再论社会主义初级阶段理论形成发展的理论依据与时代背景

从理论创新的理论基础和时代背景看,社会主义初级阶段理论的形成发展,有着深厚的思想理论来源和鲜明的历史时代背景;就理论创新的实践基础而言,社会主义初级阶段理论是以国内外社会主义建设正反两方面的历史经验教训为历史根据,以新中国60多年特别是改革开放30多年的成功实践为实践基础。     

The house size effect and the referendum paradox in U.S. presidential elections

Barthélémy et al. (2014), extending the work of Neubauer and Zeitlin (2003), show that some U.S. presidential elections are subject to a ‘House size effect’ in that the winner of the election, i.e., the candidate who wins a majority of electoral votes, depends on the size of the House of Representatives. The conditions for the effect relate to the number of ‘Senate’ versus ‘House’ electoral votes won by each candidate, but the relationship is not straightforward due to ‘locally chaotic’ effects in the apportionment of House seats among the states as House size changes. Clearly a Presidential election that is subject to the House size effect exhibits the referendum paradox, i.e., the electoral vote winner is the popular vote loser, for some House sizes but not for others.     

中小学生家庭教育现状的调查报告

我国独生子女在家长的倍加关爱下,常常以自我为中心,缺少合作意识,心理常有孤独感和寂寞感。传统家庭教育又存在着过度重视知识教育、缺少规划和指导等问题。新型的家庭教育应尊重孩子人格的发展,在价值取向上从知识型教育转向素质教育,使家庭教育逐步走向科学化。     

论江泽民对社会主义初级阶段理论的新阐发

实践的发展是永恒的,真理必将随着永恒发展的实践而不断发展。在建设中国特色社会主义的新的实践中,特别是十三届四中全会以来,以江泽民同志为核心的第三代中央领导集体对我国基本国情的认识和把握有了进一步深化和提高,对社会主义初级阶段理论进行了新的阐发,从多方面丰富和发展了社会主义初级阶段理论。     

犊牛前脂肪细胞的培养及其增殖与分化模型的建立

选择犊牛小肠网膜、附睾脂肪垫、腹部皮下脂肪组织材料 ,应用原代消化细胞培养法培养细胞。结果 ,由小肠网膜培养出了成分均一、增殖旺盛、分化率高的梭形细胞。经形态学动态变化观察、生长曲线测定、油红O脂肪染色及对胰岛素反应的测定 ,证明为功能活跃的前脂肪细胞 ,并在体外重现了其增殖、肥大的全过程。结果显示 ,小肠网膜脂肪组织存在着功能活跃的可调控的前脂肪细胞     

创新农民组织新模式的有益尝试——桂北农民组织建设的实践与思考

通过一种有效形式把分散经营的农户在诸多产业链上与市场连接起来,创建"党群致富联合体",实现农民共同富裕,是桂北农民的新尝试.     

腹部穿透创致腹腔积血的法医学鉴定

在法医学鉴定中,当暴力所致的原发损害与医疗过失行为造成的继发损害并存时,应区别“不可避免的”继发损害和“可以避免的”继发损害,并将原发损害与“不可避免的”继发损害一起,作为损伤程度鉴定的依据,而不能将“可以避免的”继发损害也作为损伤程度鉴定的依据。《人体重伤鉴定标准》第七十二条规定了外伤后腹部积血的鉴定原则,如何应用该条款评定损伤程度,需对原发损害与继发损害加以区别,同时,有必要对这一条款进行必要的修改。     

What does it mean to suffer loss? Haxton v Philips Electronics

In Haxton v Philips Electronics the Court of Appeal considered whether a widow could recover the diminution in value of her dependency claim following the defendant's tortious reduction of her life expectancy. The note outlines the development of the common law, demonstrating that Haxton is novel but not unorthodox, and tests whether Haxton's principles can provide a sound foundation for future cases. Positing three hypothetical scenarios, it argues that the disparity in outcome, rather than indicating a lack of unifying principle, as was suggested in Jobling v Associated Dairies, may be explained by combining Austin's division between primary and secondary rights with Gardner and Stevens' contributions as to how they are protected. Restitutio in integrum requires consideration of the reasons and values underlying the right in question and these are discernible in the jurisprudence. The note also considers whether Haxton could have been decided on the basis that a defendant should not profit from its own wrongdoing.     

Human Services Providers’ Perspectives on Refugee Resettlement in the United States before and after the 2016 Presidential Election

Abstract

The United States has historically accepted and resettled refugees by opening its doors to those fleeing violence, armed conflict, or persecution around the world. However, the degree of receptivity toward refugee resettlement has vacillated over time. This study examines the challenges and opportunities that Refugee Resettlement Agencies (RRAs) experienced prior to and after the 2016?U.S. Presidential election. The findings presented in this paper, based on focus groups with the RRA staff, revealed that there is a greater need for understanding the refugee resettlement process and how changing immigration policies impact state-federal funding.     

Checking the Fact-Checkers in 2008: Predicting Political Ad Scrutiny and Assessing Consistency

Which types of political ads are most likely to draw criticism from fact-checkers? Are fact-checkers consistent in their evaluations of political ads? Examining general election television ads from the 2008 U.S. presidential race, and based upon the evaluations of FactCheck.org, PolitiFact.com, and the Washington Post's Fact Checker, this study demonstrates it was the attack ads from candidates that were most likely to draw scrutiny from the fact-checkers. Most importantly, a high level of agreement between the fact-checkers indicates their success at selecting political claims that can be consistently evaluated. While political advertisers are increasingly using evidence to support their claims, what may be more critical in drawing evaluations from fact-checkers is the verifiability of a claim. The implications of consistent fact-checking on the public, political actors, journalism and democracy are discussed. With the revelation that fact-checking can be consistently practiced, localized efforts at fact-checking need encouragement, particularly as political TV ads increasingly drown out other potential sources of information for the public and increasingly are used in downballot races, local initiatives, referendums and judicial races.