用经济学原理分析我国公安内保体制改革

我国现行的内保体制存在许多缺陷，在实践中面临着许多新问题，公安内保部门应转变观念，顺应改革要求，彻底转变职能，采取灵活的、适合市场经济体制要求的管理手段，在加强管理的同时，更加注重提供优质的服务。     

Explaining differences in EMAS participation rates across Europe: the importance of institutions,incomplete information and path dependence

What factors shape environmental policies across Europe? In order to answer this question most economists would probably adopt a Public Choice approach. This approach has convincingly explained some aspects of environmental policies that exist in a similar fashion across Europe. But why do many environmental policies differ across European countries? This article argues that in order to understand differences in environmental policies in Europe North’s analysis of institutional change focusing on formal and informal institutions, incomplete information and path dependence is useful. North’s approach is applied to explain differences in a particular field of European environmental policy: The implementation of the EU’s Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) in Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK. The starting point of the analysis is the observation that participation of companies in EMAS markedly differs between countries. It is shown that these differences can be explained with differences in formal and informal institutions in the three Member States, incomplete information of relevant actors, and path dependence.     

劳动力市场与劳动关系中的政府规制研究

如何更好地发挥政府的作用以维护劳动力市场与劳动关系的稳定和谐,对社会和经济发展具有重要意义。本研究基于制度经济学的观点,分析政府对劳动力市场与劳动关系中公平和效率的规制问题。本研究认为:政府规制是劳动力市场自由、高效运行的保障;劳动力市场失灵是企业存在和劳动关系产生的前提;政府规制可以提高劳动力市场和劳动关系中的效率,并解决其存在的公平问题。为进一步提升政府的规制效率,本研究建议:建立统一劳动力市场,消除市场分割;完善集体协商制度,促进工资形成机制;建立适应中国灵活性用工的劳动法规政策。     

Neoinstitutionalism: Still no intellectual hegemony?

Despite its greater realism, neoinstitutionalism has not been able to rival neoliberal approaches in the minds of many public‐policy communities. This article suggests four reasons why this is the case: the way that neoliberalism appears to be rooted in the strong paradigms of neoclassical economics, the related simple appeal of marketization as a solution to policy problems, the dominance of short‐term calculation in financial markets as the apparently most successful form of economic activity, and the role of corporate actors as public‐policy insiders. It is argued that an essential solution to the problem is a rapprochement between neoinstitutionalism and neoclassical economics, which is itself not necessarily wedded to neoliberalism.     

经济法学的基本假设

法学研究之深入 ,端赖于范式转换 ,经济法学研究更是如此。以往之法学研究 ,较为偏重权利 -义务结构分析 ,这固然重要 ,但已显不足。本文基于对“复杂性问题”进行多维审视的需要 ,运用法与经济学的理论对经济法研究的几个基本假设进行了探讨。     

论权利

人与世界具有三层关系 :意识关系、支配关系和权利关系。在意识关系 (主体与客体的关系 )中 ,主体与客体互为前提 ,相互渗透 ,意识关系不具有排他性。在支配关系(支配主体与支配客体的关系 )中 ,支配一方面是主体对客体片面的必然性的扬弃 ,另一方面也是客体对主体片面的必然性的扬弃。在权利关系 (权利主体与权利客体的关系 )中 ,法通过对个别意志的肯定和否定使主体拥有了支配的自由和可能 ,使支配主体的支配具有了随意性和排他性 ,使支配被划分为合法的支配和非法的支配。这种对个别意志的肯定和否定的统一 ,支配的自由与可能的统一 ,进行支配的随意性与排他性的统一 ,就是权利     

Product Liability: A Neo-Austrian Based Perspective

The paper is an exercise in a neo-Austrian based economic analysis of product liability. After a short historical introduction, we take two of the basic premises of Austrian economic thought and see which system of product liability results. If costs are subjective and entrepreneurship is the essence of an efficient market process, a system of caveat emptor and vendor results. For judges to assess damages, in the way others advocate judges to do, judges would need to measure costs, something that cannot be done according to Austrian economics. The paper also answers some possible criticisms from the mainstream neoclassical perspective.     

The Public Interest Theory of Regulation: Non-Existence or Misinterpretation?

The Public Interest Theory of regulation explains, in general terms, that regulation seeks the protection and benefit of the public at large. This paper argues that possibly the Public Interest Theory does not exist as such for reasons that will be discussed later. In addition, the paper contends that the Stigler's and Posner's characterisation of the Public Interest Theory has similarities with the welfare economics rationale for regulation. Nevertheless, the similarities do not prove or deny a connection between both the concepts of public interest and the welfare economics rationale for regulation.     

西方非主流经济学的消费行为理论述评

无论是西方主流经济学还是非主流经济学的消费行为理论，都具有十分明显的时代特征，是理论的历史承袭性和修正性的结晶。因此，诸家理论都表现出一定的局限性，有待进一步修正，深化，拓展和整和，但这并不诋毁其应用价值，深入研究这些理论，有利于我们在不同的时期选择适宜的政策，引导和刺激居民消费行为沿着正确的方向发展。     

著作权合理使用及其经济学分析

合理使用是指在一定的条件下不经著作权人的许可,也不必向其支付报酬而对作品所进行的使用。在经济学看来,著作权法中的合理使用体现了著作权法实施的社会成本和收益间的平衡。其中交易成本分析方法运用于合理使用制度中,侧重于交易成本损害了自愿许可协议的达成从而导致市场失败的情形。合理使用还可以运用新古典经济学原理分析。