排污许可证制度的法理探析

“排污权”是社会个体的环境权益,排污许可权是环境公益集中代表,排污许可权由环保机关行使,其所有权属于人民。“排污权”及其与排污许可权之间必然有矛盾、冲突,排污许可证制度则是这些冲突相妥协的结果,也成为进一步协调这些冲突的工具。     

论欧盟法中跨国企业集团破产的管辖权

跨国企业集团是由在各国成立的不同法律实体以某种形式的控制权或所有权相互连结而形成的经济组织。在欧盟破产法中,跨国企业集团破产管辖权可以分成两个层次:一是基于债务人主要利益中心地的管辖;二是基于债务人营业所所在地的管辖。     

我国诚实信用原则制度体系的构建

要充分发挥诚实信用原则在市场经济活动中的作用,就必须重视诚实信用原则制度体系的构建。在我国,诚实信用原则制度体系的构建既有积极条件,也有消极条件。诚实信用原则制度体系的构建主要包括诚实信用的立法、执法与司法机制,国家公务行为的诚实信用机制,诚实信用的中介服务机制,诚实信用的信息机制,诚实信用的社会监督机制,违反诚实信用原则的处罚机制等。     

人口再生产价值视角的女性生育和劳动权益保障

近年来,我国生育政策进行了几次调整,体现了国家对人口再生产在社会发展中重要性的认同,但是生育率未能得到有效提升,而女性在劳动力市场遭受歧视的现象依然广泛存在.研究认为,生育与工作家庭的冲突是我国生育现状的主要影响因素,而"全面三孩"政策可能加剧这种冲突.研究建议:应以人口再生产与物质生产理论为基础,重新审视人口再生产在...     

东北地区新城疫流行株的分子生物学特性调查

从东北地区发生新城疫 (ND)的病鸡、病鸽和产蛋下降鸡分离到 19株NDV ,对其融合蛋白 (F)基因 5 32bp或 2 80bp片段进行了克隆、测序 (在GenBank中的登录号为AY2 0 86 80～AY2 0 86 98) ,并对各株的F基因序列进行了比较。结果 ,各毒株之间的核苷酸同源性为 83.1%～10 0 % ,氨基酸同源性为 85 .5 %～ 10 0 % ;系统发育进化树分析表明 ,其中 2株与疫苗株V4同属基因Ⅰ型 ,为弱毒株 ;其余 17株为强毒株 ,其中 2株为基因Ⅵ型 ,其余为基因Ⅶ型。表明东北地区目前由 3种基因型的NDV毒株 (Ⅰ型、Ⅵ型、Ⅶ型 )所引发 ,并以基因Ⅶ型为主。另外 ,对其中的代表毒株APMV1/chicken/China/JL 11/ 0 2进行了免疫学试验 ,结果显示 ,LaSota疫苗的免疫保护效果不理想 ,可能是LaSota疫苗免疫鸡群发生ND的主要原因。     

比较法概念的批判与重构

比较法的概念问题是比较法所有问题中的原点性、基石性问题。比较法学家在这一问题上形成了五种有代表性的观点,但这些观点都存在着各种各样的内在缺陷。本文提出,比较法是一门研究世界总体法律格局及其变化的学科。这一新的比较法概念和模式,可以为比较法开辟了新的发展方向和理论空间。     

中国法治模式的法经济学分析

法治模式又称法治道路问题 ,是建设社会主义法治国家的重要理论问题。运用经济学中的生产要素组合的理论作为类比 ,以一种新的视角来研究法治道路问题 ,说明法治的道路在政府推进型和社会演进型之间如何结合的理论问题 ,也许能带来一个解决这个社会问题的困境的思路 ,因为毕竟法治道路问题的研究之路上还有诸多的理论和实践的荆棘潜伏着 ,我们的路依然很漫长。     

Public administration in smart city: A bibliometric analysis

The role of the public administration is crucial for the development of smart cities. Several scholars have highlighted the need for greater contributions focused on the relationship between public administration and smart cities. This work aims to map the contributions on the topic highlighting the status of the field in the recent years. A bibliometric analysis was performed on a sample of articles published in business and management journals. The analysis was carried out using the R-studio Bibliometrics package. Results show that research on the topic is still in an initial stage and has several gaps that future studies could fill. The study is useful for scholars because it identifies the topics analyzed by previous research and highlights future research questions that could be investigated. The analysis highlighted the areas studied by scholars on the topic: urban planning, sustainable development, governance approach, Internet of Things and information and communication technologies.     

Beyond the Z-score: A novel measure of bank stability for effective policymaking

This article looks beyond Z-score and proposes a novel methodological framework to build an all-encompassing indicator of bank stability for individual banks using the optimisation-based ‘benefit-of-the-doubt (BoD)’ approach. Unlike other available approaches, this approach is totally data-driven and generates endogenous weights to aggregate sub-indicators of bank stability and dimensions. Further, the final outcomes are not limited to a scalar measure of bank stability. The unique optimal weights offer valuable policy-relevant insights and highlight the most precarious areas of stability, which demand the immediate attention of the bank's management and the industry regulators for both micro-and macro-level policymaking. Using the data of Indian public sector banks operating in the year 2018, the study illustrates the proposed framework to obtain a holistic indicator of bank stability, defined on 14 ratio sub-indicators and 5 broad dimensions (soundness, asset quality, profitability, management efficiency, and liquidity) of bank stability.     

Foreign corporate accountability: The contested institutionalization of mandatory due diligence in France and Germany

In the recent past, European states have adopted mandatory due diligence (MDD) laws for holding companies accountable for the environmental and human rights impacts of their supply chains. The institutionalization of the international due diligence norm into domestic legislation has, however, been highly contested. Our contribution analyzes the discursive struggles about the meaning of due diligence that have accompanied the institutionalization of MDD in Germany and France. Based on document analysis and legal analysis of laws and law proposals, we identify a state-centric, a market-based, and a polycentric-governance discourse. These discourses are based on fundamentally different understandings of how the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights should be translated into hard law. By outlining these discourses and comparing the related policy preferences, we contribute with a better understanding of different ways in which MDD is institutionalized, with important consequences for the possibilities to enhance corporate accountability in global supply chains.