关于警民关系与社会稳定的思考

社会稳定是国家建设发展的保障,是国家繁荣昌盛的根基。保障社会稳定是公安机关的任务,也是公安工作的最终目的。警民关系是政群关系在社会上最直接的反映,体现着国家的执政状况、民主程度和文明进程,也是影响社会稳定的关键因素。警民和谐不仅是公安机关履行本职工作的重要基础,更是社会稳定的题中要义。     

论维护社会稳定机制的构建

社会转型与变迁时期社会极不稳定,社会动荡与社会发展的机遇相互并存。要抓住发展的机遇,必须全力维护社会的稳定。在借鉴社会冲突理论的基础上,结合中国的国情,着力构建适合中国国情的维稳机制：提高政府执政能力是化解社会冲突维护社会稳定的关键;构建适应社会发展的法律体系,充分发挥法律维护社会稳定的功能;建立＂社会共享价值观＂是化解社会冲突维护社会稳定的要求;公安机关社会管理创新是整个社会管理创新的重要组成部分。     

国内政治稳定理论研究述评

政治稳定是每一个政治体系追求的重要价值目标之一。对于合理政治秩序的追求是人类政治生活的基本价值目标，处于每个历史时期的政治思想家都会程度不同地关注政治秩序和政治稳定问题。     

全面开创公安工作新局面

在新世纪,公安机关必须始终把维护社会政治稳定放在首位;严厉打击刑事犯罪活动,提高驾驭社会治安局势的能力;强化服务意识,为经济建设提供优质服务;狠抓基层基础工作、推动公安工作持续发展.     

学习贯彻江泽民稳定治国思想

作为第三代领导集体核心 ,江泽民同志颇多理论建树 ,稳定治国思想即为其一。该思想包括意义地位论、系统关系论、领导中心论、主体基础论、队伍保障论、途径机制论等相互联系、共成整体的六个方面内容 ,博大精深 ,全面系统。必须以江泽民稳定治国思想指导各项工作 ,维护安定团结的局面。     

中国传统社稷安全观略论

国家安全是政治学研究的学科热点之一,而社稷安全是国家传统安全观研究中的一环。从学理上看,社稷安全曾历经多次威胁,包括王权统治的制度性威胁"谋大逆"与"谋反",内部威胁"寇贼"与外部威胁"外敌"等多重问题。而在此基础上形成的社稷安全观,也具有双重性、内向性和多元平衡性的特点。第一是强调文化与武力的同等重要。传统社稷安全观对文化安全观非常重视。从内外两个方面上看,一方面在家国同构的基础上大力维护儒家的伦理观念,另一方面是以文明传播的形式构建在地缘政治中的身份认同,从而确立整体的和谐共处前景。第二是强调政治管理的作用,即在国家安全因素中凸显内因高于外因的特点。决定国力的根本在于内部的稳定,而王朝的职责在于维持经济生产的有序和政治管理的清明。基于这一条件,传统社稷安全观呈现出很强的内向性和保守性,同时对外部武力进犯非常敏感。第三是追求以"分封制"为核心的异质文明间非暴力统一的共处关系。在一个文明图内有共同的政治偶像——孔子,共同的政治标准——"儒家"和共同的政治理想——"和"。     

Democratic justice: the priority of politics and the ideal of citizenship

In his Democratic justice and the social contract, Weale presents a distinctive contingent practice-dependent model of ‘democratic justice’ that relies heavily on a condition of just social and political relations among equals. Several issues arise from this account. Under which conditions might such just social and political relations be realised? What ideal of equality is required for ‘democratic justice’? What are its implications for the political ideal of citizenship? This paper focuses on these questions as a way to critically reconsider Weale’s model. After presenting Weale’s procedural constructivism, I distinguish his model from an institutional practice-dependent model, one salient example of which is Rawls’s political constructivism. This distinction allows for a formulation of the social and political equality required for justice in each case. The contingent model assumes that an equality of ‘status’ will generate just social practices, yet it fails to recognise that an equality of ‘role’ is also important to ensure citizens’ compliance. The paper ultimately seeks to show that the contingent model is insufficient to ensure that just social practices will become stable.     

Debt in just societies: A general framework for regulating credit

Debt presents a dilemma to societies: successful societies benefit from a substantial infrastructure of consumer, commercial, corporate, and sovereign debt but debt can cause substantial private and social harm. Pre‐crisis and post‐crisis solutions have seesawed between subsidizing and restricting debt, between leveraging and deleveraging. A consensus exists among governments and international financial institutions that financial stability is the fundamental normative principle underlying financial regulation. Financial stability, however, is insensitive to equality concerns and can produce morally impermissible aggregations in which the least advantaged in a society are made worse off. Solutions based only on financial stability can restrict debt without accounting for the risk of harm to persons least able to bear the risk, worsen preexisting inequalities, destroy or impair the net worth of households, and impose unfavorable distributive consequences. This article offers a new approach to assist policymakers in developing and evaluating regulation to take criteria in addition to financial stability into account, but which do not undermine the aim of financial stability. It calls for a luck egalitarian approach, offering policymakers options to take the debtor's choices into account while still accounting for cognitive mistakes people often make in debt decisionmaking. It offers a general framework for the underlying principles for the regulation of debt: its focus is not on any particular forms of debt or its regulation but in structuring debt regulation more generally. It offers a set of recommendations on how regulators can take concerns about luck and equality into account in regulatory design.     

健全完善京津冀协同维稳工作机制研究

疏解北京非首都功能是京津冀协同发展的重中之重。这是一项庞大的系统工程,涉及面广,利益关系复杂,对京津冀地区的社会稳定将带来持续深远的影响。外迁企业、重大工程建设、基础设施配套等多方面会触及区域内居民的切身利益,容易引发一系列社会矛盾,并进而影响社会稳定特别是首都的安全稳定。尽管京津冀三地的协同维稳工作机制已运转多年,成效显著,但仍有不尽如人意的地方,需要本着“民生问题无小事,群众利益大于天”的原则,坚持源头治理,进一步健全完善京津冀协同维稳工作机制。     

社区工会:工会参与社会管理创新的微观载体

城市社区工会作为基层工会组织,因其紧贴社会生活实际,紧密联系职工群众实际,应当成为工会参与社会管理创新的微观载体.社区工会在参与社会管理创新实践中,通过开展丰富多彩的活动,履行其社会职能,最大限度地吸引职工、服务职工和团结职工,切实维护职工权益,为构筑健康和谐的城市社区,为实现维权维稳发挥其不可替代的、重要的社会支柱作用.