东营市农村人力资源现状及原因分析

加快农村人力资源开发，提高农村人力资源素质，是建设社会主义新农村的根本。东营市农村人力资源数量丰富，但整体科学文化素质低，人力资源结构不合理，人才资源比较匮乏，农村劳动力弱化、老龄化问题凸现。这是思想认识、“二元”结构、教育体系、投资体制、政策法规、市场制度、管理体制等因素共同影响的结果。为此，东营市应强化措施，大力推进农村人力资源开发。     

当前形势下促进山东省农民持续增收的对策思考

改革开放30年来，山东省农民收入迅速增加，生活质量显著改善，农村经济社会持续保持了良好发展态势。但是，在当前国际金融危机持续蔓延的复杂严峻形势下，国内经济环境也随之不断恶化，这无疑会对提高我省农民收入水平带来不利影响，出现的新困难与历史形成的老问题互相叠加，保持农业稳定发展、农民持续增收的难度明显加大。为了有效应对当前的不利形势，必须创新促进农民收入持续增长的思路，从而保证我省农村经济的持续健康发展和农村社会的稳定。     

瑞典积极的劳动力市场政策有效性分析

瑞典是世界上最早开始实施积极的劳动力市场政策的国家，同时也是目前世界上实施积极的劳动力市场政策力度最大的国家之一。积极的劳动力市场政策在瑞典的劳动就业中占有重要地位，是瑞典劳动就业政策的一个基本特征。瑞典积极的劳动力市场政策充分开发并利用了“边际化”劳动力资源，提高了劳动参与率，促进了不同部门之间劳动力的合理配置，但其高昂的支出也加重了财政负担，减少了正规就业。     

中国农村微观组织的变迁与功能分化

建国以来，中国农村微观组织的变迁经历了“人民公社——村民委员会一村民委员会＋农民专业合作社”三种主要的模式，在这一过程中，全能型的农村微观组织形式被打破，经济功能分化出来，逐步演变为独立、合法的微观性经济组织。推进农村微观组织的功能的进一步分化，特别是培育农村政治性微观组织，分担和承接村民委员会无力完成的农村社会公共管理职能，有利于促进社会主义新农村建设的发展。     

皖北地区农村党的基层组织与社会主义新农村建设研究

农村党的基层组织是社会主义新农村建设的组织保障,皖北各地围绕社会主义新农村建设采取提高基层党员素质、完善基层民主自治等措施有效发挥了党的基层组织在社会主义新农村建设中作用,但在带领群众发展经济、推进农民自治和促进精神文明建设等方面都存在许多亟待解决的问题。     

积极稳妥地推进农村社会保障体系的建立和健全

农村社会保障是国家社会保障的重要组成部分。没有农村社会保障制度的建立和完善,就没有全国的社会保障制度。加快建立农村社会保障体系,不仅是改革和完善我国社会保障体系的重大举措,也是我国农村经济发展和社会进步的必然要求,是全面建设小康社会的重要保证。     

合作社影响下的村庄治理

村庄治理研究是目前被学者广泛关注的一个领域,合作社的研究文章也很多,但是二者结合起来研究的文章相对较少。把合作社与村庄治理联系起来研究是一种尝试。通过对目前村庄治理的变化和存在问题的分析,认为以农民为主体组织起来的合作社能够在一定程度上影响目前的村庄治理,合作社的发展会对村民自治产生一些示范效应,并可能对村庄体制内组织功能产生一些替代(经济方面)。在分析的基础上努力尝试将体制外组织资源纳入对农村治理主体的考察视野,为农村组织研究提供一个新的分析框架和思路。     

Objective and Self-Perceived Resources as Predictors of Depression Among Urban and Non-Urban Adolescent Mothers

Pregnant and parenting adolescents often cope with a lack of resources as they struggle to negotiate the tasks of motherhood and adolescence. Previous research has determined that young mothers have an increased rate of depression when compared to older mothers. In this study, self-perceived resource adequacy, education, income, age, and environment (urban vs. non-urban) were investigated as predictors of depression at approximately 14 and 36 months after birth in adolescent mothers (N=523). Self-perceived resources accounted for significant variance in depression at 14 and 36 months while controlling for education and income. However, education and income were not significant predictors while controlling for self-perceived resources. Age and environment did not predict depression. Researchers would be wise to focus on a young woman’s view of her situation, as it appears that self-perceived resources play an important role in predicting depression.Post-Doctoral Research Associate at Juniper Gardens Children’s Project, University of Kansas. She received her Ph.D. from Iowa State University in 2005. Her major research interests are adolescent parenthood, mental health, and parenting interventions.Professor at Iowa State University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota in 1976. His major research interests are stress and coping, mental health, and adolescence.Assistant Professor at Iowa State University. She received her Ph.D. from Iowa State University in 1997. Her major research interests are assessment and program planning for children with disabilities and early literacy.     

论新形势下实现农村公安工作走群众路线的有效形式

创建以“乡村110”报警服务为网络,以驻村警务室为支撑点的新型警务机制,极大地调动了广大群众参与群防群治的积极性,创造性地促进了“打、防、控”长效机制的建设,在防范、打击犯罪和服务群众三方面都取得了显著成效     

Technocracy,Politicization, and Noninvolvement: Politics of Expertise in the European Regulation of Chemicals

This article addresses the relationship between scientific expertise and policy in European chemicals regulation. We argue that the role of scientific expertise in the European regulation of chemicals varies across decision‐making levels, countries, and stages of the policy process. Our case study of the role of scientific expertise in the regulation of brominated flame retardants illustrates considerably different manifestations of this interconnected process across regulatory arenas, even though this case concerns a single group of substances. On the European Union level, we find a mix of technocracy and politicization; in Sweden, a clear‐cut politicization; and in Poland, noninvolvement. Such differences can be explained by a combination of factors, in particular frame dominance, and mobilization of advocacy coalitions.