《狐火》少女帮中的“长腿”形象刍论

美国当代作家欧茨在小说《狐火》中，塑造了一个以“越轨”的极端方式对抗社会弊痼的少女帮头领形象——“长腿”。尽管同马克·吐温笔下的少男哈克一样叛逆不羁，但长腿的越轨有着十分复杂的社会和心理原因，不能简单地等同于违法乱纪。欧茨以一种既谴责又同情、既赞扬又惋惜的矛盾心理，展开了一场细致入微的少女心灵剖析和鞭辟入里的社会学盘点。并在作品的结尾采取了一个不写明主人公命运结局的模糊美学模式，从而把对“长腿”的认知权杖交给了读者。     

侦捕诉一体化工作机制的运作原理及实践完善——兼论捕权上提的影响及应对

检察机关在实践中推行的侦捕诉一体化工作机制,是刑事诉讼“互相配合”原则的具体体现.捕权上提改革开展后,给该机制的运作带来诸如办案时间紧张、不捕率上升等问题.检察机关应积极应对捕权上提,整合控诉犯罪资源、采取措施,完善侦捕诉一体化工作机制.     

论我国刑事诉讼中被追诉人的测谎权

山木集团前总裁宋山木强奸案向我们提出了被追诉人有无权利要求测谎的问题。只要在刑事诉讼中允许使用测谎技术,无论是允许其作为证据使用还是仅仅将其作为审查判断证据的手段,被追诉人单方面向法院申请测谎,实质上均是一种试图向法院澄清事实真相的诉讼证明行为。被追诉人的测谎权是一种相对权,而非绝对权。鉴于我国目前的现实情况,测谎只能作为审查判断言词证据的方法,尚不能作为独立的证据适用,因此法院是否批准被追诉人的测谎申请,应以有测谎之必要为前提。     

再论社会危害性——对犯罪本质理论的批判

针对社会危害性概念的批判由来已久,但不管是否定社会危害性的观点还是用其他概念替代的观点,如法益概念,都未能触及问题的核心,即真正有损于犯罪认定的,并不在于这一概念自身的内容是否具有规范性,而是其背后所代表的犯罪本质观念。刑法学的研究不应纠结在何谓犯罪本质上,而应围绕着犯罪成立要件而且围绕着确认犯罪成立的最后一项要件展开。以社会危害性说为代表的犯罪本质论,实质是将追问犯罪的本质作为刑事诉讼的唯一目标,且这一目标的实现仅依赖于对社会危害性的笼统证明,这损害了犯罪认定的逻辑性和科学性。因此,只有取消社会危害性所代表的犯罪本质观念,才能在犯罪认定标准中确立真正的阶层性犯罪论体系。     

论刑事发回重审制度——评刑事诉讼法修正案草案第八十三条

刑事诉讼法修正案草案对二审中的发回重审仅仅提到了一点，即限制因事实不清证据不足而发回重审的次数。这种蜻蜓点水式的修改依然不能令人满意，而且存在着理解上的歧义。对比草案前后关于发回重审的不同规定，并结合草案和现行刑诉法中发回重审的规定。分析发回重审存在的矛盾，最后借刑诉法修改之际提出了关于二审中发回重审的修改意见。     

在生态文明建设中推进欠发达地区经济转型——以淳安县的实践为例

淳安县作为浙江省的一个欠发达县,在生态文明建设方面进行了大胆的探索和尝试,走出了一条欠发达地区经济发展转型之路,同时对欠发达地区如何把生态文明建设作为平台和突破口从而实现经济发展转型产生了一些启示：要树立生态发展理念,引领经济发展转型方向;要推进＂三个创新＂,搭建经济发展转型平台;要促进＂三个协调＂,提供经济发展转型动力;要强化＂三个联动＂,形成经济发展转型合力。     

对加强胜利油田惩防体系建设的思考

建立健全惩治和预防腐败体系是推进党风廉政建设的创新举措。胜利油田惩防体系建设以党的十八精神为指针，固本清源抓教育，规范权力抓监督，以查促防抓惩处，牢牢把握促进党员干部清正廉洁、保障履职安全的目标指向，为提升胜利油田党风建设和反腐倡廉工作水平，推动胜利油田打造世界一流、实现率先发展提供政治保障。     

Lost in Santa Martha. Limitaciones para una etnografía en una cárcel de mujeres

En este artículo propongo un examen de algunos de los obstáculos establecidos por las autoridades penitenciarias para llevar a cabo un proyecto etnográfico en una cárcel de mujeres de la Ciudad de México. Mi intención es plantear la importancia de formas de investigación-acción en contextos que, como el mexicano, se ven afectados por una profunda crisis de los aparatos del Estado –en particular presto atención a los sistemas educativo, penal y de justicia- que impacta con mayor severidad a grupos vulnerables como es el caso de las mujeres en reclusión que están en el centro de este estudio de caso.     

Writing,Space and Authority: Producing and Critiquing Settler Jurisdiction in Western Australia

On the edge of Stirling Gardens in central Perth, Western Australia, five large, old-fashioned pen nibs stand in a curved line, their tips in the ground. Anne Neil’s sculpture, Memory Markers, commemorates the history of this site, which includes the Supreme Court. Taking this sculpture as an emblem of writing, which in the context of its setting highlights the relationship between literature and law, this article explores the image of the pen in the ground. As a symbol of literacy, it evokes the powerful network of discourses—particularly law, science and religion—that underwrote the imperial project. It signals, in Michele Grossman’s terms, “the event of literacy [that] radically interrupts and disrupts—but never eliminates—pre-existing Aboriginal epistemologies”. The article goes on to explore the sculpture as a symbol of the assertion of jurisdiction, the speaking of law in and over colonised space. It analyses a group of written texts associated with this site, from colonial legal assertions of jurisdiction over Aboriginal people in Edward Landor’s The Bushman (1847), through a proclamation under the Aborigines Act 1905 (WA), to Stephen Kinnane’s Indigenous family memoir of life under that act, Shadow Lines (2004).     

The problem of tatemashi in Murakami Haruki’s work: comparing The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle and 1Q84

Abstract

This article investigates a problem that has been underexamined in Murakami scholarship so far, namely what I will call tatemashi (stacking), a method of novel-writing which Murakami Haruki used twice in his career, first in Nejimakidori Kuronikuru and later in 1Q84. In both cases, Murakami first published a shorter, two-volume version, but later stacked up the novel with a third volume. This article studies the various problems surrounding this writing method. I suggest that edits during the translation process of the two novels into English have made it impossible to detect why tatemashi was carried out. By studying the Japanese versions, I identify that a main reason for tatemashi to happen is the thrust of a storyline that calls for the development of a ‘smaller-scale’ story of personal self-discovery into a ‘larger-scale’ tale of commitment to an ‘other’.