醉驾入刑语境下的程序思考

醉驾入刑以来,各地司法机关在实践中形成羁押与非羁押两类快速办理模式。羁押模式在合法性方面存在瑕疵,而非羁押模式能够经得起立法及司法的检验。总体上要求在办理醉驾案件过程中,公安机关对犯罪嫌疑人采取非羁押措施、检察机关依法快速审查起诉、法院适用简易程序审理案件。     

对交警查处“其他妨碍安全驾驶行为”的若干思考

有权威统计数据显示在江苏省＂其他妨碍安全驾驶行为＂是造成交通事故的首要原因。由于＂其他妨碍安全驾驶行为＂在法理上属于不确定性法律概念和概括性规定,理论上其法律属性不够明确,范围难以准确界定。执法实践中,其具体操作时涉及的行政裁量、程序性规制方面的问题亟待立法机关和行政部门进一步加以解释和规范。     

Segmental hair analysis in order to evaluate driving performance

On the 31st of July 2002 the Lombardy local government issued a memorandum, C.R. 35/SAN, providing "guidelines to investigate drugs of abuse addiction in order to judge driving performance". About hair samples, this memorandum advises that the proximal lock of 6 cm-length would be analysed for opiates, cocaine, cannabinoids, amphetamine and derivatives, divided into two segments of 3 cm each. The Local Medical Driving Licence Commissions (CML) can decide whether or not to enforce these instructions; from our survey it resulted that most CMLs do not abide by the memorandum, not requiring segmental analysis. The purpose of our study was to verify whether this procedural discordance could affect analytical results and, consequently, the evaluation of the subject's driving performance. We analysed hair samples taken from subjects who were requesting the renewal of their driving licence in our Laboratory during the period from 1 August 2002 to 31 December 2006. We divided samples into two groups: (1) samples previously analysed in one single segment which resulted positive for at least one analyte, but under the cut-off (0.5 ng/mg), were re-analysed in accordance with the guidelines; (2) samples previously processed following guidelines which resulted positive in one of the segments were newly analysed in a single segment. Comparing the new results with the original ones, an increase of positive results emerged in the first group. The second set of results fully supported the first ones. These results underscore the importance of the 35/SAN memorandum, so if the guidelines had been followed there would have been a larger amount of driving licence renewal denied.     

直面贫困:当前高校勤工助学工作研究

本文着重探讨当前高校勤工助学工作的意义、功能,并对当前勤工助学工作中出现的问题与难点进行剖析,进而结合工作中的实践与创新对如何加强引导和规范管理等问题展开讨论并提出对策.     

对"知假买假"者索赔问题的法律思考

、近几年，对“知假买假”索赔；有的地方法院予以支持，有的地方法院则不予支持。产生这种现象的根本原因是我国《消费权益保护法》中的有关“消费”基本法律特征的规定，使人们对“知假买假”的“消费”身份产生歧义。所以，应尽快修改《消法》，以明确“消费”的身份。“知假买假”作为“消费”应该是确定无疑的，理应受到法律的保护，而“卖假”的行为具有严重的社会危害性和违法性，理应受到法律的制度。支持“知假买假”索赔可以刺激和鼓励广大消费与不法销售作斗争，制栽和惩罚销售假冒伪劣产品的不法行为人，从而有效地遏制生产、售销假冒伪劣产品的行为，通过强化对消费的保护，维护消费权益，最终还可以起到净化市场的积极作用。     

危险驾驶罪与交通肇事罪的关系

在危险驾驶罪增设之前，交通肇事罪是典型的过失犯罪，“飙车”与“醉驾”同无照驾驶、超栽等其他违反交通运输管理法规行为一样，只是作为交通肇事罪成立的前提条件而存在，当此类行为过失造成伤亡结果时成立交通肇事罪。但危险驾驶罪的增设。使得交通肇事罪存在着单纯过失犯罪与作为危险驾驶罪之结果加重犯两种不同构造，因此，明知对方醉酒却唆使其驾驶机动车过失致人伤亡的，构成交通肇事罪（危险驾驶罪的结果加重犯）的共犯，二人均需对伤亡结果承担刑事责任。     

The methodological struggles of racial profiling research: a causal question that automobile stop data has yet to answer

Automobile stop research finds that citizen race influences officer decision-making. Researchers, however, report methodological issues inhibiting them from drawing causal inferences about the existence of racial profiling. The purpose of this study is to deconstruct this field of inquiry through a causal lens to inform the next generation of scholarship. Through an analysis of automobile stop data, temporal ordering issues are exposed. Relating to association, most studies find that racial minorities are more likely to be searched, however, spuriousness issues continue to plague racial profiling studies as researchers rarely estimate departmental, passenger, vehicle, and temporal variables. To confront these issues, researchers are encouraged to engage in primary data collection and explore recent statistical innovations in their analytical strategies.     

"趋同论"刍议

在中国共产党与民主党派的多党合作中趋同具有必然性,但这种趋同是以中国共产党与民主党派的不同为前提的,其实质是一个不断求同存异的过程。准确把握同和异的辩证关系,是正确认识趋同论的一把钥匙。     

略论新刑事诉讼法逮捕条件之把握——从一起案件的受理争议谈起简

犯罪嫌疑人是否在案以及采取强制措施的情况,是修改后的《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》第153条规定的案管部门受理案件应当审查的内容之一。对于审查起诉阶段违反取保候审规定的涉嫌危险驾驶罪的犯罪嫌疑人,再次归案后如何移送检察机关审查起诉,涉及到对该犯罪嫌疑人适用何种强制措施的问题。     

“毒驾”与道路交通安全研究

近年来,随着一些恶性交通事故的发生,酒后驾驶机动车作为道路交通安全的重大隐患,早已深入人心。而同样与＂饮酒＂被《中华人民共和国道路交通安全法》第二十二条第二款列为机动车驾驶人上路前绝对禁止的＂服用国家管制的精神药品或者麻醉药品＂的行为却未被公众引起高度的重视!面对道路交通安全领域愈演愈烈的＂毒驾＂问题,我们必须做好充分准备,未雨绸缪,对其进行全面、细致的研究,采取必要的对策予以遏制。