首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   35篇
  免费   0篇
工人农民   1篇
世界政治   1篇
外交国际关系   3篇
法律   15篇
中国共产党   1篇
中国政治   2篇
政治理论   4篇
综合类   8篇
  2021年   1篇
  2019年   3篇
  2018年   4篇
  2016年   2篇
  2015年   1篇
  2014年   7篇
  2013年   1篇
  2012年   1篇
  2011年   3篇
  2010年   1篇
  2009年   2篇
  2008年   2篇
  2006年   1篇
  2005年   1篇
  2003年   4篇
  2002年   1篇
排序方式: 共有35条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
31.
在计算机应用基础课双语教学中采用动态调节的教学方法,有助于提高学生的学习效果。结合专业特点整合教学内容,有助于提高学生对双语学习的积极性,拓宽学生获取信息资源的渠道,开阔学生的眼界和思路。  相似文献   
32.
The ongoing conflict in the war on terrorism puts two emblematic modes of violence into sharp relief: the drone, as an ostensibly rational, clinical and measured weapon of war, and suicide bombings, frequently portrayed as the horrid deeds of fanatics. In this article, I seek to challenge this juxtaposition and instead suggest that both modalities of killing are part of the same technologically-mediated ecology of violence. To do this, I examine the material-semiotic assemblage of the drone and of the suicide bomber, paying attention to the technological production of each mode of violence, as well as the narratives that render each figure intelligible in the war on terrorism. I argue that the strongly divergent narratives found in Western discourse serve as a politically expedient sense–making device, whereby suicide bombing is pathologised, thereby justifying ever more intrusive violent acts with seemingly rational technologies like the drone. Rather than “solving” the problem of terrorism, this creates counter-productive, or iatrogenic, effects, in which technological mediation escalates rather than diminishes cycles of violence. By way of response, I suggest that a better understanding of the relational nature of violence in the war on terrorism might be gained by reading the two not as antithetical figures, but instead as operating in the same technological key.  相似文献   
33.
This article builds on the recent and growing scholarship on the negative effects of the drone programme. Current literature has shown that the drone programme terrorises the civilian population that it keeps under surveillance. Furthermore, it has articulated the drone programme’s violence as biopolitical and its surveillance as a necropolitical technology of distinction. It is argued in this article that the Orientalist attitudes and logic necessary for drone targeting form the basis for the biopolitical and necropolitical component of the drone programme. This article explores the Orientalism that suffuses the US drone programme in order to juxtapose it with governmental discourses that characterise the drone programme and its surveillance as neutral and humane – demonstrating the gap between government discourses of modernity and the actual drone programme. The necropolitical logic of distinction used for targeting leads to the assimilation of those under the drone’s gaze to a population that can be put to death, leading the drone programme to operate indiscriminately. The biopolitical logic is visible in the US practices, which I argue constitutes terrorism with the corroboration of civilian testimonies.  相似文献   
34.
分子印迹技术在法庭毒物分析中的研究进展   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
分子印迹聚合物具有预识别性、高度选择性、实用性,已广泛应用在样本前处理中,可以选择性的识别复杂基质中低浓度目标物,提高检测灵敏度。本文旨在综述和探讨分子印迹技术的原理和在法庭科学领域毒物分析应用中的研究进展。  相似文献   
35.
"致人而不致于人"是<孙子兵法>十三篇贯穿始终的谋略思想."致人"就是支配、调动、制约敌方,即紧握主动权"不致于人"即不被敌人所调动,所控制.将此思想运用于警察格斗中,能够更好地打击制服罪犯和控制犯罪,减少或避免民警在执法战斗中的伤亡.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号