论刑事诉讼中被害人的权利救济

在我国当前的刑事附带民事诉讼中,被害人的权利往往不能得到有效救济。列举被害人权利救济时出现的三个问题:侵财型犯罪的被害人的权利难得救济、被害人无法在刑事附带民事诉讼中提起精神损害赔偿,司法实践中的"先刑后民"原则存在的问题,并提出一些立法建议及完善措施。     

论“商事通则”立法的国际化

在全球化背景下,现代商法的国际性本质以及现代市场交易的特征决定了"商事通则"的构建必须具有国际化的思路。我们应以开放的心态打造"商事通则"的理性架构;以内外一体化的模式设计"商事通则"的具体制度;以商事救济制度的自裁性和与国际惯例的接轨彰显"商事通则"的国际化。     

公权力下的罪犯私权保障探析

随着社会文明的进步发展，监狱作为国家专门行刑机关．在对罪犯实施惩罚改造的同时。对罪犯依法享有的人身权利和与人身有关的其他权利给予保护，并制定了一系列保障措施，但由于重刑主义在人们头脑中根深蒂固，人们不把罪犯视为同类的心理以及相关法律保障制度的不完善，致使罪犯权利往往得不到有效的保护。为适应社会主义法治建设不断发展的要求，作为国家法律文明窗口的监微，有必要建立健全保障罪犯权利的法律制度。     

Entangled history and politics: Negotiating the past between Namibia and Germany

The relationship between Namibia and Germany is marked by intense exchanges about the meaning and the consequences of the colonial wars of the early twentieth century in the erstwhile German colony. This engages various state and civil society actors including groups from across the political spectrum in Germany, whereas in Namibia the debate concerns the descendants of the victims on the one hand and German-speaking Namibians on the other.

The article explores this discursive situation and brings out a range of relationships and interactions to be understood as expressions of an entangled history that eschews attempts of appropriation on one side. The problems emerge most poignantly in terms of the still ongoing exchanges around the denial of genocide in 1904–8 which, given that the framework of the debate is predicated to considerable measure on German history, inevitably points to the Holocaust. A further strand of acting out and negotiating historical responsibility concerns the mode of apology and redress which remains a contended question. Not least, this involves an incoherent set of state and non-state actors on both sides. Here, the call for dialogue made particularly by Namibians raises the sensitive issues of intercultural communication.     

论公司僵局的法律救济——兼评新《公司法》183条

公司僵局在我国公司实践中经常发生,我国2005年修订的公司法对解决公司僵局问题作出了原则性的规定,但随着我国新公司法的实施,公司僵局问题在实践中仍有许多盲区,基于此,作者运用比较分析等方法,对公司僵局的概念、形成原因、种类及处理公司僵局的原则,公司僵局的法律救济途径进行了理论和实践的探讨,以期对此问题有更深入的了解。     

Degrees of freedom in Canada's culture of redress

This article examines some recent Canadian projects of historical narrative revision in light of Canada's broader redress culture: the recurring norms and assumptions that govern its apportionment of causal and reparative responsibility for historic wrongs. To this end, it studies several grassroots commemorative projects funded under the Community Historical Recognition Program. It asks whether these projects contribute to forging a broader culture of redress capable of contributing to a goal that this article identifies as a central underlying justification for enterprises of historical justice in general: democratizing citizenship. Thus, the article aims to fulfil two main objectives. First, it offers an empirical analysis of some important Canadian historical justice initiatives, thus contributing to our understanding of a case often seen as a leader in redress politics. Second, by developing and then applying its own account of how historical justice projects can contribute to goals of democratic citizenship, the article offers what I hope is a suggestive model for analysing and evaluating particular acts or policies of historical redress more generally. A key conclusion from this analysis is that the Canadian example is much less inspiring than often assumed.