发挥比较优势促进黑龙江经济的发展

农业尤其是绿色食品产业是黑龙江省的优势产业,建立和培育现代物流体系和大型绿色食品批发市场,有利于农业尤其是绿色食品的产业化经营,有利于促进黑龙江经济的发展和拉动就业的增长.     

论循环型社会发展的执行体系与制度创新——以江苏为例

循环社会发展的本质特征是一种社会生活方式和生产及消费模式的转型,即从注重物质消费经济人向注重人与自然和谐、追求环境质量最大化的生态人的转型。近年来江苏的现代化进程和社会经济进一步协调发展为这种系统转型提供了较好的社会基础,而积极构建循环型社会的规划建设体系、政策支撑体系、组织管理体系、制度推进体系、法律保障体系,将为循环社会的建成提供基本动力和重要条件。     

环境友好型社会呼唤绿色政治文明

生态问题实质上是政治问题,构建环境友好型社会必须促使生态学与政治学联姻,大力推进绿色政治文明建设。绿色政治文明的基本内容有绿色政治文化价值、绿色政治行为文明以及绿色政治制度文明,它们从多维角度促进着人与环境友好型社会的建设。     

Non-institutional Barriers to Women＇s Leadership and Countermeasures

随着经济全球化和信息时代的发展,越来越多的女性领导者出现在政府机关和企事业单位的领导岗位上。女性领导者自身所拥有的特殊性格和品质使其在社会经济发展过程中的地位和作用不断提高,但传统文化、心理特性、社会习惯及女性群体自身的特质等一些非制度性的障碍因素仍制约着女性领导力的提升,因此,在新形势下,积极提升女性领导者的领导意愿、塑造女性领导者的人本主义精神和人性化的领导风格、提高女性领导者的科学决策水平、保障女性领导者的权益和工作时间对提升女性领导力显得尤为必要。     

The Green Challenge and Political Competition: How Typical is the German Experience?

Despite apparent successes in recent years, the Green challenge in western Europe remains electorally marginal, and the various Green parties seem to perform substantially below their potential. By comparison to other new and small parties, they have also proved very slow to break through the executive threshold. Far from mobilising a wholly new politics, their role has become that of a radical ginger group to the left of the social democrats. Nonetheless, it is as part of the left that they may yet make their most important contribution, in that their participation in government in Germany and elsewhere has the potential to transform traditional patterns of centrist coalition formation into more bipolar and alternating systems of competition. The emergence of the Greens has also helped the left to gain a strategic advantage over the right.     

论WTO《贸易技术壁垒协议》对云南烟草发展的影响

WTO<贸易技术壁垒协议>作为非关税壁垒的主要方面,制定了一些较严格的技术法规和技术标准.云南烟草业在面对<贸易技术壁垒协议>的同时,如何结合烟草国际贸易的实际情况,利用烟草贸易技术壁垒的相关建议,提高云南烟草企业的综合素质和产品核心竞争力,是云南烟草业能否在进入WTO之后居于不败之地的关键.     

Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?

Across the world, ‘green grabbing’ – the appropriation of land and resources for environmental ends – is an emerging process of deep and growing significance. The vigorous debate on ‘land grabbing’ already highlights instances where ‘green’ credentials are called upon to justify appropriations of land for food or fuel – as where large tracts of land are acquired not just for ‘more efficient farming’ or ‘food security’, but also to ‘alleviate pressure on forests’. In other cases, however, environmental green agendas are the core drivers and goals of grabs – whether linked to biodiversity conservation, biocarbon sequestration, biofuels, ecosystem services, ecotourism or ‘offsets’ related to any and all of these. In some cases these involve the wholesale alienation of land, and in others the restructuring of rules and authority in the access, use and management of resources that may have profoundly alienating effects. Green grabbing builds on well-known histories of colonial and neo-colonial resource alienation in the name of the environment – whether for parks, forest reserves or to halt assumed destructive local practices. Yet it involves novel forms of valuation, commodification and markets for pieces and aspects of nature, and an extraordinary new range of actors and alliances – as pension funds and venture capitalists, commodity traders and consultants, GIS service providers and business entrepreneurs, ecotourism companies and the military, green activists and anxious consumers among others find once-unlikely common interests. This collection draws new theorisation together with cases from African, Asian and Latin American settings, and links critical studies of nature with critical agrarian studies, to ask: To what extent and in what ways do ‘green grabs’ constitute new forms of appropriation of nature? How and when do circulations of green capital become manifest in actual appropriations on the ground – through what political and discursive dynamics? What are the implications for ecologies, landscapes and livelihoods? And who is gaining and who is losing – how are agrarian social relations, rights and authority being restructured, and in whose interests?     

瑞士“绿色山地经济模式”对贵州发展的启示

瑞士地处欧洲内陆，历史上是个资源贫瘠、较为落后的农牧业国家。在自然地理条件与产业发展条件上，现阶段的贵州和历史上的瑞士有着很大的相似性，从自然地理特征和第一、二、三产业发展条件来看，瑞士和贵州在发展第一、二产业上有一定劣势，在发展第三产业上略有优势，“后发赶超”一直是二者经济社会发展的主题。瑞士“绿色山地经济模式”的成功经验是：准确选择主导产业、积极构筑中小企业的产业集群、注重科技创新与人力资源开发、坚持生态环境与经济发展的综合平衡。“绿色赶超”是瑞士克服地理区位、资源禀赋等经济发展劣势，发展成世界上环境最优美、生活最富裕国家的重要路径；瑞士模式对贵州“绿色赶超”有着重大而深刻的启示。     

African Green Revolution,food sovereignty and constrained livelihood choice in Mozambique

This article examines the complicated food security agendas of the African Green Revolution and the food sovereignty models in Mozambique. Drawing on fieldwork conducted by the author in Mozambique in 2014 and 2015, the paper analyses how smallholder farmers engage with these two agrarian models. Whereas the literature frequently presents the African Green Revolution and the food sovereignty in oppositional frames, this paper finds that farmers in Mozambique utilize some of the tools that these models offer in complementary rather than competing ways. One such area is the use of commercial hybrid seeds and herbicides by some farmers associated with food sovereignty, an approach that runs counter to food sovereignty’s principles of agroecology. In Mozambique, farmers’ “lived experience” of food sovereignty is more a strategic response to their limited livelihood options, using whatever tools are available to them, rather than a resistance to power.