论公众人物及其隐私权

公众人物是指在一定时间和空间范围内具有重要影响，并且与社会公众利益有关从而为该时空范围内的人们所广泛知晓和关注的人物。其判断标准有两个：一是社会知名度，二是与社会公共利益相关。由隐私权的基本权利性质决定，公众人物作为社会大众中的一员享有隐私权是无可争议的，公众人物的隐私权理应受到相应的法律保护。并且，基于公众人物隐私权不同于普通公民隐私权的特性，应当加大对公众人物的隐私权的保护力度。     

试论我国隐私权的法律保护——以美国隐私权保护为参照

我国隐私权在民法中不是一项独立的人格权,只是寄生于名誉权之下,我国隐私权在诉讼法中也不是一项独立的诉因,在宪法中更没有上升为一项基本人权。在比较中借鉴美国隐私权保护的一些经验会对我国隐私权保护的完善有益。     

网络环境中版权和隐私权的冲突与协调

随着版权保护技术措施的实施,尤其通过电子版权管理系统,版权人可以控制个人使用作品的行为,版权人侵入到个人隐私领域成为可能,使版权与隐私权产生冲突。解决冲突的协调方式是在立法上保证版权人和隐私权人的利益的平衡。     

Pondering personal privacy: a pragmatic approach to the Fourth Amendment protection of privacy in the information age

As technology with surveillance capacities has advanced, the debate over the rights of the citizenry to be free from governmental breaches of personal privacy has intensified. Within the United States, government actions legally challenged as intrusions into personal privacy have been analyzed under the Fourth Amendment, but Supreme Court rulings in such cases lack a clear and consistent rationale. Additionally, while more than a dozen federal privacy statutes have been enacted, each piece of legislation pertains to a specific type of information (e.g. driver’s license information, education records, and financial records). There is no overarching federal legislation which protects the individual’s private affairs from warrantless government inspection. A key issue underlying the scope of the debate and the variation in court decisions and public policies pertinent to invasions of privacy by government agencies is the lack of a clear and cogent definition of ‘privacy.’ By means of a review of the evolution of legal protections of privacy under the Fourth Amendment and a review of the evolution of technology with surveillance applications, it is suggested that there is a need for a sound operational definition of privacy. As a starting point for an informed and pragmatic dialogue on this matter, an operational definition of privacy built upon extant case and statutory law is provided.     

浅析医学临床教学中患者隐私权的法律保护

在医学临床教学中,经常会出现侵犯患者隐私权的情形。我国法律中没有关于侵犯患者隐私权的责任承担等明确的规定,导致现实中一些侵犯患者隐私权的案件在司法实践中屡遇难题。本文结合医学生临床实习的情况,分析临床教学中侵犯患者隐私权的行为,并在现有法律框架内如何解决医学生临床实习与患者隐私权之间的矛盾提出建议。     

Property rights in personal data: Learning from the American discourse

This contribution is an attempt to facilitate a meaningful European discussion on propertization of personal data by explaining the idea as it emerged in its ‘mother-jurisdiction’, the United States. The piece starts with an overview of how the current US legal system addresses the data protection problem and whether, according to the US commentators, the law does it effectively. Furthermore, the contribution presents propertization of personal information as an alternative to the existing data protection regime and one of the ways to fill in the alleged gaps in the US data protection system. The article maps the US propertization debate. Pro-propertization arguments are considered from economic perspective as well as from the perspective of the limitations of the US legal and political system. In continuation it analyses proposals on how property rights in personal data would have to be regulated, if at all, in case the idea of propertization is accepted. The main points of criticism of propertization are also sketched. The article concludes with a brief summary of the US propertization discourse and, most importantly, with a list of the lessons Europeans can learn from their American counterparts engaging in the debate in the home jurisdiction. Among the main messages is that the outcome of the debate depends on the definition of the problem propertization is called on to tackle, and that it is the substance of the actual rights with regard to personal data that matters, and not whether we label them as property rights or not.     

“性贿赂”立法不宜冒进——基于现实困境进路的考察

"性贿赂"立法问题既包含有法理层面的疑问,也包含有现实层面的疑问。"性贿赂"基于其与财产贿赂的同质性,应当有立法对其进行规制是必要的,但基于其在现实层面上的操作难度及可行性,又给予其入罪以否定的回答。     

论隐私的法律保护范围

隐私权是自然人人格权的重要内容 ,但并不是所有的隐私都应得到法律的保护 ,法律保护的隐私的范围应严格限定为具有合法性的个人隐私。由于我国现行立法没有对隐私做出具体的规定 ,一方面使得公民的隐私权难以得到充分的法律保护 ;另一方面又有试图将隐私范围扩大化的倾向 ,并使隐私权超出合理的范围而与其他权利相冲突。     

网络时代隐私权的法律保护

随着大众传媒的不断发展,侵害公民个人隐私的行为也不断发生,保护公民隐私权已成为我国法学界的共识。我国对公民隐私权的保护还需要在立法上加以完善,同时对隐私权的保护也需要进行一定的限制。     

隐私关注对移动个性化服务采纳的影响——基于用户主观认知视角的实证研究

文章研究隐私关注与MPS采纳行为意愿之间的影响关系,创新性提出从用户主观认知视角的MPS采纳理论模型。通过调研收集421份问卷,并采用结构方程模型进行隐私关注程度测量与用户隐私认知之间关系分析,验证各影响因素与隐私关注,以及隐私关注与采纳MPS意愿之间的理论假设。结果表明,用户隐私倾向、内控点、社交群体对隐私关注信息收集、错误使用、不正当访问、二次使用都有显著的正向影响;用户开放性、随和性和外向性对隐私关注上述四个维度都有显著的负向影响;同时,提出的影响因素通过隐私关注四个维度均负向影响用户采纳MPS的意愿。文章能为企业革新隐私关注下的网络营销方式,以及促进用户采纳MPS意愿向实际行为转换提供理论支持。