论冲突中的道德和法律

道德和法律的冲突来源于道德的多元化。在专制主义下 ,道德和法律的冲突的调整方式是取消冲突或放任冲突。这两种方式被历史证明是行不通的。适度冲突论是解决道德和法律冲突的设想 ,目的就是要在二者适度的冲突中推动法治不断地进步。     

多元化视野中的和谐社会

多元化是经济体制变化的必然结果。随着经济利益的分化,政治利益与思想观念均呈现出多元化的倾向。多元化对于构建和谐社会既有有利的一面,也有不利的一面。能否构建和谐社会,关键在于这个和谐社会的走向是否与广大人民的利益要求相一致,是否与社会主义的要求相一致。     

Who Receives Media Attention in South Korea: Analysing Internal and External Pluralism in the News Coverage of Policy Debates

The mass media in democracies plays an important role in portraying key policy debates and viewpoints, ultimately shaping how citizens and political actors understand policy problems. How diverse are the policy perspectives represented in the news? Research in comparative political communication typically points to two ways through which pluralism is maintained in the news coverage of policy debates—internally and externally. Using 1,341 Dong-A and 1,205 Hankyoreh Daily front-page newspaper stories published in Korea in the year 2008, this article examines the circumstances under which internal and external pluralism in the news is limited in a democratic media system. Specifically, the article argues that a unique newsgathering process relying heavily on government sources for policy-relevant information, as well as relatively weak and unstable ties between news outlets and political/social organizations significantly restrict the diversity of voices appearing in the news in Korea. Such attention patterns offer a partial explanation for rapidly declining trust in print newspapers among the Korean public, and raise concerns about whose views are actually reflected in public policy debates in the news.     

略论中国行政机关权属争端之解决进路——以行政诉讼为主轴的多元主义视角

行政机关权属纠纷在中国普遍存在,而现行争议解决机制却处理不利.故有必要引入机关诉讼、完善第三人诉讼制度且以该正式机制为主要途径与多元主义非正式解决方案配合互补,在具体操作上实现内部机制优先与外部诉讼保障之并育,以期完善中国的行政组织法律体制,规范行政机关的权限关系,进而推进中国政府间权限争端解决机制的渐进性构建.     

对宗教自由与多元主义的挑战：印尼反阿赫默迪亚运动浅析

印尼是一个多元民族与多元文化的国家，宗教自由与多元主义是印尼建国以来长期奉行的政治原则，对维护族群团结与社会稳定发挥着重要影响。但近年来印尼国内日益猖獗的反伊斯兰阿赫默迪亚教派的运动不仅严重践踏了宗教自由与多元主义的政治原则，同时也凸显了后苏哈托时期印尼伊斯兰激进主义的膨胀及其日益增长的政治影响。今天印尼的反阿赫默迪亚运动不仅加剧了印尼伊斯兰思想与穆斯林社会的分裂，同时也折射出当代印尼伊斯兰自由主义与多元主义在印尼面临的困境与挑战。     

对抗性政治、话语接合与多元而激进的民主——拉克劳和墨菲的政治思想述评

拉克劳和墨菲从人类社会对抗的永恒性角度来理解政治.他们认为对抗在社会生活中具有积极的、建设性的作用,而且我者与他者之间竞争的开展正是民主所必需的.在当代西方社会,阶级斗争已被各种形式的反资本主义斗争所取代,对抗的主体已趋于多元化.只要这些主体认识到新社会运动的所有参与者都是实现民主的动力与载体,他们就可以在多元而激进的民主话语接舍下构建"激进的公民身份"及反抗压迫的等同链条.尽管拉克劳和墨菲对马克思主义的改造带有浓厚的唯心主义色彩,但正统马克思主义者仍然可以从他们的政治理论中吸取有益的成分,以更好地丰富和发展马克思主义理论.     

The nature of the beast: are citizens’ juries deliberative or pluralist?

Citizens’ juries are a form of “minipublics,” small-scale experiments with citizen participation in public decision-making. The article presents a theoretical argument that improves understanding relating to the design of the citizens’ jury. We develop the claim that two discourses on democracy can be discerned: the deliberative and the pluralist. By looking at the design features of citizens’ juries we conclude that they are based on pluralist reasoning to a far greater extent than most authors seem to realize, and that the association with deliberative democracy is therefore one-sided. Based on empirical findings, we attempt to shed further light on the actual operation of citizens’ juries. Observations of two recent Dutch juries suggest on the one hand that a learning process and a positive effect on the sense of political involvement occurred. On the other hand, we saw a certain level of groupthink in one of the citizens’ juries, and found that the juries are not greatly representative in terms of political preferences. Our findings point firstly to a need for greater awareness among the organizers of juries of the two democratic discourses. This would lead to more consistent jury design. Secondly, our research emphasizes the need for more hands-on critical research of minipublics.