从公平正义的视角看和谐社会的构建

党的十六届六中全会提出"社会公平正义是社会和谐的基本条件",而我国目前"金字塔"型的社会阶层结构;不合理的社会流动模式;社会整合的乏力却制约着公平正义的实现。因此应以完善制度为根本,协调利益为关键,加强监督为保障来实现公平正义,构建良性运行的和谐社会。     

我国外资银行市场准入制度的局限性及其克服

市场准入问题是世贸组织法律体制最为关注的问题之一。我国新出台的《外资金融机构管理条例》及其实施细则与《外资金融机构驻华代表机构管理办法》等法律文件 ,尽管结合入世承诺做了修改 ,但在有关外资银行市场准入的问题上仍有诸多欠缺。针对现有制度的局限性 ,有关法律应该在立法体例和具体规则上进行反思和完善。     

Utility of infectious disease coding sheets for surveillance in a state medical examiner's office

Medical examiners are often first to recognize unusual occurrences of fatal infectious diseases. Recognition of these deaths allows public health officials to institute appropriate public health measures. Therefore, we developed a simple method of identifying and tracking infectious disease deaths in a statewide medical examiner's office. One-page infectious disease forms were completed for 1566/1949 autopsies (80%) performed at the New Mexico Office of the Medical Investigator in 2004. In 241 cases one infectious disease was identified at autopsy and 58 cases had two infectious diseases. Fourteen of the infectious-diseases caused deaths involved diseases that are notifiable conditions in New Mexico. Pneumonia was the most commonly reported infectious process (47 deaths) followed by sepsis (25 deaths). Tracking infectious disease deaths highlighted the importance of recognizing these deaths, although hand-written entries were unstandardized. Preferably, a tracking system would be built into electronic databases at medical examiner and coroner's offices, expediting the identification of these diseases and contact of public health agencies.     

监管安全的责任边界问题研究

责任边界是落实监管安全责任的基础，是与监管安全工作相关的岗位，所应当清晰与明确履行监管安全职能的一种可具体性、可规定性、可操作性的岗位职责。其责任的边界可以区分为领导与被领导、外延与内涵、绝对与相对、作为与不作为、刑事与行政等类型，其责任边界的清晰、规范和有效可以通过法治化、专业化、精细化、流程化和权利化的路径来实现。     

指定居所监视居住具体适用与完善

新刑事诉讼法保留并完善了监视居住制度,将其定位于减少羁押的替代措施,新增了指定居所监视居住,明确了其适用条件和程序,有其存在的价值和合理性。但是,由于指定居所监视居住相配套的法律、司法解释不完善,实践中对具体问题理解适用不一,也存在法律规定模糊、执行难度大、变相羁押等问题。如何完善指定居所监视居住制度,防止权力滥用,在打击犯罪与保障人权之间保持平衡,是立法和司法实践不容忽视的重大问题。     

检察机关参与公益诉讼的法律问题研究

检察机关提起公益诉讼已成为多数国家的司法惯例.根据我国检察机关参与公益诉讼的现状和主要问题,并借鉴国外检察机关介入案件的立法及司法实践经验,建议从理论上对检察机关提起公益诉讼的形式和范围进行严格限制,正确处理检察权、审判权和行政权之间平衡与制约的关系,针对公益诉讼案件的不同性质,动态调整检察权的参与程度.     

政府采购“二元悖论”问题的拯治

随着我国政府采购法的出台,政府采购开始走向法制化,但是如果监督机制不健全,就可能产生更加严重的后果,导致集体腐败,目前我国政府采购的问题有:采购范围纵深窄、采购价格高、企业歧视仍未完全消除等,只有扩大公开招标范围、强化采购监督机构功能、发挥参与企业的监督作用及加强采购队伍建设,才能使政府采购真正成为“阳光下的交易”。     

贪污贿赂案件指定监视居住探讨

在最高人民检察院对全国检察机关掀起规范司法行为专项整治工作的浪潮下,整治检察权履行中存在的司法不规范行为成为本次整治的核心要点,贪污贿赂案件指定监视居住问题也成为规范司法的范畴。2012年《刑事诉讼法》新增指定监视居住的相关规定,为保护当事人合法权益提供法律保障。然而,在实践中,监视居住“看审不分”的顽疾根深蒂固,如若不除该种顽疾,将不能保证司法文明,规范司法的理念也无从谈起。在规范司法视野下,反思指定监视居住执行的现状,分析造成看审不分、变相羁押及违法履职风险等问题的根源,以此提出赋予审判机关提前介入预审指定监视居住案件决定权、强化公安机关监视居住职责,提高侦查监督部门及刑事执行检察部门监督实效建议。     

Surveillance and International Terrorism Intelligence Exchange: Balancing the Interests of National Security and Individual Liberty

Using the revelations Edward Snowden passed over to the press regarding the actions of the U.S.’s National Security Agency and the UK’s Government Communications Headquarters and their use of the Prism project, this article examines the law surrounding intelligence gathering in the U.S. and UK. Underpinning the analysis is the legal principle of proportionality as applied to balancing the interests of national security and individual liberties. After examining intelligence exchange procedures, which for the UK is through negotiated agreements between national security agencies and through the European Union’s policing agency, Europol, the main part of the article discusses legal challenges that have been made regarding surveillance and the use of anti-terror laws on citizens and the rationale behind the judicial decisions made in both the U.S. and UK jurisdictions. The argument forwarded is that there is a requirement for wide preventative powers being granted to counter-terrorism agencies and that the interests of national security and individual liberty are inclusive and, as shown by the cases covered in this article, we should rely on the judiciary to perform their function in applying proportionality to each case on its own merits.     

Radicalisation theories,policing practices,and “the future of terrorism?”

This article explores how theories of radicalisation have placed an emphasis on the development of an indicators-based approach to identify individuals who might engage in politically motivated violence. We trace how policing agencies have juxtaposed the search for indicators as a defence against criticisms of racial profiling. However, through an analysis of Canadian counter-terrorism training programmes, we demonstrate that the search for radicalisation indicators reaffirms pre-emptive and discriminatory security practices. We insist that despite efforts to theorise radicalisation outside of the practices of the “war on terror”, current trends risk rationalising prejudicial policing that affirms social exclusion and injustice.