排序方式： 共有83条查询结果，搜索用时 0 毫秒
51.
52.
张迎秀 《山东行政学院学报》2007,(4):55-57
补办登记的婚姻效力自男女双方均符合结婚的实质要件时起算,"应当补办登记"存在着以下弊端影响了法律的权威性和严肃性;影响了结婚登记制度的贯彻执行;容易造成早婚早育.因此,对未办理结婚登记的应采取以下法律对策加强法制宣传、完善结婚登记制度、强化法律制裁手段. 相似文献
53.
杨肖 《胜利油田党校学报》2012,25(2):8-12
新中国成立后,朱德担任了新成立的中央纪委书记。在主持工作期间,他围绕党的纪检工作作了全面、深入的理论探索和思考,作出了重要贡献。他阐述了党执政后加强纪律的重要性,提出纪检工作要围绕党的路线、方针、政策进行;总结了违反党纪行为的突出表现形式并分析了原因;提出了加强教育、严格纪律、重视监督等防止党员干部违反党纪的重要方法;提出了加强领导、健全组织、人员培养、制度建设等加强纪检机关建设的重要建议。 相似文献
54.
德江县6·25事件发生后,各级领导和相关部门处置事件的每个环节都体现了以人为本、为民尽责的执政理念;阳光公开的法制精神;务实精细的工作作风。正是这种高度负责的精神和真诚关怀赢得群众的理解,促进了稳定、改革、发展的相互协调,得到了中央、省领导的高度评价。面对新形势、新任务,借鉴、借助、借用铜仁德江经验,对推动全区科学和谐发展具有一定现实意义。 相似文献
55.
This paper describes how supervised visitation programs in Florida rapidly transitioned from in‐person supervised visits to virtual, online visits during the COVID‐19 pandemic to protect the health of families and staff. Structured telephonic interviews and an online survey revealed that although most program directors had not previously developed guiding policies or hosted such visits, within weeks they were providing hundreds of online “virtual visits” between children and their non‐custodial parents to maintain the crucial parent–child relationship in a safe manner. Vignettes from this data provide lessons regarding parent and child reactions to virtual visits, advantages and disadvantages of virtual visits from the programs' perspectives, and levels of enthusiasm for using virtual visits going forward. In addition, the data includes recommendations for new program guidelines and protocols for the ongoing use of virtual visits. Although it is too early to call these policies best practices, the study does offer insight into the challenges and opportunities afforded by virtual visits and can inform disaster planning that supervised visitation programs develop to prepare for inevitable future disruptions in services to families. 相似文献
56.
Judge Alexandra Harland 《Family Court Review》2021,59(1):121-130
In this article I will focus on two important aspects of children's rights which are impacted by artificial reproductive technology (particularly surrogacy); being the rights to identity and the rights to legal parentage. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child acknowledges the importance of a child's right to identity, to be protected from discrimination on the basis of the status or beliefs of the child's parents, legal guardians or family members. For many children born through surrogacy arrangements, they may have only one or no legally recognized parent. The adults caring for them may have parental responsibility orders but this falls well short of providing children with the benefits and protections that legal parentage does. The issue of identity can be complex. Increasingly, states have recognized the importance of children knowing the circumstances of their birth and being able to access biological and genetic information including medical information. From a child's perspective the issues of identity and parenthood are intertwined. Given the importance of identity, more needs to be done to ensure that identifying information about children born as a result of artificial reproductive technology is properly stored and readily accessible for these children. Denying a child legal parentage when there are no concerns about the care being provided by their parents cannot be justified when considered from a children's rights perspective. 相似文献
57.
A subgroup of intractable families, in which a child refuses postseparation contact with a parent, perplexes and frustrates professionals who work with them. This article discusses the underlying forces that drive the family's intractability, as well as guidelines for working with the family. The guidelines include specific court orders developed from the very beginning of the case that elaborate the court's stance about goals and expectations for the family, along with specialized individual and family therapies that are undertaken within a framework of planned collaboration with the court. The collaborative team of legal and mental health professionals works in an innovative and active way to structure, support, and monitor the family's progress in resolving the resist/refuse dynamic. 相似文献
58.
Shelley Kierstead 《Family Court Review》2011,49(1):140-154
This work considers how court‐connected parent education programs can assist parents to access dispute resolution processes that best suit their families’ needs, in a manner involving appropriately curtailed levels of state interference with parental autonomy. After reviewing traditionally accepted limits on state interference with family functioning, the increased concern for children's emotional well‐being, and data relating to one parent education program, the author concludes that providing mandatory “basic level” informational programs to all separating parents seeking access to the family law regime is a warranted level of state intervention. “Skills‐building” programs aimed at achieving demonstrably changed parental practices should be available on a voluntary attendance basis. 相似文献
59.
Brittany N. Rudd Amy Hotzworth‐Munroe Amy G. Applegate Brian M. D'Onofrio Robin H. Ballard John E. Bates 《Family Court Review》2015,53(4):602-616
We examined the association between parents’ (N = 52 mothers and 52 fathers) and children's (N = 27) reports of interparental conflict and child difficulties in a family mediation setting. Parents’ reports of conflict were moderately associated with children's reports of exposure to parental conflict, but only fathers’ reports of conflict were associated with children's reports of negative responses to parent conflict. While mothers and fathers agreed on their child's difficulties, only mothers’, not fathers’, report of child difficulties were moderately related to child reports of child difficulties. Mothers’ and fathers’ reports of conflict generally were not strongly associated with reports of child difficulties. In contrast to parent reports, children's reports of exposure to parents’ conflict were moderately and significantly related to self‐reported child difficulties and moderately related to parents’ reports of child academic difficulties. The magnitude of the association between the child's report of interparental conflict and self‐report of difficulties was stronger than the association between parent report of conflict and parent report of child difficulties, suggesting that parents may not fully understand their child's exposure to parent conflict/violence or the problems their child is experiencing.
- Key Points for the Family Court Community:
- Family law stakeholders prioritize the creation of parenting arrangements that are in the best interest of the child; however, it is unclear how to gather information about the child and the child's perspective in order to inform such arrangements.
- The study results suggest that parents may not agree with each other or with the child about important family issues, such as parent conflict and child difficulties. For example, parents may not fully understand their child's exposure to parental conflict/violence when in the midst of custody negotiations.
- More research is needed to determine the best method for gathering information about the child during custody proceedings. In the meantime, it is important to gather information from multiple sources and to consider the agreement and differences across such sources of information.
60.
Alex R. Piquero David P. Farrington Brandon C. Welsh Richard Tremblay Wesley G. Jennings 《Journal of Experimental Criminology》2009,5(2):83-120
Based on evidence that early antisocial behavior is a key risk factor for delinquency and crime throughout the life course,
early family/parent training, among its many functions, has been advanced as an important intervention/prevention effort.
There are several theories concerning why early family/parent training may cause a reduction in child behavior problems including
antisocial behavior and delinquency (and have other ancillary benefits in non-crime domains over the life course). The prevention
of behavior problems is one of the many objectives of early family/parent training, and it comprises the main focus of this
review. Results indicate that early family/parent training is an effective intervention for reducing behavior problems among
young children, and the weighted effect size was 0.35. The results from a series of analog to the analysis of variance (ANOVA)
and weighted least squares regression models (with random effects) demonstrated that there were significant differences in
the effect sizes of studies conducted in the USA versus those conducted in other countries and that studies that were based
on samples smaller than 100 children had larger effect sizes. Sample size was also the strongest predictor of the variation
in the effect sizes. Additional evidence indicated that early family/parent training was also effective in reducing delinquency
and crime in later adolescence and adulthood. Overall, the findings lend support for the continued use of early family/parent
training to prevent behavior problems. Future research should test the main theories of early family/parent training and detail
more explicitly the causal mechanisms by which early family/parent training reduces delinquency and crime, and future evaluations
should employ high quality designs with long-term follow-ups, including repeated measures of antisocial behavior, delinquency,
and crime over the life course.
Alex R. Piquero is Professor of Criminology & Criminal Justice at the University of Maryland College Park, USA, Co-Editor of the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, and Executive Counselor with the American Society of Criminology. His research interests include criminal careers, criminological theory, and quantitative research methods. He is the recipient of several teaching, research, and mentoring awards. David P. Farrington is Professor of Psychological Criminology at Cambridge University, UK. His major research interests are in developmental criminology and delinquency prevention, and he has completed a number of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of criminological interventions. Brandon C. Welsh, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor in the College of Criminal Justice at Northeastern University, USA. He is an author or editor of seven books, including Saving Children from a Life of Crime: Early Risk Factors and Effective Interventions (Oxford University Press, 2007) and Preventing Crime: What Works for Children, Offenders, Victims, and Places (Springer, 2006). Richard E. Tremblay is Canada Research Chair in Child Development, Professor of Pediatrics/Psychiatry/Psychology, and Director of the Research Unit on Children’s Psychosocial Maladjustment at the University of Montreal, Canada. Since the early 1980s he has been conducting a program of longitudinal and experimental studies, focusing on the physical, cognitive, emotional, and social development of children from conception onward, in order to gain a better understanding of the development and prevention of antisocial and violent behavior. Director of the Centre of Excellence for Early Child Development, he is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada and the Molson Fellow of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research. Wesley G. Jennings, Ph.D is an assistant professor in the Department of Justice Administration at the University of Louisville, USA, and holds a Ph.D. in criminology from the University of Florida. His recent interests are primarily in the application of semi-parametric group-based modeling techniques to study behavioral trajectories over time. Some of his recent publications have appeared in Justice Quarterly, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Journal of Criminal Justice, Criminology and Public Policy, Deviant Behavior, and the Journal of Drug Issues. 相似文献
| Alex R. PiqueroEmail: |
Alex R. Piquero is Professor of Criminology & Criminal Justice at the University of Maryland College Park, USA, Co-Editor of the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, and Executive Counselor with the American Society of Criminology. His research interests include criminal careers, criminological theory, and quantitative research methods. He is the recipient of several teaching, research, and mentoring awards. David P. Farrington is Professor of Psychological Criminology at Cambridge University, UK. His major research interests are in developmental criminology and delinquency prevention, and he has completed a number of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of criminological interventions. Brandon C. Welsh, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor in the College of Criminal Justice at Northeastern University, USA. He is an author or editor of seven books, including Saving Children from a Life of Crime: Early Risk Factors and Effective Interventions (Oxford University Press, 2007) and Preventing Crime: What Works for Children, Offenders, Victims, and Places (Springer, 2006). Richard E. Tremblay is Canada Research Chair in Child Development, Professor of Pediatrics/Psychiatry/Psychology, and Director of the Research Unit on Children’s Psychosocial Maladjustment at the University of Montreal, Canada. Since the early 1980s he has been conducting a program of longitudinal and experimental studies, focusing on the physical, cognitive, emotional, and social development of children from conception onward, in order to gain a better understanding of the development and prevention of antisocial and violent behavior. Director of the Centre of Excellence for Early Child Development, he is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada and the Molson Fellow of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research. Wesley G. Jennings, Ph.D is an assistant professor in the Department of Justice Administration at the University of Louisville, USA, and holds a Ph.D. in criminology from the University of Florida. His recent interests are primarily in the application of semi-parametric group-based modeling techniques to study behavioral trajectories over time. Some of his recent publications have appeared in Justice Quarterly, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Journal of Criminal Justice, Criminology and Public Policy, Deviant Behavior, and the Journal of Drug Issues. 相似文献