Negotiating the Marcellus: The Role of Information in Building Trust in Extractive Deals

New technology has expanded the opportunities for energy companies within the United States, often bringing them into populated communities and requiring them to negotiate deals with landowners. This case study focuses on how one group of landowners in northeastern Pennsylvania creatively reimagined the process of negotiating in a natural gas deal. They used collective bargaining for leverage, and the Internet and social media to level the informational playing field. These techniques allowed them to develop trust within the group and ultimately with one company, as they sought to protect their environment and enhance their financial gain.     

On the Regulation of the Discretion of Environmental Administrative Punishment: Based on the Framework of the Modernized Environment Governance System

With the increasing environmental risks, the limitations of legislative regulation, negative judicial regulation and weak administrative regulation make it difficult to regulate the exercise of the discretion of environmental administrative punishment, which also increases the difficulty of the implementation of environmental administrative penalty decisions. The government, enterprises and the public three-dimensional main body structure constructed by the modern environmental governance system provides a new framework for the discretionary regulation of environmental administrative punishment. Based on the traditional theories of administrative Law, three regulation mechanisms can be formed,which include administrative self-control, negotiation regulation, and the social regulation. These three regulatory mechanisms working together in the whole process of environmental administration would regulate and restrict the exerting of discretion of environmental administrative punishment.     

论人质谈判场

人质谈判场包括关系场、环境场和话语场。谈判场中影响和制约人质谈判的因素很多。警方针对每一场人质危机的谈判,都应该做到知彼知己,有的放矢,应通过场上和场下等渠道,多方采集相关信息,并及时、科学分析,正确研判,充分利用其有利面而规避其不利面。只有这样,警方才能有效把握谈判的主动权,顺利化解人质危机。     

跨文化谈判中的文化差异——美国与日本人的谈判行为比较

随着国际间贸易的增长和经济全球化的影响,跨文化谈判中的文化差异问题已引起广泛关注。属于不同文化的不同思维形式、不同沟通方式、不同行为方式的谈判行为具有非常大的挑战性。当代日本和美国的交流行为是两种极为不同甚至经常相互抵触的文化传统的产物。这个问题将从谈判过程、思维方式、决策过程等几个方面显露无疑。     

1945年美英贸易谈判和GATT的起源

1945年美英围绕战后国际贸易体制问题展开了一场外交攻防战,出于世界领导权、商业利益及对苏战略的需要,美国放弃了多边自由贸易纲领,转而采取多边谈判程序的安排,形成了美国构筑战后国际贸易体制的政策目标和方法,为多边贸易谈判体制———GATT的产生铺平了道路。     

人质解救的新理念——谈判专家中心论

人质解救属于高难度的战术,光靠武力难以成功,与犯罪人谈判是在所难免的。而我国警方现在极其缺乏专业谈判人员,各地纷纷采取措施培养谈判专家,这可能只是"头痛医头,脚痛医脚"的短视行为。必须树立以谈判专家为中心的人质解救理念,从制定科学的培训计划、应急预案、现场指挥体系和现场处置策略等方面着手,以此才能架构起长效的危机处理机制。     

我国内地与港澳的区际司法协助与机制构建

我国内地与港澳之间的区际司法协助是由《基本法》设定,并具有自身特殊规律的一种法律合作形式。它以特别行政区的高度自治和独立司法权为基础,通过各主体之间的平等协商来具体实施。因三地的法律制度差异较大,又缺乏上位法和上位司法权协调机制,在具体合作和制度建设中遇到不少难题,亟待更新观念,从理论与实务两个层面进行突破。各法域应在"一国两制"方针的指导下,按照相互尊重、主动合作、注重程序、效率优先的原则构建合作机制和开展司法协助,为区域经济发展和社会稳定提供法制保障。     

对轻生自杀干预谈判原则的探讨

自杀现象剧增问题,已成为当今社会一个非常严重的社会问题。由警方派出专业的谈判人员进行轻生自杀干预、对其施行人道主义救助,已成为警方不可忽视的一项重要工作任务。要想取得谈判的最大成功,警方谈判人员就应该掌握自杀干预谈判的基本原则、避开操作误区。文章对自杀干预谈判原则中的尊重原则、倾听原则及动情原则进行了阐述,以期为提高自杀干预谈判成功率有所裨益。     

人质危机谈判的阶段性策略

人质危机谈判通常分为谈判初始阶段，实质性谈判阶段和结束谈判阶段。在谈判的不同阶段，劫持者的心理状态有所不同，谈判使用的策略与方法也有所差异。谈判初始阶段的主要策略是稳定情绪，建立互信，会同攻击单位共同制订运送、接收、投降和攻击方案。实质性谈判阶段的重，最是策略性地处理要求与期限。谈判结束阶段应做好和平结束与武力结束两种可能的准备。谈判人员要根据各阶段形势发展，采用相应的有效谈判策略，有序地处理人质危机。