论行政允诺诉讼的审查规则——以行政允诺的性质为视角

行政允诺是现代积极行政背景下的新兴产物,具有给付行政和柔性行政双重属性。然而,立法的缺失以及理论研究的滞后,导致当前司法实践中行政允诺诉讼的审查规则有失科学性和合理性。完善行政允诺诉讼的审查规则应当逐步健全法制、改善司法实践、建立有效的行政内部监督机制。     

我国信托法关于讨债信托与诉讼信托无效的规定应当删除

应当将关于讨债信托与诉讼信托无效的规定从我国《信托法》中删除。基本理由：该法关于讨债信托无效的规定的适用将致使已成为政策工具的公司债信托与金融不良债权信托成为无效信托,故该规定在目前已成为“推动公司债券发行”与“刊离国有商业银行金融不良债权”这两项我国现阶段的重要金融改革政策所要达到的目标的法律障碍,甚至关于该规定已成为后面一项政策目标实现的法律障碍已有司法判例佐证;该法关于诉讼信托无效的规定完全没有必要存在于其中,因为在我国并不存在从国家有效规制金钱债权代替行使行为角度看需要该规定的法律背景与社会背景,况且将该规定保留在该法中对债权人明显不利。     

The High Representative and directoires in European foreign policy: the case of the nuclear negotiations with Iran

ABSTRACT

The negotiations with Iran about its nuclear programme have seen the most protracted involvement of the High Representatives of the European Union in a high-profile policy case. This article traces the evolution of the High Representatives’ participation in the negotiations, from the first contacts with the E3 (Germany, France and the United Kingdom) in 2003 to the adoption of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in 2015. It focuses on the institutional role the High Representatives played in relation with the directoires leading the talks with Iran – first the E3 and, since 2006, E3/EU. In this context, it examines the personal and organisational factors that affected the influence each of the three High Representatives (Javier Solana, Catherine Ashton and Federica Mogherini) had in regard to the directoires. The analysis distinguishes specifically between the phases before and after the 2009 Lisbon Treaty. The article shows how similar personal qualities of the three High Representatives in terms of problem-solving and trust-building gave them political capital that enabled them to adopt a fairly constant role as bridge-builders within the directoires and between the directoires and other actors. The reforms of the Lisbon Treaty had only a minor impact.     

面向司法审查的行政行为说明理由——郴州饭垄堆矿业有限公司与国土资源部等国土资源行政复议决定再审案评析

郴州饭垄堆矿业有限公司与国土资源部等国土资源行政复议决定再审案争点之一是行政行为说明理由。在司法审查中,对于涉及专业性判断理由的审查,法院应当保持对行政必要的尊重。将“程序过程审查”作为一种司法审查的方式导入本案,使得法院审查更具有针对性,审查方法也呈多元化。对于行政行为不说明理由的,可以认定为适用法律、法规错误。     

东南亚恐怖主义的层累构造与演化逻辑

东南亚恐怖主义的形成有其特殊条件,是多种矛盾层累式构造的结果。东南亚各国历史上复杂的政治经济结构、族群社会结构带来的社会矛盾和族群矛盾构成了东南亚恐怖主义的基座。伊斯兰复兴运动衍生的极端伊斯兰意识形态以及基地组织在东南亚的扩散和"演进"成为东南亚恐怖主义成长的关键因素。美国发动的全球反恐战争给穆斯林带来选择困境,爱好和平的穆斯林同样需要抵制西方社会对伊斯兰教"污名化"的侵袭,反而为极端组织的成长提供了生命力。因为情势的不同,东南亚各国的反恐陷入集体行动的困境,固化了层累式构造的矛盾,影响了反恐行动与反恐合作。     

The State of the Art of Child Hearings in Germany. Results of a Nationwide Representative Study in German Courts

According to German family law, in family court proceedings that deal with custody or access rights, family judges are obligated to personally hear the child if the feelings, ties, or will of the child are significant for the decision. In a research study commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Justice, a nationwide representative survey of all judges compiled their personal information and their attitudes and expectations as well as various parameters regarding the concrete practice of hearing children. Also, with a very complex methodological design, over 50 children and their parents were studied one week in advance of the hearing, directly before and after the hearing, and four weeks following the hearing. The results of the study are presented, particularly those pertaining to the burden and relief for the children and the expectations of judges. The practical experiences of family judges in personally hearing children are included as well.     

论推进城市化进程与新农村建设的有机结合

在我国城市化过程中,我们要推进城市化进程与新农村建设的有机结合。在推动城乡良性互动与统筹发展的政策选择上,我们要做到：统筹城乡生产力布局,统筹城乡基础设施建设,统筹城乡经济发展,充分发挥政府在推动城乡良性互动与统筹发展中的作用。     

对适时防卫与事后防卫的再认识——从一则真实案例说起

“不法侵害行为的结束”不等同于“不法侵害的结束”,是适时防卫还是事后防卫,应以不法侵害是否结束为判断标准,而不应以不法侵害行为是否结束为判断标准。     

当前国内群体性事件及其发展趋势研究

对群体性事件进行深入的研究应立足于对群体性事件概念的归纳梳理。当前我国群体性事件存在着“非直接利益者”参与愈来愈多、组织化倾向日益明显、“行动群众”日益增多和“怨恨变量”日益增长等趋势,而“下层知识分子”现象的出现标志着国内社会冲突已进入一个新的阶段。未来一个时期是国内群体性事件的多发期,应加强对群体性事件发展的分析和预测。     

An overview of the EU–SA Strategic Partnership 10 years on: Diverging world views,persisting interests

ABSTRACT

The European Union–South Africa (EU–SA) Strategic Partnership has entered its 10th year. It is a product of its time and particular regional and international circumstances. These having changed somewhat over the course of the last decade, it is not surprising that the dynamics of the relationship, expressed through the strategic partnership's parameters, have undergone commensurate changes. Based on the recognition that the partnership is between a multilateral institution and a state, the difference in their respective strategic positions is inevitable. The challenge, therefore, is for the EU–SA Strategic Partnership to maintain a flexibility that allows for continued contestation, development and relevance. This paper reviews the historical context of the partnership and the challenging dynamics that have evolved over the lifespan of the partnership, providing the basis for the thematic discussion which follows in this issue. The analysis in this article demonstrates that, in spite of acknowledged challenges, the functionality of the strategic partnership based on persisting interests remains intact.