对如何进一步强化新时期中心城区公安基层基础建设的思考

公安部党委将2006年作为全国公安机关的“基层基础年”,组织全国公安机关抓基层,打基础,苦练基本功。要确保公安工作的可持续发展,必须用战略眼光、从全局的高度认识基层基础建设的客观性和必要性,正视基层基础建设中存在的问题并客观深入地分析其原因,从重点和热点问题入手,全面提升公安基层基础建设的水平。     

公民行政诉讼救济权的保护

我国行政诉讼法的颁布 ,标志着我国法院已开始依据其司法权对行政权进行制衡 ,并且成为监督政府行政法治化、切实保障公民的合法权益不受行政机关的侵害的重要措施。但公民的行政诉讼救济权仍受到种种制约 ,我国司法制度的改革应对公民的行政诉讼救济权予以关注。本文对公民行政诉讼救济权概念和内涵进行初步界定 ,并探讨了其保障的具体机制。     

香港警方处置劫持人质事件模式研究

研究劫持人质事件、吸取先进的处置经验并不断改善我们的处置措施是非常紧迫和必要的。通过对香港警方应对劫持人质事件的基本理念、指挥机制和处置模式的考察,并结合内地公安机关有关经验和做法,我们必须制定“劫持人质事件处置程序”;建立集中、统一的现场指挥体系;加强专业谈判队伍的建设。     

论公司的社会责任——以公司分立为视角

公司的社会责任是学术界和企业界历来争议较多的问题。即使新《公司法》进行了具体规定,人们对其在深层次上的讨论仍未减少。因此,有必要结合社会现状及相关理论作进一步的分析,来界定社会责任的倡导性规范,明确公司的根本利益所在,将公司的社会责任分为强制性与提倡性两个方面,进而归结为四个层次,从而在公司分立的情况下,更好地维护公司的利益和确保公司社会责任的承担。     

“法官不得拒绝裁判”原则的逻辑再造:从绝对性到相对性

作为一项现代司法原则,"法官不得拒绝裁判"已然广泛运用于我国司法实践中。在回应实践发展的理论研究中,"法官不得拒绝裁判"原则的本质界定居于中心位置。实践中,当事人视角下的"唯满意论"解读和裁判者视角下的"唯制定法论"解读,使其陷入了绝对化的陷阱,尤其在司法责任之归责模式上陷入"全有"或"全无"的窘境。"法官不得拒绝裁判"原则应当提倡作相对性解读:就整体层面而言,表现为司法解决纠纷范围的有限性;就具体层面而言,表现为司法裁判的过程性与"拒绝裁判"的多元性、"拒绝裁判"评价标准的客观性与合理性以及"拒绝裁判"受司法责任调整的有限性。唯有如此,"法官不得拒绝裁判"原则的规范意涵才能得以彰显。     

Towards a liberalisation of standing conditions for individuals seeking judicial review of Community acts: Jégo-Quéré et Cie SA v Commission and Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council

The concept of ‘individual concern’, the main admissibility requirement for actions brought by individual applicants for the annulment of Community acts not addressed to them under Article 130 EC, has traditionally been interpreted restrictively by the Community courts, thereby constituting a nearly insurmountable obstacle for individual seeking judicial review of Community acts of general application. In a recent decision, the CFI, referring to the newly adopted EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (Article 47 on the right to an effective judicial remedy), proposed a new and more liberal interpretation of that requirement, thereby widening access to judicial review for individual, companies and representative groups. The Court of Justice has not followed up, but seems to leave the door open for further developments towards a liberalisation of standing conditions.     

Opening up personal data protection: A conceptual controversy

The existence of a fundamental right to the protection of personal data in European Union (EU) law is nowadays undisputed. Established in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in 2000, it is increasingly permeating EU secondary law, and is expected to play a key role in the future EU personal data protection landscape. The right's reinforced visibility has rendered manifest the co-existence of two possible and contrasting interpretations as to what it come to mean. If some envision it as a primarily permissive right, enabling the processing of such data under certain conditions, others picture it as having a prohibitive nature, implying that any processing of data is a limitation of the right, be it legitimate or illegitimate. This paper investigates existing tensions between different understandings of the right to the protection of personal data, and explores the assumptions and conceptual legacies underlying both approaches. It traces their historical lineages, and, focusing on the right to personal data protection as established by the EU Charter, analyses the different arguments that can ground contrasted readings of its Article 8. It also reviews the conceptualisations of personal data protection as present in the literature, and finally contrasts all these perspectives with the construal of the right by the EU Court of Justice.     

论法人的基本权利主体地位

美国宪法并没有规定公司是基本权利主体,美国联邦最高法院在很多判例中亦认定美国宪法的特权与豁免条款不适用于公司。宪法第14修正案通过后,尤其是自19世纪80年代以来,美国联邦最高法院逐渐将宪法的保护扩大适用于公司,使得公司成为某些宪法基本权利的主体。这一转变迎合了美国经济发展的需要,使得国内统一大市场的建立成为可能。本文借鉴美国的宪法实践,细致梳理了公司作为基本权利主体的相关理论。     

抓住三个重点打牢三个基础苦练三个基本功促进"三基"建设

公安机关加强基层基础建设,必须抓住思想认识、班子建设、典型示范,激发基层活力;打牢人口管理、情报信息、制度建设三个基础,增强基层实力;苦练应知应会、执法办案、群众工作三个基本功,提高民警综合素质.     

由"木桶理论"谈如何加强公安基层基础建设

加强公安基层基础建设,公安机关应建立合理的警力分流机制、有效的警务保障机制、良好的用人导向机制、科学的工作考核机制和系统的基层基础工作机制.