改革开放三十年我国法律本质理论的回顾

从20世纪70年代末期开始,中国进入了一个新的历史发展时期,中国社会内部的变革因素开始推动法理学和法律本质理论向前发展。法学界围绕法律的阶级性与社会性的相互关系,对法律本质进行了多视角、多层面的探讨,力图论证法律本质是正义性、阶级性、社会性和物质制约性的统一,主张用马克思关于阶级意志性和物质制约性相统一的原理、市民社会和政治国家相互关系的原理、法与法律关系的原理来深化和发展法律本质理论,建构与社会主义初级阶段相适应的、集自治性与开放性于一体的法律本质理论体系。     

确实发生了误读——与李昌庚先生商榷

从经济法、民商法、行政法与市场经济的关系入手,探讨在市场经济建立过程中经济法、民商法和行政法所扮演的角色,并论证“转轨经济法”提出的客观现实社会经济基础,对反驳“转轨经济法”的观点进行了较为详尽的正本清源,明确“转轨经济法”之所以在中国现阶段取代“市场经济法”来构建中国市场经济的原因。     

论董事的概念

从形式意义上而言,董事是由公司选任产生的经营决策者或管理者;从实质意义上来说,董事是处于董事职位上的任何人。但形式意义上的界定具有明显不足。董事不仅是一种身份或职位,更是一个功能性概念。在公司实践中,某些主体并不具有董事职位或身份,却行使着董事的职权,或者对公司施加经营决策上的影响,成为公司自主经营的一种外在的异己力量。另外,一些董事的职责和功能被侵蚀或扭曲,成为了一种异己力量或者变异的身份。各国立法对这些现象的规制有一定的差异。我国立法上对上述问题的规定急需完善。     

阮氏政权时期华侨华人对越南社会经济发展的贡献

本文主要从农业、商业、矿业、建筑业、养蚕和剿丝业等几个方面分析阮氏政权时期华侨华人对越南经济发展的贡献.中国移民移居越南,是更大范围的传统农业文明内部的人口流动、资源开发和技术传承.他们没有而且也不可能打破或超越传统的生产方式,创造出工业文明所创造的物质财富和精神文化成就.     

建立合作和谐的劳动关系构建社会主义和谐社会

劳动生存利益是人类社会共生共存的基础,劳动关系是一切社会关系的基础,劳动关系的和谐是社会和谐的前提.严重不均衡的劳动关系状况会影响一个国家的经济发展和国际竞争力,影响一个国家的政治稳定和社会发展.由于制度缺失,我国劳动关系已出现严重的不均衡,必须用科学发展观重新审视我国的劳动政策,着力加强和谐劳动关系的制度建设,培养适应市场经济要求,能真正承担责任、履行义务的劳动关系主体.     

浅析北京会展及奖励旅游业现状及发展趋势

国际旅游业中有一个细分市场叫做“MICE”即“会展及奖励旅游市场”,它包括:一般会议(Meeting)、奖励旅游(Incentive)、大型会议(Convention)和展览(Exhibition)。对于“MICE”,国内外旅游理论界比较一致的认识是“会展及奖励旅游”。近年来,会展旅游业发展迅速,成为旅游经济发展的新支点,对旅游业的发展起到了至关重要的作用。对于会展旅游业的研究也成为国内旅游界研究的重点之一。     

对当前我国非公有制经济发展的分析与判断

新的形势促使我国非公有制企业与其他所有制企业联合,混合所有制企业将普遍存在;未来几年,我国一批非公有制企业将向科技型转型,并出现投资者的年轻化和高学历化、公司小型化、技术高级化、产业集群化;充分利用经济全球化的有利契机,非公有制企业也应“走出去”。     

Funds sharing regulation in the context of the sharing economy: Understanding the logic of China's P2P lending regulation

“Sharing economy” is an umbrella term that encompasses a wide range of digital platform-based activities that includes P2P lending and other forms of internet-based lending. The core aim of the sharing economy is to leverage the utilization of idle capacity. P2P lending can not only be used to leverage small amounts of money on the lender's side, but also be used to promote financial democracy and inclusion both on the lender and borrower's sides. P2P lending regulation, therefore, should place an emphasis on the utilization of dead money and promotion of financial democracy. This article scrutinizes the regulation of P2P lending in China. The existing regulatory system for P2P lending in China is built upon rules and regulations that have been designed solely with traditional brokers in mind. The article contends that the rigid rules placed on lending platforms limited their ability to maintain their roles as brokers and, in turn, heavily endangered the commercial sustainability of P2P platforms, thereby harming the sharing economy's openness and inclusivity. Additionally, the article argues that the fact that there is no limit on the amount a lender can invest poses a threat to the notions of leveraging idle money and financial inclusivity. The closed-ended P2P lending regime in China would cause some chilling effects to financial innovation in the P2P lending industry, and in a wider sense, the rising FinTech sector. Regulators in China need to cope with these challenges in a flexible but pragmatic manner, and particularly make use of the benefits the sharing economy may bring to the Chinese economy more broadly.     

互联网时代乡村振兴战略的路径选择——基于梅家坞村的调查研究

新一代信息技术和网络技术,正重塑乡村社会文化经济生态链。互联网带来的信息高速流通、思维变革,对此前在信息获取处于弱势地位的乡村带来系列影响。文章运用文献研究、问卷调查及半结构式访谈方法,通过对西湖区梅家坞村的个案解读与剖析,呈现梅家坞村社会经济和产业协作状况,论述互联网在农民生产、消费、交易和娱乐方式等方面引发的变革,并发现当前梅家坞村存在产业协作低、生产周期性漫长、文化缺失等问题,再由经济、社会、文化三个维度,探讨乡村新经济范式下梅家坞村如何构建经济-社会-文化共同体,如何以产业化带动乡村治理现代化。互联网时代梅家坞的社会经济发展,对其他地区乡村振兴也具有一定借鉴意义。     

“PARADOX OF ENGLISH LAND LAW” — AN ENLIGHTENMENT TO LAND LAW REFORM IN CHINA

Since the founding of New China in 1949, the land law system with Chinese characteristics has been formed based on various practices, inter alia, the evolution of the rural land law system from the agrarian reform to the cooperative and people’s communes and further to the household contract responsibility system, which made historical contributions to the development of Chinese social economy. However, with the development of the practices and the deepening of the reform, China’s land law system is facing great challenges under the new circumstances. Although many differences exist between English land law and Chinese land law in the areas of legal form, the regulated objects and contents, English land law can provide some beneficial enlightenment to China’s land law reform. Particularly, the “paradox of English land law,” which presents the way how the English land law, as the law adjusting the basic property relations with many traditional factors, responds to the process of social and economic development with leaps and bounds.