浅谈绿色住宅

绿色浪潮全球性的席卷与人们返朴归真、接近自然的强烈渴求催生了一个新的市场--绿色产品市场.与人们生活息息相关的住宅产品在浓厚的绿色商业氛围中不可避免的沾染了绿的气息.绿色住宅,这一二十一世纪新型的住宅形态,不仅迎合了人们亲近自然的心理诉求,更反映了住宅建筑理念和居住文化的升迁.     

浅论武装押运风险的防控

武装押运具有较强的威慑作用，但是也存在枪支被抢、枪支被盗、枪支被滥用与防卫过当等风险。押运公司应当借鉴发达国家押运公司的成功经验，通过增强运钞车的防护能力、完善工作流程、加强风险管理与押运人员的专业培训等途径来减少武装押运的风险。     

新农村治安纵横之二 农村社会治安生态系统

农村治安生态系统指由具有相互促进和制约等有机联系的社会因素构成的,能使农村治安秩序保持某种运行状态的社会系统。实行联产承包制后,农村实有人口发案率增速高于城市人口,主要是社会变迁使农村组织化程度极低,观念体系和实际制度二元并立,以至农村社会治安生态系统缺乏具有统摄力的要素,且各要素之间的良性互动减少,破坏性因素难以被抑制,系统的运行态势不稳,自我修复能力下降,容易出现恶性循环。但由于短期内不会出现有力的组织要素,所以,经济、可行、符合法制社会要求的选择是强化公安政法机关的作用,通过严格执法、规范办案的示范作用,提升现代观念和法律制度在农村的地位。     

风险领域理论与侵权法二元归责体系

近代民法上的过错责任原则包含“有过错就有责任”和“没有过错就没有责任”两个层面。近代以来，“没有过错就没有责任”原则逐渐被废弃，代之而起的是风险责任原则。风险责任以风险领域理论为基础，根据一定的标准判断风险发生于何人领域之内，进而确定无过错所致损害的分配。划定风险领域的考量因素包括利益获取、风险开启与维持、信赖保护、损害分散可能性、自我保护可能性等。现代侵权法归责二元体系由过错归责和风险归责构成，风险责任可涵盖现行的危险责任、交往安全义务中的无过错责任、公平责任等所有无过错致害责任。风险责任立法可采一般条款加类型立法的模式。     

我国法律职业化建设的理性思考

加强法律职业化建设 ,提高法律职业队伍的素质是推进依法治国 ,建设社会主义法治国家的重要途径 ,是我国司法体制改革的重要任务。依据法律职业化的形成、概念及特征 ,对我国法律职业化的几个障碍性因素进行剖析 ,我国应加强法律职业化建设。     

警察职业人格特征的验证性因素分析

以心理测量的方法,探讨与工作特性相匹配的人格特征,是研究警察职业人格特征的一种有益尝试。通过自编警察职业人格特征测验,以不同经历的警察为被试,然后对测验结果进行验证性因素分析,得到了警察职业人格特征结构的二阶五维度模型。警察职业人格特征可以从五个维度描述,即责任感、独立敢为、人际开放、理智性和机警性。     

论环境责任保险制度——兼论环境损害赔偿的社会化机制

环境责任保险制度是一种最早适用西方国家的特殊保险制度。它可以分散风险,使企业避免因污染损害事故而遭受重大损失;有助于环境污染受害人获得及时和充分的赔偿;同时也可以通过保险公司对企业的排污行为进行监督管理。文章总结了西方国家实行的环境责任保险模式,分析了该制度面临的主要问题,并指出环境责任保险制度和环境损害赔偿法以及环境损害救济基金共同构成了环境损害赔偿社会化机制的完整体系。     

浅析人员反应对火灾风险评估的影响

通过探讨人员反应可能对火灾发生造成的影响及分析安全人员采取行动的起始时间分布,给出一种考虑人员反应的风险评估方法的基本框架并分析其优劣,表明了定量考虑人员反应的可能性。对于进一步发展风险评估方法具有借鉴意义。     

Government with a Cast of Dozens: Policy Capacity Risks and Policy Work in the Northern Territory

There are a number challenges to maintaining high‐quality policy capacity in sparsely populated areas such as Australia's Northern Territory (e.g. natural resource dependent economy, prominence of Indigenous issues, provision of local services). Moreover, the Territory government has recently been undergoing a host of public sector changes. This paper utilises survey methodologies of policy workers that were recently developed in Canada and examines nine risk factors to policy work. A survey of 119 policy workers in the Northern Territory was conducted in 2013. The analysis examined four key policy‐work areas (policy activities, barriers, areas for improved policy capacity, nature of change in work environment). The survey findings offer some practical insights for managers. Formal policy‐work training is recognised as critical. Policy capacity may be increased through better inter‐departmental (and potentially inter‐governmental) cooperation and information sharing, more opportunities to engage with non‐governmental stakeholders, and more opportunities for those leaving the full‐time Northern Territory policy workforce to continue to contribute. From a conceptual point of view, the extent to which ‘policy capacity’ as commonly conceived in the literature is applicable to contexts, such as Australia's Northern Territory, warrants further examination.     

Risk Analysis of Nanomaterials: Exposing Nanotechnology's Naked Emperor

Risk analysis (encompassing risk assessment, management, and communication) is touted internationally as the most appropriate approach for governing nanomaterials. In this article, we survey existing criticisms of risk assessment as a basis for regulatory decision making on emerging technologies, particularly highlighting its exclusion of key societal dimensions, its epistemological underdetermination, and its lack of democratic accountability. We then review the specific case of nanomaterials and identify six major barriers to the effective operation of both risk assessment and risk management. These include a lack of: nano‐specific regulatory requirements, shared definitions, validated and accessible methods for safety testing, available scientific knowledge, reliable information on commercial use, and capacity for exposure mitigation. Finding the knowledge, standards, methods, tools, definitions, capacity, and political commitment all insufficient, we argue that risk analysis is a “naked emperor” for nanomaterial governance. We therefore suggest that additional concepts and approaches are essential for nanomaterials policy and regulation.