恐怖主义的发展过程及思想渊源

作为国家政治斗争的特殊表现形式,冷战后国际恐怖主义对国际社会的安全构成了　极大的威胁。尽管世界各国都意识到恐怖主义的危害性,但对恐怖主义的认识还是千差万别　,造成国际反恐怖合作举步维艰,打击效果不显著。从历史角度分析,恐怖主义的发展经历　了四个不同的发展时期,各个时期表现出不同的特点。近现代恐怖主义的发展还与一些极端　思潮关系密切,这些思潮,如宗教极端思想、无政府主义、种族主义、新纳粹主义等等,对　恐怖主义的发展起到指导和推动的作用。     

元代以来地方行政价值实现的审视--结合“公共管理模型”与“地方行政史例”

基于Christopher Hood公共管理三重价值的视角,选取元以降（元、明、清、民国）四个历史单元为案例,审视和比较其地方行政的演化轨迹、横纵架构和运行成效。尝试一个“西方当代公共管理理论”和“中国古代地方行政实践”相结合的独特研究路径,结合“管理模型”和“史料分析”,构建一个地方行政价值实现的框架模型（LAVAM）,探究地方行政的纵向组织层级、横向权力统分与公共管理三重价值——公正、效率、稳健之间的联系与规律,以现代公共管理理论和研究方法剖析元以降地方行政历史演化的客观规律和内在逻辑,启迪地方行政改革与央地关系探索“,以今审古”“、以古鉴今”。     

司马迁生年及相关问题考辨

新发现的《史记正义》佚表明：《博物志》的资料是推考司马迁生年的唯一原始资料,也是司马贞、张守节共同依据的史料。据此推算,司马迁只能是生于武帝建元六年而不可能是景帝中元五年。由此推考,《游侠列传》等五篇赞语中的“太史公”应是司马谈而不是司马迁,这些篇目的写作应自司马谈始。     

汉代《西域传》书写模式的形成浅析

从商代到东汉,华夏族群①的西部边界呈逐渐西移的趋势。两汉时期的西域,已经达到汉朝移民所能生存的生态极限和汉朝政权行政力量控制的极限。但为了抵御来自北方匈奴人的压力,汉朝极力突破这条客观存在的界限。在这个政治因素的推动下,汉朝形成了独特的西域历史记忆,并用《西域传》的方式被历代中央王朝所继承,维系并巩固了西域与中原王朝的统一。     

Research note: The founders and survivors project

This paper describes the multidisciplinary project Founders and Survivors: Australian Life Courses in Historical Context. Individual life courses, families and generations through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries are being reconstituted from a wide range of data including convict records; birth, death and marriage registrations; and World War I service records. The project will result in a longitudinal study of Australian settlement, the long-run effects of forced labour and emigration on health and survival, family formation, intergenerational morbidity and mortality, and social and geographic mobility.     

中国—新加坡经济走廊建设的若干问题

近几年,关于中国(南宁)—新加坡经济走廊建设的问题引起有关国家智库、产业界乃至政府的高度关注。本文对中国(南宁)—新加坡经济走廊的基本构想、面临的历史机遇和挑战等进行探讨,并提出相关建议。     

Hitler's Shadow: Historical Analogies and the Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait

Leaders often turn to history for guidance. Margaret Thatcher and George Bush were no exception when they responded to Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Bush and Thatcher used analogies to the 1930s, the Vietnam War and the Falklands War to frame the crisis, which significantly influenced their policies. They argued that Saddam Hussein was another Adolf Hitler and were determined not to repeat the mistakes of the Western response to the Axis in the 1930s or of the Vietnam War. There would be no 1930s-style appeasement of Iraq, and no slow escalation as had occurred in Vietnam. The prompt use of overwhelming force in the Gulf would succeed, Bush and Thatcher believed, just as the use of force had succeeded in the Falklands crisis, and just as such a policy, they believed, would have deterred the Axis in the early 1930s.     

“读懂”马克思——“五种‘社会形态”’说对马克思“社会”、“经济的社会形态”和“社会形态”范畴的混淆

所谓“五种‘社会形态”’的“社会形态”,混淆马克思原著文本新唯物主义史观人类社会历史发展“社会”、“经济的社会形态”“社会形态”不同范畴的原意;是对马克思“社会”、“经济的社会形态”和“社会形态”三范畴与生产力原理不同关系混同。