高校院系工会兼职干部激励因素及其绩效影响的研究 —— 以上海市若干所高校为例

研究运用激励理论分析了高校院系兼职工会干部积极性缺乏,动力不足问题产生的原因。在此基础上,构建了激励因素和绩效表现的结构关系,并利用统计分析和结构方程模型分析了两者之间的关系。研究发现,对于兼职工会干部的激励而言,精神回报是核心内容,人文环境能够提供有效保障,不妨碍本职工作是前提和基础,物质回报有利于工作积极性的提高,而个人成长是非常重要的因素。     

The Impact of the Threat of Terrorism on U.S. District Court Decisions During Wartime

Federal courts are key actors in the U.S. government’s fight against terrorism because they adjudicate cases based on the USA PATRIOT Act, and accordingly make national security policy. We examine the extent that the terror threat influences judicial decisions in a dataset of 111 USA PATRIOT Act cases decided in the U.S. District Courts from 2001 through 2013, while controlling for other judicial decision-making variables. The results demonstrate that when a case involves a heightened terror threat, federal judges are more likely to defer to the government. Some key control variables are also significant.     

正确评估《劳动合同法》 适时修改《劳动法》

要客观评价《劳动合同法》,该法对促进劳动力资源市场配置、规范劳动关系发挥了重要作用。目前并没有确切数据证实《劳动合同法》给企业带来不合理用工成本。就用工灵活而言,无固定期限合同是市场经济国家普遍的现象。因为违反规章解除和相关弹性概念的存在,《劳动合同法》的解除保护也并非是彻底刚性的。由于修法的共识并没有形成,相关立法的配套问题没有解决以及经济下行的特殊背景,目前修改《劳动合同法》的时机并不成熟。此外,真正给企业带来负担的是税负等其他因素,修改《劳动合同法》并不能解决企业负担问题。我国劳动关系协调机制的整个问题是集体合同制度不能发挥作用,劳动关系分层处理未能完成。在短期内,解决现有问题应充分发挥司法的能     

关于对我国劳动合同法认识的探讨

劳动法律侧重保护劳动者利益是世界劳动法律坚持的铁则,我国劳动合同法应当坚持保护劳动者利益的原则。从我国劳动关系的现状看,劳动立法应当向劳动者倾斜,对劳动合同法的偏见应当纠正。应该认识到,劳动合同法既不是对劳动者的单保护法,没有给劳动者提供"铁饭碗",也没有增加用人单位的经营成本。同时,低端加工制造业向外转移与劳动合同法的实施没有必然联系。     

论赠与人的责任

赠与合同是现实生活中常见的合同之一,《合同法》设专章进行了规定,但对赠与人的责任规定得较为简单和概括。赠与人的责任可归纳为瑕疵责任（包括故意不告知受赠人瑕疵、保证无瑕疵、附义务的赠与）、缔约责任（包括无故撤销赠与及恶意磋商等）和违约责任等三种,其承担责任的条件、责任方式、赔偿范围等各不相同。     

我国证券投资基金契约结构设计之检讨

证券投资基金契约结构是证券投资基金法制的核心。我国证券投资基金法律中存在有关基金契约结构的条款相互矛盾, 基金契约订约方间法律责任不明, 基金发起人充当基金契约订约方违反代理法理、并可能损害投资人权益等弊端, 我国基金契约结构设计应在明确投资基金和基金契约独特的法律地位和性质前提下, 通过修改完善相关规定, 采纳三位一体的二元投资基金契约结构模式, 即以基金管理人、托管人为订约方, 投资者为相关受益方的三位一体型态, 从而形成基金管理人、托管人为实质受托人, 受益人为实质委托人的二元结构。     

分洪与赔偿

分洪是政府的公用征调行为,其目的在于紧急避险,公司征调则是实现紧急避险的必要方法。政府向受损人赔偿的数额应取决于因分洪或转移财产而造成的实际损失。     

Breach of Confidence as a Privacy Remedy in the Human Rights Act Era

This article examines the impact of the Human Rights Act (HRA) on the current lack of a remedy for non-consensual publication of personal information by the media. It argues that the action for breach of confidence is now ripe for development into a privacy law in all but name and that the normative impetus for this enterprise can be found in the HRA which will require domestic courts to consider Convention jurisprudence. It will suggest that when Strasbourg decisions are examined in the context of more general Convention doctrines, they may be seen to suggest the need for an effective privacy remedy. Drawing upon approaches from other jurisdictions it seeks to demonstrate that principled solutions may be found to the thicket of legal problems associated with such development. It contends that the main objection to this enterprise, the perceived threat to media freedom, is largely misplaced, as analysis at the theoretical and doctrinal levels reveals that speech and privacy interests are in many respects mutually supportive and the areas of conflict small and readily susceptible to resolution.     

Future Uncertainty as a Challenge to Law's Programmes: The Dilemma of Parental Disputes

The article poses the problem of the need for judges to make 'right' decisions. It then describes how judges have attempted to meet this requirement in difficult cases concerning parental disputes over contact with children where there have been allegations of domestic violence. Applying Luhmann's concepts of the legal system, law's function, law's coding and law's programmes (Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Society's Law) 1997), offers a very different perspective on the issue to that of the judiciary or legal commentators who tend to see the issue of the law, determining, with expert help, what is best for the child. Law's function of stabilizing expectations over time obliges it to deal with all matters that come before the courts through the application of 'conditional programmes' and prevents it from applying the 'purpose oriented programmes' of politics and those who see the issue in terms of ideological conflict.     

劳动人事仲裁立法若干问题探讨

鉴于目前劳动争议仲裁委员会与人事争议仲裁委员会对某些案件受理范围发生意见分歧以及同一案件既涉及劳动（人事）争议又涉及民事纠纷应由哪一部门受理等受理案件范围、交叉案件的受理、申请仲裁时效、举证责任、处理争议程序等劳动人事仲裁立法尚无规定或认识不一,应研究确定划分受理案件范围的标准、交叉案件受理的原则、举证责任倒置原则和完善处理程序,以维护职工的合法权益。