刑事公诉权性质研究

刑事公诉权是检察权最核心的部分,公诉权的性质定位是否合理直接影响到刑事诉讼保护人权和打击犯罪两大目标的实现。从我国宪政的合理架构以及诉讼机制的平衡出发,从保证成文法律统一正确实施的角度去分析,公诉权的性质定位于法律监督权。     

A Framework for Thinking About Oppression and Its Change

This paper provides a framework for thinking about oppression and how to overcome it. It considers the value premise underlying the use of the term “oppression.” It then discusses the nature of oppression, the forms it takes, and what keeps it in place. In its final two sections, it focuses on awakening the sense of injustice and the strategies and tactics for overcoming injustice. An earlier version of this paper, entitled “Oppression and Conflict,” was presented as a plenary address at the Annual meeting of the International Society of Justice Research in Skovde, Sweden on June 17, 2002. This paper was the starting point of an ongoing, informal seminar on social justice held at Teachers College, Columbia University. The other participants in the seminar included Peter Coleman, Michelle Fine, Beth Fisher-Yoshida, Janet Gerson, Eric Marcus, Susan Opotow, Ellen Raider, Esther Salomon, Janice Steil, and Melissa Sweeney. From the discussions of theory, research, and practice during the meetings of the seminar, emerged plans for a Conference on Interrupting Oppression and Sustaining Justice. Its aim was to stimulate interaction about overcoming oppression among scholars from different academic fields, social and political activists, and graduate students in different disciplines. The Conference took place on February 27 and 28, 2004 at Teachers College. This issue of Social Justice Research presents some papers that were prepared before the Conference (and revised afterwards) and some that emerged from the Conference. Other papers from the Conference can be found under the heading of IO&SJ at the website of the International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution of Teachers College: http://www.tc.edu/icccr/.     

反核生化恐怖作战中防化兵的心理素质培养

防化兵的心理状态对于武警防化分队执行反核生化恐怖袭击保障任务具有重要作用。应从防化兵心理状态分析入手,结合其专业的心理素质要求,探讨防化兵的心理培养与训练基本方法。     

公诉环节办理未成年人犯罪案件探讨

本文从未成年人犯罪的现状出发，论述了在公诉环节用特殊方式办理未成年人犯罪案件的原因及重要性，指出对未臧年人犯罪案件要用不同于成年人犯罪的方式办理，在办理中必须体现宽严相济的刑事政策精神。     

刑事诉讼权利宪法化的国际趋势与借鉴

刑事诉讼权利宪法化始于美国,并呈现出国际化发展趋势。考察美国宪法与"权利法案"的形成背景,展现的是人权保护意识的逐步深化和制度完善的过程,特别是宪法权利可诉性的确立将其上升到操作层面。我国宪法在赋予公民权利的同时也有特殊保护条款,为顺应国际潮流,加大人权保护力度,应当审慎借鉴并逐步实现刑事诉讼权利的宪法化。     

构建我国公诉变更制度的几点思考

公诉变更是控审分离的刑事诉讼结构下检察机关公诉权的重要内容之一,我国法律未明确规定公诉变更制度,实践中检察机关长期以来一直依据相关的司法解释行使公诉变更权。司法解释存在着过于简单的缺陷,使得实践中公诉变更缺乏严格的操作规范,应尽快以立法的形式确立我国的公诉变更制度。     

系列炸弹恐吓案件定性分析

近几个月来,北京市连续发生了数起系列炸弹恐吓案件。在这些案件中,由于犯罪嫌疑人的动机不同,作案方式各有差别,因此,不能笼统地予以认定。只有区分不同情况进行详细分析,准确定性,才能保证实践中对此类新型犯罪进行有力的打击。     

中国大陆、香港、澳门公诉裁量制度比较研究

公诉裁量在刑事诉讼流程中处于至关重要的地位,它直接决定了刑事案件能否进入审判程序,因而对犯罪控制和人权保障具有重大意义.在我国当前一国两制三法域的司法框架下,三地区公诉裁量权在内涵、主体、原则、范围和制约机制等方面的较大差异必定导致三地互涉案件在起诉裁量进而在裁判结果上甚为悬殊,这对犯罪嫌疑人个人不公平,对三地的司法协作也存在消极影响.因此,应借鉴香港和澳门的经验,从适用范围、裁量类型等方面调整和完善大陆地区的公诉裁量制度,实现公诉的节制.     

我国刑事起诉程序的不足与完善

我国刑事立法中自诉案件存在的不足主要表现为自诉案件范围过于宽泛,自诉与公诉转换条件模糊,因而自诉程序的价值难以发挥。应当限制自诉案件的范围,对由公安机关立案侦查的自诉案件,被害人有是否提起公诉的决定权。     

侵占罪之亲告罪定位反思

’97刑法规定了侵占罪,填补了一项法律空白,使制裁非法占有他人遗忘物、委托保管物等的行为变得有法可依,对更好地维护人们的财产权益大有裨益。但由于立法者将该罪限定为“告诉才处理”,使得司法实践中对侵占行为的打击严重不力,被害人的权益难以通过法律途径得到有效保障。这里将通过具体案例引发对侵占罪之亲告罪定位的否定性论证,并就如何对该罪进行立法完善和修改进行思考。