Procedural justice and the judge–probationer relationship in a co-occurring disorders court

Although a considerable amount of research has been conducted on treatment-based courts, there is little quantitative evidence that describes the relationship between the judge and the probationer. The present study examines perceptions of the judge–probationer relationship (JPR), procedural justice, and outcome satisfaction within a co-occurring disorders court (CODC) in Orange County, California. Based on interview and survey data from a sample of probationers within the CODC (n = 24), this article argues that perceptions of procedural justice are linked to perceptions of relationship quality between the judge and probationer. Analysis of the data found that probationers in the CODC have very positive views of their relationships with the judge, and elements of relationship quality are significantly linked with perceptions of procedural justice. Procedural justice is also a predictor of satisfaction with outcome in this sample. The results show promise that procedural justice and the quality of the judge–probationer relationship can positively affect probationers with co-occurring disorders in specialty courts.     

论纪检监察机关办案方式的调整——以刑事诉讼法的最新修正为背景

2012年刑事诉讼法修正案将对纪检监察机关的调查取证活动和现有的办案模式产生一定的影响。为实现纪检监察程序与刑事诉讼程序的无缝对接,需要对纪检监察机关的调查取证方式和办案模式进行必要调整。在调查取证方面,应当提高调查取证程序的规范性,加强对被调查人基本权利的保障,保证所取证据在刑事诉讼中的证据能力,必要时还应对取证程序的合法性进行证明。在办案模式方面,应当与检察机关建立新型的合作分工关系,在证据收集及程序进行方面对检察机关予以协助,并参与相关的诉讼活动。     

服务型政府构建的价值取向研究

构建服务型政府是实现有效社会治理的重要举措之一,也是经济全球化背景下我国政府改革的直接目标。作为一种新型的政府治理模式,服务型政府的构建必须以＂公民本位＂为核心指导思想,因为＂公民本位＂是服务型政府合法性的基础,是完成服务型政府根本任务的重要保障,是贯彻落实科学发展观的重要体现,是构建社会主义和谐社会的重要组成部分。＂公民本位＂对现阶段我国服务型政府的构建具有明显的价值导向作用,服务型政府应当是坚持公民权利导向、公共权力回归于民导向、法治导向和公民参与导向的政府。     

本质的还是建构的?——论性倾向平等保护中的“不可改变”进路

性倾向和性别、种族一样,属于因出生而获得的"不可改变"特征,所以应该得到严格审查,得到宪法的平等保护。这一进路遭到了批评,因为关键问题在于政府立法和性倾向之间是否具有关联性。自然科学关于同性恋生物基础的研究对"不可改变"提供了强有力的支持,而这种本质主义的研究遭到了社会建构主义者强有力的批判,身份政治中的这一争论提醒我们,从"我也无能为力"的诉求中,同性恋权利不能获得真正的力量。     

企业家导向的理论基础、测量及相关变量

企业家导向是战略管理和企业家精神两个领域的重要构念,在环境日益不确定的今天越来越受到学者的关注和重视。本文回顾了企业家导向的理论基础和内涵演变,着重分析了企业家导向构念测量的视角、维度构成及测量量表,并对既往研究中企业家导向与组织绩效之间的关系机理及情境影响作了总结。文章最后指出今后有必要对企业家导向的单维度、测量方法和情境变量作进一步的研究。     

经营者薪酬:正当性危机与程序控制

对经营者实行年薪制已是大势所趋,但经营者自定高薪,已引发了正当性危机,而程序公正对于经营者薪酬的正当性具有决定性意义。建立以公司价值最大化为价值取向,具有独立性、公平性和透明度的薪酬程序规范,以遏制经营者自定高薪,使其具有公信力。     

Mind the gap(s): Winning,losing, and perceptions of electoral integrity in mixed-member proportional systems

This study investigates whether and how experiences of winning and losing at the ballot box shape voters' views about the integrity of the electoral process in Germany's mixed-member proportional system. Relying on comprehensive data from the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES) 2021, the analysis provides evidence for a consistent winner-loser gap in voters' electoral-integrity perceptions, with electoral losers evaluating the electoral process systematically more negative than electoral winners. Moreover, the analysis shows that the winner-loser gap is particularly pronounced for voters who lost in two consecutive federal elections (‘repeated losers’) as well as for those who suffered electoral defeat with both their list and district votes (‘double losers’). These findings provide novel insights on how voters in mixed-member proportional systems cope with winning and losing at the ballot box, highlighting that electoral losers place (part of) the blame for their electoral defeat on the electoral process and procedures as such. In addition, the findings point to the relevance of specific features of electoral systems in shaping winner-loser gaps in electoral-integrity beliefs.     

中国物流产业发展前景和政策取向

2l世纪,物流产业将成为中国经济发展的重要产业和新的经济增长点.他对国民经济发展在促进经济增长、提高经济运行质量、改善国民经济结构等方面有着十分重要的作用,我们应充分发挥市场和政府对现代物流业发展的作用.     

略论《刑事诉讼法》的再修改

再次修改《刑事诉讼法》既是总结司法实践经验、实现我国刑事诉讼制度协调发展的需要,也是加强人权的程序保障、促进我国刑事诉讼制度民主化、国际化和法治化的需要;在修改过程中,应当正确处理好《宪法》与《刑事诉讼法》、惩罚犯罪与保护人权、司法公正与司法效率、借鉴国外先进经验与结合我国国情之间的关系;修改的基本内容应当包括加强对追诉权力的控制、辩护权利的保护、保障公正审判的权利以及健全程序侵权的救济机制四个方面。     

Towards an Integration of Distributive Justice,Procedural Justice,and Social Resource Theories

The aim of this paper is to formulate new and more precise predictions regarding behavioral reactions to distributive and procedural injustice via insights from resource theory. The three theories share focus on discrepancies between actual and ideal states of existence as well as on psychological and behavioral reactions to discrepancy. But they also differ from each other in their conceptualizations and theorizing about these matters. Equity theory conceptualizes discrepancy as a perceived mismatch between inputs and outcomes; multiprinciple distributive justice and procedural justice theories view discrepancy as a mismatch between expected and applied distribution and procedural rules, respectively. Resulting feelings of inequity/injustice may trigger attempts to restore justice. Within the framework of resource theory, discrepancy concerns an inappropriate match between the nature of the provided and received resources. This leads to frustration which, in turn, may trigger attempts at retaliation. Limitations of the theories are discussed, with particular focus on their inability to match specific discrepancies with appropriate behavioral reactions. Behavioral predictions are based upon established congruence between behavioral reactions and violated procedural rules as well as type of inequity, as determined via their respective resource isomorphism. Limitations of the present integration attempt are discussed.