This paper reports a study examining associations between objective indicators of the level of discipline within schools and
students’ perceptions of the strictness of discipline. Data were analyzed from the National Education Longitudinal Survey
(NELS), a nationally representative panel study of eighth grade students attending public and private schools in 1988. We
find evidence for an association between objective and perceived risk of discipline in models that examine the covariation
of these two constructs at several cross sections, and in models of change in perceptions as a function of change in school
sanctioning climate. Moreover, these associations were strongest in small and less disordered schools.
This article explores the paradox in the reaction of the United States to the two different proliferation cases: Pakistan's proliferation and Iran's weaponization effort. The article tries to find answer to the following key question; why the United States, as one of the guardians of the Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) which would prefer to see a region that is entirely free of weapons of mass destruction, ultimately has accepted Pakistan's proliferation, while imposed considerable amount of pressure to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
The paper posits that number of factors explain such differences; first, and at the theoretical level, Pakistan was never considered an “irrational” and “messianic” state like Iran, but regarded as a country with a certain degree of cold-war type nuclear rationality. Second and at the applied level, while Pakistan was a US ally with not having a history of challenging the United States, Iran has been considered enemy and a threat toward the US interest.
Third, while Pakistan's nuclear arsenal was viewed as a defensive mean against overwhelming strength of India, Iran's possible nuclear arsenal considered to be for offensive uses against the United States and Israel. The fourth factor pertains to the consequences of proliferation, which is what happens when Iran's neighboring countries may feel threatened by Iranian nuclear weapon and proceed to develop their own arsenal. Fifth factor deals with the possible Iran's temptation to give some nuclear material to a terror group in which made the United States serious in preventing Iran's weaponization. Last but not least, Israel was not involved to pressure and agitate against Pakistan, while it was applied a tremendous pressure against Iran to prevent it from achieving nuclear weapons. 相似文献
Since Roe v. Wade, most states have passed laws either restricting or further protecting reproductive rights. During a wave of anti-abortion
violence in the early 1990s, several states also enacted legislation protecting abortion clinics, staff, and patients. One
hypothesis drawn from the theoretical literature predicts that these laws provide a deterrent effect and thus fewer anti-abortion
crimes in states that protect clinics and reproductive rights. An alternative hypothesis drawn from the literature expects
a backlash effect from radical members of the movement and thus more crimes in states with protective legislation. We tested
these competing hypotheses by taking advantage of unique data sets that gauge the strength of laws protecting clinics and
reproductive rights and that provide self-report victimization data from clinics. Employing logistic regression and controlling
for several potential covariates, we found null effects and thus no support for either hypothesis. The null findings were
consistent across a number of different types of victimization. Our discussion contextualizes these results in terms of previous
research on crimes against abortion providers, discusses alternative explanations for the null findings, and considers the
implications for future policy development and research. 相似文献
This essay provides an economist’s perspective on criminological research into incapacitation effects on crime. Our central
argument is that criminologists would do well to substantially scale back the enterprise of trying to estimate the various
behavioral parameters central to a micro-level approach to measuring incapacitation effects, including the annual rate of
offending outside of prison (λ) and the lengths of criminal careers. One problem with this line of research is practical:
for example, mean estimates of self-reported criminal activity by incarcerated prisoners are quite sensitive to reports by
the most criminally active offenders. But the larger concern is conceptual—the incapacitation effects from a given change
in sentencing policy may be undermined by the possibility of replacement effects, and at the same time omit other benefits
that may arise from deterrent effects on crime. A more promising approach is to identify plausibly exogenous changes in sentencing
policy in order to estimate the net impact on crime from the combined effects of incapacitation, deterrence and replacement.