范围责任规则——行政诉讼证明责任分配的依据

本文在界定证明责任概念的基础上,通过对行正诉讼和民事诉讼差异的分析,认为应当以修正规范说来确定行政诉讼证明责任的分配,并进而行出应当以范围责任规则作为行政诉讼证明责任分配依据的结论.     

程序与法律形式化——兼论现代法律程序的特征与要素

许多诉讼法学者认为 ,与其把程序法与实体法当作“形式与内容”的关系 ,不如把它看成“手段与目的”的关系。其实 ,程序法与实体法的关系 ,既是手段与目的的关系 ,又是形式与内容的关系。这就是说 ,程序既具有工具性 ,又具有形式性。     

“十四五”农村就业创业的战略思路与政策

“十三五”末期，内外部环境复杂多变、经济下行压力不断增加，不可避免地冲击着农村地区就业创业市场的稳定发展。为应对就业压力，“十四五”规划应将“稳就业、促创业”作为促进农村就业创业发展的基本方向，以保障农业生产安全、实现乡村振兴和全面建成小康社会为重点目标，按照“充分发挥第一产业就业‘稳定器’作用，提升农村二、三产业就业吸纳能力，增强农村创业环境吸引力，稳定农民工就业"的总体思路，全面推进农村地区实现高质量的就业创业新局面。为支撑“十四五”农村就业创业高质量发展，应将提高农村公共就业服务能力、完善农村创业政策体系、促进农村产业多样化以及吸引优秀人才、社会资本下乡等作为政策着力点，让农村地区成为全国新增就业的“蓄水池”。     

诉讼证明的客观标准与主观标准

本文认为 ,诉讼证明主观标准不能作为我国的诉讼证明标准 ,只有“事实清楚 ,证据确实充分”的客观证明标准是我国诉讼证明普遍适用的证明标准。     

论宪法的程序价值及其实现

宪法程序价值是与宪法规范的特点密切相联并反映宪法内在价值的主体在实施宪法程序过程中表现出来的满足主体需要的特性 ,它是解决程序价值冲突的价值 ,主要表现为程序的理性、正义与尊严、秩序与自由以及效率与公正等价值。宪法程序价值实现是一个层次性的主动实施宪法程序规范的过程     

主题、类型和规范:国内政治学研究的状况分析--以近十年复印报刊资料《政治学》中的论文为对象

目前，政治学研究的主体队伍在高等院校，研究的领域以政治理论为主，多侧重于规范性研究。经验研究由于本身水准的制约，使之尚难以上升至本科学专业刊物的主流位置。值得重视的问题还在于：不管是经验研究，还是规范研究。其规范性程度均有待大力提高。相当部分论文既缺少必要的“文献评论”，也不作任何“文献引证”；既缺失“问题意识”，更不能提出自身的理论假设。不过，近年间《政治学》论文规范性程度的大步提升，或许既显示了主流专业学术刊物对学术规范的重视，也预示了本学科研究中业已出现的值得鼓舞和追求的努力。     

刑法规范谦抑原则的根据

作为一项重要的刑法规范配置原则,谦抑原则的根据包括四个方面:刑法法律地位的决定、刑法人道化的要求、刑法有限性的使然与刑法经济性的体现。     

Why the EU Still Matters in Turkish Domestic Politics: Insights from Recent Reforms in Migration Policy

Abstract

In view of Turkey’s increasing distance from the European Union (EU), the continued partial alignment with EU standards is often attributed either to domestic factors, or to diffusion processes induced by external actors other than the EU. However, based on interviews with officials from Turkey and the European Commission on recent reforms in migration policy, this article argues that two factors are responsible for continued EU influence on policy processes. First, the EU is still able to set incentives for compliance. Second, the instrument for pre-accession assistance has an impact that goes beyond that of a mere facilitator of domestically defined interests.     

Why and how does the regulation of emerging technologies occur? Explaining the adoption of the EU General Data Protection Regulation using the multiple streams framework

Why and how the regulation of emerging technologies occurs is not clear in the literature. In this study, we adapt the multiple streams framework – often used for explaining agenda-setting and policy adoption – to examine the phenomenon. We hypothesize how technological change affects policy-making and identify conditions under which the streams can be (de-)coupled. We trace the formulation of the General Data Protection Regulation to show that the regulation occupied the legislative agenda when a policy window was exploited through policy entrepreneurship to frame technological change as a problem for data privacy and legislative harmonization within the European Union. Although constituencies interested in promoting internet technologies made every effort to stall the regulation, various actors, activities, and events helped the streams remain coupled, eventually leading to its adoption. We conclude that the alignment of problem, policy, politics, and technology – through policy entrepreneurship – influences the timing and design of technology regulation.     

Who coupled which stream(s)? Policy entrepreneurship and innovation in the energy–water nexus in Gujarat,India

Although policy entrepreneurship is essential for fostering policy innovations to achieve sustainable development, the literature has conflated different types of entrepreneurship and disaggregated it using inconsistent terminology. We conceptualize entrepreneurship using a six-stream variant of the multiple streams framework (MSF)—which addresses key limitations of the original MSF—to examine entrepreneurial activities in the case of the Jyotigram Yojana, a widely recognized policy innovation for managing the energy–water nexus in Gujarat, India. We find that whereas policy and political entrepreneurship no doubt played a significant role in coupling the streams and fostering this policy innovation, the process broker, program champion, and technology innovator were also important in policy formulation, implementation, and “success.” We conclude that the six-stream variant of MSF is useful for identifying and distinguishing various types of entrepreneurship involved in policy innovation for sustainability.