论询问口语运用的基本原则

询问口语是获取证据和线索的重要交际工具。在侦查工作中，要想得到证人、被害人的理解与配合，需要在注意礼貌原则的基础上，把握适合询问的特定语境原则，因人、因时、因地的不同，借助体态语、副语言的配合，有针对性地选择得体的语言表达方式，达到沟通交流，顺利调查取证的目的。     

关于构建上海空防安全网络的设想

确保航空运输的空防安全,是机场公安机关的首要任务。因此,构建以六道防线为主要架构并配以相关运作机制的空防安全网络,是当前机场现代警务机制建设急需解决的问题。     

徘徊在规则与原则之间——评“二奶”受遗赠案的法律论证方法

一夫一妻原则是调整婚姻关系的基本原则 ,本案中遗赠人的重婚行为违反了这一原则 ;根据遗嘱自由原则 ,遗赠人有权依其正当意志处分财产 ,遗嘱自由是调整财产关系的基本原则 ;公序良俗原则是调整民事关系的基本原则 ,人身关系和财产关系都受其约束。在本案中被继承人的遗赠行为非不具有正当目的 ,并不违反公序良俗 ;但被继承人的重婚行为 ,是违反公序良俗的行为。法院的判决发生原则适用上的错位 ,将约束性行为的道德准则和法律原则适用于被继承人的财产行为 ,而该财产行为并无违反公序良俗的情形 ,应直接适用关于遗赠的法律规则。     

跨国电子商务与营业税--中国的选择

中国营业税立法中以劳务发生地为标准的管辖权规则 ,以税务代理和反向征税为主的征收方法 ,都不能完全规范电子商务下的营业税问题。我们应该坚持税收中性原则 ,站稳我国电子商务进口大国的立场 ,对税收管辖权和征管方法作出适时的调整     

法治如何才能形成?--中国足球职业联赛的个案分析及其启示

中国足球职业联赛存在的问题反映了中国法治建设过程中最有代表性的问题,即,法律不具有权威性,行规行法高于法律;法治所必须的权利基础比较薄弱,缺乏强有力的呵护自身利益的市场主体;法治所必须的制度性的权力制约机制不完善,过于依赖群众监督和舆论监督.这三个问题也是限制当前中国法治建设步伐的关键性因素.一个良好的社会秩序只能靠法制.制度与法律才是社会发展的根本保障.     

加入WTO:中国旅游业如何应对?

WTO的各项法规文件和多边贸易规则 ,涵盖非常广泛 ,十分具体细致 ,并且是具有法律效力的规范。因此 ,在推进中国国际旅游发展和对外合作时 ,必须熟悉和掌握WTO的知识和规则 ,认真研究各种条款及细则 ,尽快学会并善于应用WTO的各项规则 ,灵活运用各种例外条款 ,有效地保护自己的利益 ,规范自己的行为 ,逐步开放旅游服务市场和推进中国旅游国际化进程 ,不断提高中国旅游在国际市场上的占有率 ,实现建设世界旅游经济强国的发展目标。     

试论国际法之不成体系问题——兼及国际法规则的冲突与协调

国际法领域的扩展使不同国际法规则之间的冲突大大增加,国际法发展呈现不成体系的特征。演进中的国际法并非一个统一的体系,现代国际法表现为国际共存法和国际合作法并存,并在发展趋向上向价值定向发展。国际法随着范围的扩展形成大量次级体系,不同的次级体系多能“自成体系”并“专题自主”的特征,导致规则的冲突增加,造成在适用国际法规则上的困难。究其原因,一方面由于国际法自身的固有特征,另一方面则是国际法领域的扩展等新趋势导致的。国际法要研究如何防止并协调国际法规则矛盾与冲突,但是很难使之成为一个真正统一的体系,另一方面国际法的不成体系的特性却使国际法充满了张力。     

对刑侦基本作战单位运行机制的几点思考

文章从探讨如何落实刑侦工作责任入手,认为将两人搭档制作为刑事侦查的基本作战单位是保证整个刑侦工作体系高效运行的切入点,并就此提出初步设想。     

Substantive rules of argumentation for value judgment in civil law: In the context of academic practice of civil law in China

Value judgment is at the core of civil law. This paper explores how scholars of civil law reach mutual understanding and consensus on specific value judgment by rational discussion in the context of multiple value orientation. Based on a brief evaluation of the theory of legal argument and with the basic value consensus of Chinese civil law scholars as the premise, this paper proposes two substantive rules of argumentation for scholars of civil law to discuss value judgment: First, a strong of equal treatment should be carried out in the absence of sufficient and justified reasons or otherwise; Second, the freedom of civil subject should not be restrained in the absence of sufficient and justified reasons or otherwise. To reach mutual understanding, and on the basis of that to reach new consensus on specific value judgment further, scholars of civil law should base their discussions on substantive rules of argumentation for value judgment, follow rules and forms of argumentation as procedural techniques, and apply proper methods of argumentation. This paper also explores the application of substantive rules of argumentation on two specific value judgment issues of civil law scholars.     

Humanising Imprisonment: A European project?

This paper focuses on the continued significance of human rights in the movement to develop a more comprehensive European framework to improve prison conditions. It identifies the immediate factors that underlie the movement as the successful implementation of the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and Punishment; the growing number of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights applying the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms to prison matters; the expansion of the number of member states of the Council of Europe; and the increased political interest at European level in penological matters. Attention is also paid to the wider ideological role that a concern for human rights plays in European criminal justice politics. The paper illustrates the reform movement by focussing on recent recommendations of the Council of Europe on various aspects of imprisonment, including the new European Prison Rules. The possible emergence of an international instrument of treaty status that would deal directly with substantive conditions of imprisonment is noted and its potential impact considered. An argument is made for the systemisation of European prison law and for further reform initiatives.