军事司法权能否推定

现代法治要求以权力法定为原则,以权力推定为例外。由于军事法理研究相对薄弱,以及法律与实践的内在冲突,军事司法权受军事统率权控制的制度惯性延续至今,表现在我国军事司法权配置中存在许多权力推定现象。基于现代法治的内在要求,以及依法治国方略和依法治军方针的现实需要,特别是军事司法权属于国家司法权的理论定位,在军事司法权配置实践中,应当严格限制军事司法权的推定,逐步实现从权力推定向权力法定的过渡,军事领导机关不宜再行使军事司法立法权,军事司法机关也不宜再行使军事司法解释权。     

刑事司法解释主体二元化研究

对于刑事司法解释主体二元化所出现的冲突的解决之道,并不在于简单地否定检察解释权的存在合理性,而在于从权力体制上明确两者的权力属性.针对两种解释权力的联合所出现的司法权的混乱,我们应当提倡司法解释权力行使的独立原则.     

隔代探望权的法律分析--对我国《婚姻法》第38条的思考

应用文义解释、扩张解释、目的解释和比较解释的法律解释方法,在我国《婚姻法》第38条文义“可预测的可能性”范围内,对第38条探望权人的范围应当得出赋予祖父母、外祖父母探望权的合理而妥当的解释。     

辛词题材构成解读

辛弃疾词体创作的题材类型多达30类,为两宋词体创作题材类型最多的作家.伴随其宦海浮沉,取材也表现出比较明显的阶段性特征.仕宦期的主要题材为交游、祝颂、咏怀等,闲退期的主要题材为交游、隐逸、咏物等;可见仕宦期多取社会性较强的题材,而闲退期多取社会性较弱的题材.至于两期均居第一的交游题材,则表明豪放派词人投身社会人生的恒久热情与不懈努力.传统文化的浸润渗透,当代政治的激荡震刷,个人修养的组运熔铸,是影响辛词题材构成的几个主要方面.     

An Overview of 3D Printing in Forensic Science: The Tangible Third-Dimension

There has been a rapid development and utilization of three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies in engineering, health care, and dentistry. Like many technologies in overlapping disciplines, these techniques have proved to be useful and hence incorporated into the forensic sciences. Therefore, this paper describes how the potential of using 3D printing is being recognized within the various sub-disciplines of forensic science and suggests areas for future applications. For instance, the application can create a permanent record of an object or scene that can be used as demonstrative evidence, preserving the integrity of the actual object or scene. Likewise, 3D printing can help with the visualization of evidential spatial relationships within a scene and increase the understanding of complex terminology within a courtroom. However, while the application of 3D printing to forensic science is beneficial, currently there is limited research demonstrated in the literature and a lack of reporting skewing the visibility of the applications. Therefore, this article highlights the need to create good practice for 3D printing across the forensic science process, the need to develop accurate and admissible 3D printed models while exploring the techniques, accuracy and bias within the courtroom, and calls for the alignment of future research and agendas perhaps in the form of a specialist working group.     

If Theory and Practice Were the Same,Then What? A New Approach to Designing Professional Education

Professional education has for decades been based on the premise that theory and practice are dichotomous, and that somehow a way must be found to enable professional practitioners to translate theory (the knowledge they acquire) into practice (what they actually do). The article examines the relationship between theory and practice, contending that theory and practice are the same, and proposes a model of professional education based on this premise. Based primarily on hermeneutic philosophy, a number of approaches to professional education are described that are quite different than those generally employed today.     

“HU 理论”在工资集体谈判中的运用构想探析

工资集体谈判制度是职工工资的民主决策方式,也是工会保障职工经济权益的重要手段。作为当前以改善民生为重点的社会建设的一项战略性任务,工资集体谈判在具体的实践过程中起到了一定的积极作用,尤其是在保障职工最低工资等方面成效显著。由于当前工会方的经济非独立性,从而使谈判话语权较弱,以及企业和职工对经营成果分配的不满等,导致谈判质量较低,特别是职工工资增长的谈判不够理想,从而使利益分配成为工资集体谈判的关键点。为此,针对工资谈判中的利益分配问题,本研究试图设计一个既能够满足企业的利益需求,又能够维护职工的正常工资需求的"工资联合确定模式",即在工资谈判中运用"HU理论",进行操作,实现劳资双赢,从而化解工资集体谈判在实践中的实施难题。     

Contextualism, Feminism, and a Canadian Woman Judge

Feminist legal scholars have never cut the first woman appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada as much slack as the second. Yet the first, Justice Bertha Wilson, introduced the contextual method into the Court’s jurisprudence. Her approach to contextualism is consistent with one of three feminist legal methods that Katharine T. Bartlett identifies. More specifically, it is consistent with Bartlett’s feminist practical reasoning. However, Justice Wilson’s contextualism is not without its critics. The most challenging, Ruth Colker, contends it must work in conjunction with a distinctive substantive principle. Justice Wilson took a different approach, aligning the contextual method with the constitutional principle of proportionality. Thus construed, this paper argues, contextualism represents a new approach to feminist judging.

平衡与融合——解读法官释明制度

在民事诉讼中,法官释明制度不是某种诉讼模式的应有之意,也不是某个诉讼原则的当然内容。相反,它是民事诉讼价值追求多元化的体现,是各种看似对立的原则、模式、权利(权力)之间平衡与融合的结果。只有从根本上改变传统的思维方式,放弃对绝对“中心”的诉求,我们才能真正全面地理解法官释明制度的实质。     

论我国刑法立法解释的目标——兼论我国刑法解释的目标

西方法学界所指称的刑法解释目标，实质上是指法官的刑法适用解释的目标，而我国刑法解释体制仅包括刑法立法解释和带有普适性的刑法司法解释两类，并不承认法官的刑法适用解释。长期以来，我国理论界在探讨我国刑法解释目标的选择时，大多是针对刑法司法解释而言，忽视了刑法立法解释自身的特殊性。依照各自的性质、特点及法治现状，我国刑法司法解释应采取以主观解释为主、客观解释为辅的折衷说，而刑法立法解释目标应当采取客观说，以最大限度地满足现实对法律的期盼的目标。