用固相萃取法提取净化生物检材中拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂的实验研究

固相萃取法（Sep－PakC18小柱）同时萃取净化生物检材（血浆、尿）中的甲醚菊酯、灭扫利、功夫、二氯苯醚菊酯、安绿宝、速灭杀丁和敌杀死。通过气相色谱氢焰检测器、非极性熔融石英大口径毛细管柱及程序升温色谱条件，得到较好的系统分离，并测定萃取回收率在81％～93％（血浆）和90％～102％之间（尿）。实验证明，用70％甲醇稀释检材并用氯仿洗脱可得到较完全的吸附和最佳回收率。     

Chelex-100法提取滤纸血痕DNA影响因素的比较

目的改进滤纸血痕DNA提取方法,建立更简便、廉价,适合当前DNA建库需要的提取方法。方法将752份滤纸血痕分成四组,分别按照四种不同的Chelex-100法进行DNA提取并进行比较研究;63份新鲜血痕分别按照两种方法提取并进行对比研究。结果对于陈旧滤纸血痕,四种提取方法的检测成功率无显著差异(P>0.05);对于新鲜血痕,两种提取方法的检测成功率有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论对于建库陈旧滤纸血痕样本的DNA提取可采用不加纯水处理,直接加入Chelex-100的方法进行。     

尿液中丁丙诺啡的提取方法

目的建立尿液中丁丙诺啡提取方法。方法尿液加pH 7.0缓冲液后,用三氯甲烷进行液相萃取或加pH 10.8缓冲液后,用401有机担体作吸附剂、三氯甲烷作洗脱剂进行固相萃取,GC/NPD法检测。结果尿液中丁丙诺啡液相萃取萃取率可达86.6%以上,固相萃取可达83.0%以上。结论两种提取方法萃取率高,可用于尿液中丁丙诺啡的提取。     

Chelex法和两种磁珠法提取接触DNA效果的比较

目的比较Chelex法、DNA IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法对接触DNA的提取效果。方法将稀释为10ng、100ng的标准品DNA,分别采用Chelex法、DNA IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法处理;对30例烟蒂和30例牙刷分别采用Chelex法、DNA IQ磁珠法和EQ国产磁珠法提取DNA,然后进行PCR定量和STR检测。结果Chelex法对DNA的提取无损失,DNA IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法对DNA的提取均有不同程度的损失;烟蒂、牙刷等检材采用Chelex法提取的接触DNA量和IPC CT值显著高于IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法,但STR检验成功率却低于IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法。2种磁珠法提取的DNA量、IPC CT值和STR检验成功率无显著性差异。结论污染轻、杂质少的接触DNA检材,用Chelex法提取最为方便快捷;IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法更适合污染接触DNA检材的提取及自动化操作。     

Dating of Inkpad Seals Using the Extraction Rate Method: Preliminary Findings

Inkpad seals are often placed on important documents, and determining the date when a seal was affixed can be important to assess the authenticity of a document. In this study, three different brands of inkpads and four different types of paper were used to make diachronic samples of the seals. A double‐solvent extraction method was employed to date the inkpad seals by comparing extraction rates with inks of known age. Cyclohexane was selected as a weak solvent, and chlorobenzene was selected as a strong solvent. After testing, curves were created to show the relationship between the extraction percentage of ink and the date of the seals. The experimental results showed that the extraction rate method was applicable for the relative dating of inkpad seals in some cases where the seal was placed on the document within 6 months.     

SPE-GC／MS检测生物样品中利多卡因、罗哌卡因、布比卡因

目的建立生物样品中利多卡因、罗哌卡因、布比卡因的固相萃取提取方法和气质检测方法。方法采用Oasis HLB固相萃取柱,以GC／MS定性定量。结果生物样品中利多卡因、罗哌卡因、布比卡因平均萃取回收率达74％以上,检测限0．01μg／mL,线性关系良好,相关系数R2=0．9900以上。结论方法操作简便快速,萃取回收率高,重现性好,可用于实际案件。     

Maxwell 16裂解纯化法提取陈旧精子DNA的应用

目的利用Maxwell 16裂解纯化法从保存8年以上陈旧精斑检材中获取精子DNA。方法 8份陈旧精斑检材采用Maxwell 16裂解纯化法提取精子DNA,并采用Powerplex○R21试剂盒进行复合扩增,产物用AB3130型遗传分析仪检测,结果与常规方法进行对比。结果成功获得8份陈旧精斑检材精子STR分型。结论差异裂解配合Maxwell 16裂解在陈旧精斑检材精子DNA检验中效果明显。     

The Successful Recovery of Low Copy Number and Degraded DNA from Bones Exposed to Seawater Suitable for Generating a DNA STR Profile

A universal method allowing for DNA profiling from bones exposed to seawater has not been reported yet. This study refers on the identification of a body immersed in seawater for 8 months. The biological material for identification was the mandibular body, usually characterized by low success rates of DNA analysis. Initially, two extraction protocols were performed with negative results: one used for bones immersed in fresh water and a silica‐column procedure. A third protocol was performed, which combined the extraction of a higher amount of bone powder, the use of multi‐silica‐based extraction columns followed by a concentration step. This protocol allowed to obtain low copy number DNA and to generate a 12‐loci STR profile by combining conventional STR typing and mini‐STR technologies. This protocol could be suitable when human bones have been exposed to severe environmental conditions, and the available nuclear DNA is highly degraded and in low copy number.     

快速溶剂萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用法分析血液中的农药

目的：建立生物检材血液中农药的快速溶剂萃取（accelerated solvent extraction,ASE）法。方法通过优化ASE萃取条件,考察萃取温度、时间和萃取剂对回收率的影响,提取血液中的农药进行气相色谱-质谱联用（GC/MS）法定性定量分析。结果血液中8种农药的平均回收率在70.6%~92.4%,变异系数小于5.0%,8种农药在0.5~5.0μg/mL的浓度范围内线性良好。结论该方法具有操作简便快捷、回收率高、重现性好等特点,可用于农药的提取检验。     

“UNUSUAL” TISSUES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION STRATEGIES ON EXHUMED BODIES

The choice of soft or hard tissues to be sampled in case of exhumation of corpses for identification purposes or family relationship testing is based on the degradation conditions of the corpse: the more the corpse is degraded, the less DNA is expected to be retrieved from soft tissue. Therefore, the choice of the "best" tissue samples usually falls on teeth and bones in these “difficult” cases, even though the DNA extraction procedure requires time and effort and it can often result in unexpected, negative results.We here present the results of a daily practice survey that shows that it is possible to obtain good results even on DNA extracted from tissues that appear to be less “appealing” to the examiner by performing “simple” corneal/scleral swabs along with cartilage.While DNA extracted from cartilage has been already described, to our knowledge there is no evidence of publications in the scientific literature dealing with cornea/sclera as a source of DNA in the forensic laboratory.The obtained results demonstrate that it may be advisable to consider other tissues which bear the potential of returning good profile results despite not appearing particularly useful and better control of contamination.