网络环境下的高校科技查新途径探析

因特网的出现及电子信息资源建设的快速发展,加快了信息的交流与传播,也给查新工作带来挑战和机遇。解决网络环境下的高校科技查新工作存在的问题,加强文献资源建设、完善检索方法、注重查新队伍建设及建立学科馆员制度,完善高校科技查新途径,已成为新时期查新工作必须解决的重要任务。     

补充侦查造成的超期羁押问题

在我国刑事诉讼司法实践中,存在因补充侦查而造成超期羁押的现象。这不仅严重侵犯了犯罪嫌疑人的合法权益,而且产生了极大的社会负面影响。应当完善相关法律法规,正确适用补充侦查措施,避免由此而造成超期羁押。     

网上侦查的基本模式——网上信息查询

网上侦查是以计算机网络为支撑、以刑事犯罪情报信息数据库及相关管理信息为核心开展破案的侦查方式,其最基本的运作模式是网上信息查询。     

论侦查机关的告知义务

刑事追诉机关在初次讯问犯罪嫌疑人或对其羁押时,应当告知其享有的诉讼权利.这是受刑事追究者获得告知的权利,也是刑事追诉机关的告知义务.现代人权保障制度的发展,不仅要求侦查、检察机关履行告知义务,而且应当依法允许犯罪嫌疑人行使其诉讼权利,并为其权利的实现提供保障.以侦查阶段的初次讯问为对象,对告知义务进行考查,比较美英加法德等国以及我国台湾刑事诉讼法对初次讯问时的告知义务的规定,剖析我国相关法律规定的问题所在,进而对完善我国侦查阶段初次讯问时的告知义务提出了建议.     

侦查监督制度之比较

我国的侦查监督制度与西方国家的侦查监督制度相比较,在侦查监督主体、侦查监督的权源、侦查监督范围等有明显的不同.我国的侦查监督制度的框架体系虽然已经建立,但仍然相当粗疏,必须通过进一步增强检察机关的侦查监督权、建立刑事案件报案制度、将提前介入制度化、建立检察引导机制等措施,完善我国的侦查监督制度.     

加强刑侦"三基"工程建设提升打击犯罪整体水平

公安部将2006年定为“基层基础建设年”,要求全国公安机关“抓基层、打基础、苦练基本功”,打牢公安事业长远发展的基石,提高公安工作和公安队伍建设的整体水平。如何把握这一机遇,深入开展刑侦“三基”工程建设,真正实现“固本强基”的根本目的,是当前各级公安机关特别是刑侦部门亟待思考和解决的问题。笔者认为抓好刑侦“三基”工程建设,应重点在深化认识上下功夫,切实增强抓刑侦“三基”工程建设的积极性和主动性;在科技强侦上下功夫,不断提高侦查破案的科技含量;在信息导侦上下功夫,努力培育新的破案增长点;在刑侦专业基础上下功夫,增强破案打击的发展后劲;在教育培训上下功夫,努力适应新的执法环境。     

当前爆炸案件现场勘查若干思考

爆炸案件现场勘查是获取爆炸信息的重要环节,由于爆炸案件现场的特点决定着勘查必须拟定相应的勘查预案,规范勘查程序。在保证勘查人员安全的情况下,根据案件的实际特点进行物证的发现、固定、提取等工作,并从证据学意义上对物证进行分析。     

论我国刑事错案责任追究制度的完善 ——以侦查机关为视角

我国刑事错案追究制度自实行以来,其运用的合理性以及有效性一直饱受争议。从侦查机关的视角考察,错案追责情况主要存在纠正程序不具体、追责程序透明度不高等相关问题。结合我国实际情况考虑,从内部制度与外部监督入手考虑设立独立的错案追究机关来进行解决是可行的,同时可从细化错案责任追究的相关程序、明晰实体责任性质的认定标准、建立健全办案质量终身责任追究制度和建立追责程序相关信息发布机制等方面来完善刑事错案追究制度。     

Two-dimensional metric comparisons between dynamic bare footprints and insole foot impressions-forensic implications

Footwear may be found at crime scenes as physical evidence. Such footwear often has impression features of the wearer’s foot on the insole of the shoe. Scientific research and literature have established that footprints are distinct. This study compares two-dimensional measurements on bare footprints to foot impressions on insoles to determine if significant differences or similarities exist. Dynamic footprints were collected from 51 donors using the Identicator® Inkless Shoe Print Model LE 25P system. Seven foot length and width measurements were taken based on the Reel linear measurement method. Footprint measurements between bare footprints and foot impressions on the insoles were compared. Only two differences (p > 0.05) were observed between the various bare footprint and insole foot impression measurements on the right and left side for most of the measurements, CALC (p < 0.001) and A1 (p = 0.04). Bare footprint and insole A5 measurements on the left side were also significantly different (p = 0.015). The results of the study have implications in the forensic analysis of foot impression evidence on insoles in footwear in assisting with identifying the wearer of said footwear. Situations may arise in the forensic context when comparing the foot impression on the insole of footwear to a suspect’s bare footprint or a footprint from post-mortem remains. This study contributes to the scant literature available on the topic and to understanding the similarities and differences observed in the various linear measurements that may be utilized in the comparison process of footprint impressions on shoe insoles to bare footprints.