加强党校图书馆信息服务保障工作——基于重点学科建设的视角

党校重点学科建设是一项事关党校教育事业科学发展的战略性任务,而党校图书馆作为党校教学和科研服务的文献信息中心,虽然拥有为重点学科建设提供信息服务保障的优势,但其仍然存在一些与重点学科建设所需求的信息服务不相适应的问题,如数字资源服务的内容有待拓展、整体素质有待提高等。因此,党校图书馆必须通过加强纸质文献资源建设、拓展数字资源服务内容、重构图书馆组织架构、加强人才队伍建设等途径加强信息服务保障工作,以期更好地为党校重点学科建设服务。     

国外多导仪犯罪心理测试的准确性评价与发展趋势

经过一百多年的发展,利用多导仪进行犯罪心理测试不同程度地被50多个国家所接受,但对于它的质疑并没有停止过。在对近年来国外关于准绳问题测试和隐蔽信息测试的评价与研究成果进行罗列及评价的基础上,可以发现,未来犯罪心理测试技术虽然由于其心理学原理的科学性而受到争议,并且对于测试人员的经验性要求较高,但是只要严格按照标准进行测试,其准确性仍然能够得到保障。     

EU update

This is the latest edition of Baker & McKenzie’s column on developments in EU law relating to IP, IT and telecommunications. This article summarises recent developments that are considered important for practitioners, students and academics in a wide range of information technology, e-commerce, telecommunications and intellectual property areas. It cannot be exhaustive but intends to address the important points. This is a hard copy reference guide, but links to outside websites are included where possible. No responsibility is assumed for the accuracy of information contained in these links.     

European national news

The regular article tracking developments at the national level in key European countries in the area of IT and communications – co-ordinated by Herbert Smith LLP and contributed to by firms across Europe. This column provides a concise alerting service of important national developments in key European countries. Part of its purpose is to compliment the Journal’s feature articles and briefing notes by keeping readers abreast of what is currently happening “on the ground” at a national level in implementing EU level legislation and international conventions and treaties. Where an item of European National News is of particular significance, CLSR may also cover it in more detail in the current or a subsequent edition.     

论经济犯罪侦查信息

侦查学基础理论关注对侦查情报的研究,但是鲜有论及侦查信息,从概念指向而言,侦查信息和侦查情报不能等同。信息时代,深入研究侦查信息已经成为一种必然趋势。在经济犯罪侦查领域,研究经济犯罪侦查信息可以帮助侦查主体培养正确的侦查思维,帮助侦查主体树立信息意识和证据意识,帮助侦查主体灵活选择侦查模式,同时还可以正确引导侦查决策。深入研究经济犯罪侦查信息理论对于经济犯罪侦查实务工作也会产生影响,其集中体现在建立和完善经济犯罪侦查协作机制、建立经济犯罪情报系统和建立经济侦查专门队伍三方面。     

技术与社会的互构——以信息通讯技术在商村社会的应用为例

技术与社会的关系是一个重要命题。本文以产业和社会结构发生剧烈变化的商业农村为个案,探讨技术与社会的关系,研究发现固定电话与手机的应用深刻地影响了商村的经济生产,它们在应用中的悖论现象则表明技术亦受社会的型塑:当熟人社会瓦解,信任机制发生改变时,固定电话因其完备的管理制度被使用者赋予隐秘的社会内涵;商村产业特征及经营策略压缩了经营者的私人空间和时间,致其将手机定位于商业信息传递的工具;漂泊的打工者在封闭的空间中更加渴求交流,因而在手机使用上表现出更强烈的情感倾向。此外,本文还想强调是使用者发挥了主体性,穿梭于信息技术产品与社会结构之间,赋予信息技术产品以生动的社会内涵,从而形成了具有地方社会特色的技术应用情况。     

视频图像侦查中视频信息内容分析初探

视频信息内容分析是视频图像侦查的重要内容之一。围绕案件相关要素来搜寻和发现涉案的视频图像资料,能为视频信息内容分析提供良好的基础。然后紧密围绕涉案人员图像、涉案车辆图像、涉案物品图像进行分析,并将获取的相关信息应用与侦查实践。     

论内幕交易、泄露内幕信息罪中“非法获取人员”的认定——美国法的“信息泄露理论”与“盗用理论”在中国的适用

中国法将内幕交易、泄露内幕信息罪的主体规定为知情人员与非法获取人员,而关于非法获取人员的范围与认定标准等都欠缺详细的规定。依据立法规定,并参照外国法理论,非法获取人员应是指除内幕人员外,可以凭借与发行公司或内幕人员的关系而非法获得内幕信息的人员,或者利用非法手段取得内幕信息的人员。对非法知情人员,美国判例则创制出了＂信息泄露理论＂与＂盗用理论＂以规制该类人员的内幕交易责任。对内幕人员的配偶与直系血亲,中国法应明文规定其相关责任,并利用＂信息泄露理论＂进行规制,而对其他以非法手段获知内幕信息的人员,则不妨适用＂盗用理论＂以进行惩治。     

Quo vadis information society? Notification of draft rules on e-services in the EU

From its inception the European legislator has adopted a mixed approach to the regulation of a novel and complex phenomenon of the Internet based commerce. The idea of harmonisation or approximation of laws has been accompanied by a parallel process of monitoring of draft laws pertaining to e-commerce, known as the notification procedure under 98/34/EC directive related to information society services. The aim of this paper is to analyse the notification principle in the light of the Notification Directive as well as the practice of states as evidenced by data gathered in a database of submitted drafts.     

Edem v. The Information Commissioner and The Financial Services Authority [2014] EWCA Civ 92

From time to time the Court of Appeal feels the need to steer inferior courts and tribunals away from an over-enthusiastic application of a particular direction of travel signposted by its own previous decisions. In the Edem judgment, published on 7 February 2014, the court has taken the opportunity to restrict significantly the application of its decision more than a decade ago in Durant v. Financial Services Authority, ¹ a case that has been relied on by many commercial data protection practitioners to deny subject access or the wider application of the Data Protection Act 1998 on the grounds that the data were not personal in that they did not relate to the individual in question even though the individual's name appeared as part of the data.