政治合法性视角下的中国贫富差距问题研究

政治合法性是政治学中的一个核心概念，它涉及民众对政治统治合法性的认可及自愿服从程度，对于建设和谐社会、维护社会稳定具有重要意义。贫富差距的扩大已成为影响社会和谐进步的障碍。将二者结合起来研究具有时代价值和意义。     

Rationality,Normativity and Practices: Towards a More Inclusive Concept of Reason

Gonzalez Arnal attempts to make apparent certain relationships that exist between knowledge and rationality that, in her opinion, further the traditional relation of exclusion between women and reason. She argues that by challenging these relationships we can obtain a better understanding of what reason actually is, and this will allow us to develop a concept of rationality that does not exclude women and other communities.     

为最高人民法院司法解释权一辩

尽管最高人民法院的司法解释工作尚存在各种不足,然而我们更应该看到其对于我国法制建设与司法实践的积极意义。最高人民法院司法解释权的正当性可以从实在法和学理两个方面得到辩护。要推进我国的司法解释制度,就要在肯定最高人民法院司法解释权之正当性的基础上,对该制度的另一些重要问题展开进一步研究。     

论环境法的正当性的依据

判断和论证环境法的正当性有五项依据。科学依据是判断环境法正当性的＂钢规铁律＂,具有正当性的环境法律应该遵循自然生态规律;信仰和伦理道德是为法律提供正当性的基本方式,衡量法律是否正当的最终标准是正义,而正义基本上是一个信仰、伦理道德问题;利益是衡量法律正当性的常衡器,将利益作为判断法律正当性的依据,是指该立法是否增加了正当的、积极的利益,是否限制了不正当的、消极的利益,对增加的和限制的利益的分配是否公平;将合法律性作为论证环境资源法正当性的一个依据,主要指其符合宪法、法统和环境基本法律;衡量制定的法律是否正当、有效,主要取决于该立法过程是否切实遵循了正当程序,判断立法程序正当性的实际标准,是看是否重视立法的民主程序和公众参与。     

以权力与权利的双重制约增强我党的政治合法性

政治合法性实质上体现了政治权力与权利的关系。当前中共政治合法性面临着严峻的挑战。增强中共政治合法性，应重在实现权力制约权力与权利制约权力的双重制约。     

生态治理中央地府际间的协调结构分析

生态治理中中央政府与地方政府不同形式和程度的矛盾和冲突的存在,决定了必须选择和设计一种良性的协调结构来有效解决之.生态治理中央地府际间的协调结构具有转型国家的特殊性和复杂性.“有限分权”的正式协调结构和“关系主导”的非正式协调结构时而相互对立、相互替代,时而相互依存、相互补充,两者还可以相互转化.因此,在选择和设计协调...     

Public–Private Partnerships in Urban Regeneration: Democratic Legitimacy and its Relation with Performance and Trust

Public-private entities set up specifically to manage and implement urban regeneration projects have been observed across several nations. In these urban regeneration partnerships, public and private partners often work together to improve languishing neighbourhoods. One of the core ideas driving the establishment of these partnerships is that, in order to more effectively tackle the challenging regeneration process, these organisations should function at arm's length from the political institutions that oversee them.

A specific question concerning these partnerships is how representative mechanisms work and how the partnership process is linked to traditional representative bodies or in other ways is connected to principles of democratic legitimacy. This paper explores the so-called democratic legitimacy of urban regeneration companies, as a form of public–private partnership, in more detail. It makes a distinction between three types of democratic legitimacy: accountability, voice, and due deliberation. Using material from a survey among managers of urban regeneration companies (URCs) in The Netherlands, this paper examines the impact of these three forms of democratic legitimacy on outcomes and trust of these URCs.

The results show a fairly strong correlation between some criteria of democratic legitimacy, especially due deliberation on the one hand and performance and trust on the other hand.     

论我国行政服务中心的制度困境及其破解

行政服务中心是新公共管理理论在我国的实践模式。它体现了生产者社会向顾客社会的角色转换;承载了由行政审批到市民服务的核心功能。制度困境是行政服务中心的根本制约因素,包括合法性与合理性的纠结,机构性质不明确和机构职能模糊。进行制度创新是根本出路：通过行政服务中心的组织法和程序法确立中心的合法地位;确定行政服务中心性质为常设性行政机构;合理设定中心的职能边界。     

民事上诉审查制度研究

我国民事诉讼立法对于提起上诉的条件仅规定了形式要件,缺乏实质要件的内容,这与理论上对上诉权的不适当定位关系密切。上诉权作为一项程序性权利,必然受到程序进行规律的制约,而不应当视为一项当然性权利。在此前提下,借鉴国外的上诉审查理念和制度,结合我国实际情况构建我国的上诉审查制度。     

The myth of success: the emergence and maintenance of a specialized gang unit in Stockholm,Sweden

Street gangs and organized crime groups pose a unique challenge to police departments across the globe. Given their penchant for public displays of affiliation through well-recognized signs and symbols, their presence is often associated with media attention and public scrutiny, which threatens the legitimacy of the police and creates added pressure to generate a specific and public response to the threat these groups pose. The current study documents how the Stockholm County, Sweden, police developed and maintained an anti-gang operation in response to an emerging gang problem. While police officials labeled the anti-gang initiative a success in the news media, analyses of prosecution statistics and internal police documents demonstrate a less than ideal effect of this operation. Potential reasons for the discrepancy in public pronouncements of programmatic success relative to evaluation of official data are discussed.