移民、血缘与信仰变迁——以台湾客家巫氏为例

巫罗俊是闽西客家巫氏的先祖,在巫氏族人祠堂中,他比较罕见地以塑像的形式为后人祀奉;而他带领当地民众开基立业的壮举,更使得其由"祖"而"神",升格为宁化县的土地神。清中叶闽(粤)客家巫氏族人大量移民台湾,他们数典不忘祖,皆铭记巫罗俊为始祖,并慎终追远,直至今日仍坚持定期到宁化巫氏公祠赡拜祖先,表现出血缘关系的承传和延续。在迁台过程中,巫罗俊崇拜在台湾也由"人"升格为"神",演变为王爷信仰这一颇具地方色彩的神明角色,它提醒我们要注意福建民间信仰在台湾自然、人文环境下所产生的调适与衍变,只有正视这种差异性才能更好地为我们论证闽台文化同一性树立科学论说。     

现代公司的变革：管理与领导

组织变革是战后组织研究领域的热门话题,而组织变革理论得到运用最多的是在企业界。众多成功公司,将成功的原因归结于公司变革。但事实上,变革也可能给公司带来失败。公司的生机来自于对公司管理的变革,公司变革的效益和可持续健康发展来自于对公司变革的管理和领导。可以按照“5W1H”和管理的思维进行变革的分析、设计和实施。变革中,领导应当是成功的核心因素。     

How the court made a federation of the EU

We analyze the European institutional integration that took place in the 1950s and 1960s as a two-stage process. Firstly, an explicitly political project aims at establishing a European political community. The project is abandoned in the mid-1950s and political integration stops. At that time, the institutions of the Union take the form of a confederation. In a second stage, because of the failure of the European political community, a legal process of integration driven by the European Court of Justice takes place. This second stage of unification is more centralizing and in effect leads to a federalization of the European institutional structure. The transformation of the political structure of the European Union thus appears to result from the actions and decisions of a legal entity, the European Court of Justice.      

庭审中心主义理念下侦查模式的变革

在强调法治、人权的时代,无论从价值取向还是实践的效用来看,英美法国家“庭审中心主义”的诉讼构造越来越得到理论界的认可。大陆法国家也已经、正在并将继续从英美法国家中吸收越来越多的制度设计,可以说“庭审中心主义”的诉讼构造是各国发展的一个趋势。在这种潮流下,我国的刑事诉讼程序已经作了部分变革,基本上可以说是已经具有“准庭审中心主义”的诉讼构造。但是,侦查模式却与”庭审中心主义”的要求格格不入。可以各国侦查模式的共性作为我国侦查模式变革的模板,变革我国侦查模式。     

日本“政治大国”走向与自主防卫

进入20世纪80年代以后,作为经济强国的日本已经不再满足于“经济大国政治小国”的地位,历届内阁开始要求与经济大国地位相适应的政治大国地位。日本政府在寻求实现政治大国目标的过程中,主要选择了以军事领域作为突破口,以成为军事大国带动政治大国目标的实现。具体体现在强化日美同盟、建立和完善有事法制、保持自主、高效的自卫力量与积极参与联合国维和行动四个方面。     

法院人事制度改革中对资深法官的保护

学问渊博、经验丰富的资深法官是不可多得的司法财富 ,我国应从人事制度上给予他们特殊的对待和保护。     

Biotic Carbon Sequestration and the Kyoto Protocol: The Construction of Global Knowledge by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

This paper explores the dynamics of the production of global knowledge by an international knowledge organization, in this case the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Based on previous notions of international boundary organizations, the idea of international knowledge organizations emphasizes the knowledge generation function of such organizations rather than their convening function. Using the case of controversial Kyoto Protocol biotic carbon sequestration policies, I argue that boundary work and uncertainty management are the essential dynamics in the successful construction of global knowledge by international knowledge organizations. This uncertainty management occurs in a manner broadly, although not completely, in conformance with the institutional preferences of powerful policy actors. Global knowledge can legitimate and help refine global policies, but the process of its construction must be iterative and transparent if it is to be credible for global environmental governance over the long-term.     

拓宽培训思路提高培训质量的探讨

本文就如何提高培训质量进行了探讨,从拓宽培训思路和改变培训方式入手,提出培训项目的设计要贴近实际需求,通过由求全变求实、由备讲变备学、由灌注变互动和由知识变行为四种方式改变施教方式,积极研究工作方法,确实解决实际问题,从而提升幼儿教师培训质量。     

Fractured International Environmental Governance and the Potential Role of the Commonwealth in Biodiversity and Climate Change

Abstract

This paper begins by examining the reasons behind most failures of governance, including fault lines in institutional and professional specialisation, and in ideology. These three, forever competing within and between themselves, frustrate attempts to find solutions to some of the world's most pressing challenges. Not least among these are environmental challenges, where preferences and priorities that are geographically, professionally or ideologically narrow inevitably fail to achieve solutions for the greater good. What role can the Commonwealth play in addressing the fracture lines that bedevil solutions for climate change and biodiversity? It may help to stimulate global action on these issues if it can encourage agreement across multidimensional global boundaries. We know the Commonwealth is not a leading global force for controlling climate change or biodiversity loss; but if it had the political will it could be an exemplar of how, between a group of vastly diverse countries across the globe—and on the global political stage—binding agreement and positive action on climate change and biodiversity could be promoted and perhaps achieved. One of the strongest features of the Commonwealth is the generation of long-standing legal and ethical norms whose appeal is obvious even if their implementation is lacking. These norms should not be limited to the rule of law, democracy and human rights, but should include environmental norms because these too are fundamental to a satisfactory human condition.