警体课人身伤害事故责任简析

警体课发生人身伤害事故的原因是多种多样的 ,不能笼统地归咎于学校、教师或学生。警体教师应增强法制观念 ,采取有效措施 ,防止伤害事故的发生 ,确保警体课的人身安全。     

人体基因财产权研究——“人格性财产权”的证成与施用

按照经典权利理论中人/物、人格权/财产权的二元界分逻辑,人体基因作为整全的人身的组成部分,处于人格权的保护之下,被禁止用于谋利性交易。然而,随着基因科技的发展及基因的产业化应用,人/物的界限被内移到了人自身,人体基因也日益外化而具有独立的经济价值。当基因科技的施为力量已在某种程度上消弭了经典权利理论所依仗的人/物二元界分的基础时,试图非此即彼地以人格权或财产权来界定人体基因的法律属性,都不会实现关于基因利益的公平分配和确保人格不被减等的结果。问题的出路,似乎在于在人格权和财产权的混同处,提出一个新的人格性财产权的范畴界定人体基因的法律属性,并综合运用人格权和财产权的保护机制来保障基因资源提供者的利益。     

16 STR data of a Greek population

Allele frequencies for 16 STR loci (D8S1179, D21S11, D7S820, CSF1PO, D3S1358, TH01, D13S317, D16S539, D2S1338, D19S433, vWA, TPOX, D18S51, D5S818, FGA, and SE33) were calculated for a sample of 300 unrelated individuals from Greece. No deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium were observed for all loci. The combined power of discrimination (PD) and the combined power of exclusion (PE) for the 16 tested STR loci were 0.999999999 and 0.999999816, respectively. Population comparisons were carried out and low genetic distances were found between our data and those previously published for other neighbouring European populations.     

对挪用公款罪中“归个人使用”的认识与理解

在司法实践中，审判机关对挪用公款案件的认定存在着较大的争议，应根据刑法的立法本意，运用法理学对其做出科学的界定。从刑法的任务，刑法的基本原则，挪出人和使用人的关系，危害行为与危害结果的关系等角度看，挪用公款罪中的“归个人使用”应理解为：“个人”是指挪出人．“使用”包括本人直接使用和间接使用，本人间接使用又包括给其它个人和单位具体使用。“使用”应从广义上去理解，它包括占有公款打算使用但还没有使用、使用预备、已经实际使用．且有一个共同的基础：个人占有公款。     

本案不构成挪用公款罪

挪用公款罪是一种严重的犯罪行为,其发案率很高,由于犯罪的复杂性和立法技术的问题,造成了无论在理论上还是在实践中,人们对它的认识存在较大的争议。本文主要从案例分析出发,并围绕挪用公款罪的犯罪构成、犯罪目的及归个人使用如何理解等问题来展开讨论。     

网络格式合同若干法律问题的探讨

消费者进行网上访问、参与电子商务交易活动大多通过订立网络格式合同进行,而网络格式合同作为人们从事电子商务活动的最主要的手段,在迅速发展起来的同时被赋予了新的内容和形式,不可避免地对传统的合同法律制度提出了挑战。基于此在探析网络格式合同的新内涵并分析和审视网络格式合同法律效力的基础上,提出借鉴外国相关立法和实践经验,针对电子商务交易进行单独立法和课以网络格式合同提供方以合理提示义务,加强行业协会监管作用等措施来规范网络格式合同使用过程中产生的法律关系。     

柏拉图与亚里士多德法律学说知识论基础比较

柏拉图和亚里士多德的制度追求之不同，源于各自的实证理论差异。基于对社会中人们的自利行为、知识分布和理性程度的不同判断以及判断上的强弱区别，他们理想的社会决策方式分别是哲学王式的集中控制和法治下的个人选择。     

ALL OFFENDERS ARE EQUAL,BUT SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS: VARIATION IN JOURNEYS TO CRIME BETWEEN OFFENDERS*

The results of this study reveal a major methodological problem with an established body of criminological literature—the journey to crime. The dominant finding of such research is that most crimes occur close to an offender's home. Consequently, journeys to crime typically display a distance-decay function that is assumed to exist between and within offenders. However, most journey-to-crime studies use nested data—individual offenders contributing multiple crime trips—yet employ analytic methods that fail to account for this property, leading to inference and aggregation concerns. In the study outlined in this article, we demonstrated the implications of using nested data for analyzing the journey to crime. We showed that once controlling for nesting, only a few (prolific) offenders display a distance decay pattern. Implications of the findings for theory and future research are discussed.     

Population data of eight X-chromosomal STR markers in Ewe individuals from Ghana

The investigation of the X-linked DNA markers are well established in the forensic routine case work. We studied an Ewe population sample from Ghana. The eight X-chromosomal STRs DXS10135, DXS8378, DXS7132, DXS10074, HPRTB, DXS10101, DXS10134 and DXS7423 were analyzed in 182 Ewe individuals (108 females and 74 males) from the region of Sogakofe (Ghana). Allele frequencies and statistical parameter as well as comparison with known data from Germans and with data from an Amharic population (Ethiopia) are presented.