心理痕迹,对于提高命案现场分析的深度和广度、拓宽法医学和痕迹学的研究范围都具有积极而深远的意义。     

浅谈刑事技术与刑事侦查的协作

刑事技术与刑事侦查的关系是相互包容和密不可分的。侦技协作的基本内容包括人的结合、知识的结合和手段的配合。目前分局侦技协作的主要不足表现在:缺少协作意识;缺少现场意识;缺少沟通意识。所以,公安机关应多措施促进侦技协作。     

No Sheriff in Town: Governance for Online Dispute Resolution

Online dispute resolution (ODR), the practice of resolving disputes via the Internet or digital applications, has been developing since the mid‐1990s. As the field has grown and gained traction, it has increasingly received attention from professional associations and industry leaders in the world of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). More recently, it has begun to receive recognition from sources outside of this field — in both the public and private sectors. As the field develops and individual initiatives become widely adopted, the attention it receives from external sources will undoubtedly focus on questions of quality, ethics, practitioner training, service provider qualifications, and monitoring. These questions — already beginning to be heard from within the field — derive, in essence, from one shared overall question, that of appropriate governance for the ODR field. In this article, we will explain what we mean when we discuss a field's governance and suggest that the field itself should investigate issues of its own governance. We explore and explain the current “low‐to‐no” state of governance in ODR — and the developments that are likely, should the field fail to actively address this issue. We discuss the costs of no governance, and the potential costs and disadvantages of employing a higher‐governance model. We ask whether ODR can, indeed, be governed at all, and illustrate why addressing ODR governance is a very complex venture, in terms of the web of factors to be addressed, no matter how beneficial internal governance may be. We do not, in this article, intend to decide any of these questions — but, rather, to pose them to the ODR field and to the wider fields of ADR and conflict management. We point out why the ODR field is at a developmental point that is highly suitable for discussing and deciding these questions — and why these decisions might have far‐reaching implications for a wide range of conflict‐related fields.     

Regulatory Domain and Regulatory Dexterity: Critiquing the UK Governance of ‘Fracking’

This article provides a critique of the UK government's regulatory response to ‘fracking’. It shows how government has adopted two distinct schemas of regulation, which may usefully be classified under the headings ‘regulatory domain’ and ‘regulatory dexterity’. These schemas rely on very different interpretive conventions and are in many ways contradictory. Yet, government uses both ‘domain’ and ‘dexterity’ arguments simultaneously in order to advance its policy in favour of fracking. The article explains how two seemingly different regulatory approaches work together towards the same policy goal, and highlights the role of law in facilitating technological development.