领导干部宪法意识问卷调查与实证分析

公民是否具有良好的法律意识乃至法律信仰 ,历来是法治的重要实现条件。而其中宪法意识又是国民法律意识的核心部分 ,尤其是党政领导干部如何看待和认识宪法 ,将在很大程度上决定和影响国民乃至整个国家的宪法态度。本文在大量问卷调查和统计的基础上 ,客观描述了我国领导干部的宪法意识现状 ,分析了领导干部宪法意识的特点 ,对提高培养领导干部宪法意识的途径也进行了有益的探索。     

关于南京市杜区从业人员状况的调查与思考

随着城市现代化建设进程的不断加快,社区逐渐成为就业的一方热土,成为吸纳下岗失业人员的"蓄水池".对此,南京市总工会对南京市城区相关社区的200名从业人员的就业状态、分布领域及生存现状等情况进行了调查,并在此基础上对社区从业者的状况以及社区服务业的走向进行了初步探讨.     

刑法谦抑性之司法现状审视

众所周知,刑法因其惩罚的严厉性要求刑法适用必须遵循谦抑性的原则。目前实务界在适用中存在违背谦抑性的种种表现：不考虑情节构罪即移送起诉、某些罪名过度适用、被问责主体扩大等。要实现刑法的谦抑性,不单要阐述刑法所具有的谦抑品格,更重要的任务应在实务层面将谦抑精神落到实处,在刑法适用者心中树立一个标杆,塑造谦抑刑法适用的环境。     

高校学生社团发展调查报告——以浙江省高校为例

对浙江省高校学生社团发展的调查发现,高校学生社团存在会员认识不清、活动质量欠佳、衔接传承不够等问题,应向社会化运作、系统化管理、品牌化建设方向发展,从而构建真正体现当代教育特色的高校社团。     

少数民族文化传承综论

文化传承与文化保护主义者所提倡的静态保护不同,它强调的是一个动态的过程。在这个动态的过程中,发展民族经济的同时也传承和发展民族文化。民族传统文化是少数民族村寨发挥比较优势、发展旅游经济、通向现代性的重要依托。     

"人就是人的中介"复论

人的本质在于人的对象性关系.人的对象性关系之"为我"的意义,表征着对象性关系中的"人的根本就是人本身","人是人的最高本质"."人"作为"人的最高本质",在于打破人的奴役关系而"解放成为人"或"人的解放".而人的解放,在于"批判的武器"和"武器的批判"是否作为人的中介被人所占有.     

Disentangling the Effects of Bounding and Mobility on Reports of Criminal Victimization

Replacement respondents who move into NCVS households after the initial bounding interview can introduce measurement error since their reports of victimization may be influenced by their mobility (actual experiences) and by their unbounded interview status (response error). Which of these factors affects reporting is unknown and is the focus of this research. The availability of incoming respondent data from the NCVS School Crime Supplement and mobility status from the NCVS provides a unique opportunity to study these effects separately. Both bounding and mobility were found to influence reporting; however, this influence was not consistent. Unlike findings from past research, bounding only had significant effects on reports of property victimization. Conversely, moving only significantly affected reports of violent victimization. As this study is the first to disentangle the effect of unbounded interview status from mobility on reports of victimization, the findings emphasize the need for further research to better understand these issues.     

Values,Frames, and Persuasion in Presidential Nomination Campaigns

This paper examines the persuasability of rhetorical value framing within a presidential nominating campaign, in an effort to understand how values and value-laden language may provide useful signals in electoral contexts where partisan cues are absent. Relying on a survey-experiment conducted during the 2000 Republican nomination campaign, I evaluate the relative persuasiveness of arguments framed in either individualistic or egalitarian terms. Drawing upon an “active-receiver” model of framing effects, I posit that Republican primary voters respond more readily to candidates when they use individualistic frames than when they use egalitarian frames, because individualism is a more “chronically accessible” value construct for Republicans. Furthermore, I hypothesize that this dynamic is particularly pronounced among more educated respondents, who have been trained to recognize abstract value cues and automatically apply them to applied political contexts. The experimental findings support these hypotheses.     

试析“三个代表”重要思想赋予新闻职业道德的新内涵

"三个代表"重要思想对我们的新闻职业道德教育与建设,具有极其重要的指导意义,它赋予了新闻职业道德新的内涵,新闻媒介的从业人员必须加强对"三个代表"重要思想的学习和实践,才能使传媒最大限度地发挥好传播信息、舆论引导的作用.     

Property Crime Victims' Decision to Notify the Police: Social,Cognitive, and Affective Determinants

Previous research suggests that 3 general processes underlie the decision of property crime victims to notify the police: One that is cognitively driven by reward/cost considerations, one that is affectively driven, and another that is socially driven. This study is the first to employ a community sample of crime victims to compare the 3 processes within a single study. Computer-assisted interviews were conducted with 422 property crime victims (n = 129 burglary, n = 293 theft) located via a random digit dialing procedure. Logistic regression analyses showed that each process independently accounted for a significant amount of the variance in victim reporting, and that there were no interactions among the three processes in predicting reporting. Of the 3 processes, social influence was the best predictor of reporting. Analysis of the affect-driven process showed that reporting was primarily a function of the level of fear rather than anger or the level of generalized arousal upon discovering the crime.