论学术评价机制的完善

现代管理主义的兴起对学术产生了冲击,使得学术职业的传统和特有的价值理念受到了前所未有的冲击,使学术不端行为的产生成为必然。现行学术评价机制的缺陷主要包括考核指标体系不合理,评价方式和程序的异化。不合理的评价机制对学术不端起了推波助澜的作用。因此要建立新的学术评价机制;建立多样化的评价体系,使评价标准理性化。同时要建立正当的学术评价程序,学术问题只能由学者解决,专家评议必须有规范的程序。     

中国宪法学的学术使命与功能的演变——中国宪法学30年发展的反思

宪法学的历史源远流长,不同时代的宪法学承担不同的学术使命。在改革开放的背景下,中国宪法学以其学术逻辑与主体性,推动了社会发展与进步,确立了自己的历史方位与功能。通过对宪法学学术使命与功能演变过程的分析,对宪法学30年发展中的若干基本问题进行了学术反思,提出“后30年宪法学”发展的基本课题。     

前科制度的理论根据探讨

前科制度的理论根据问题是前科制度研究中的基础性问题。前科制度的 理论根据是报应根据和功利目标的内在统一。报应是前科制度的正义性根据,功 利是前科制度的目的性根据。前科制度的刑罚价值并非补偿前次犯罪之刑罚在量 上的欠缺和不足,追求刑罚的特殊预防效应,而是用以消除再次犯罪人的人身危 险性,追求刑罚的特殊预防效应和一般预防效应的手段。     

试论近30年中国学术翻译的形态嬗变

1980年代末开始,述评性学术翻译应运而生,以弥补移植性翻译的三种局限:难以应对文化背景的未及性,移植性翻译与学术研究之间的某种内在紧张,移植性译者缺乏消极自由.如果从解构主义路径突破这些局限,容易否定平等对话和重叠共识,导致话语霸权.基于构述法的述评性翻译有助于厘清翻译内容的文化语境,赋予翻译者更大的、合法的言说自由,发挥研究与翻译的双重价值.     

The Impact of Political Change on the State of Academia Including Academic Freedom in the Arab World: Libya as a Case Study

ABSTRACT

Furthering Western style academic freedom has been challenging, as Arab countries, especially Libya, have known only autocratic regimes throughout their modern existence. Amidst its current political and social upheaval, Libyan society is drifting towards the unknown. The problem addressed in this study is the impact of political change on the state of academia but, more specifically, academic freedom. Since the intervention in Libya by NATO states, many academics have lost their jobs. Some have become refugees outside of Libya as a direct result of the appropriation of most of the governmental posts in the country by religious and political radicals. The research questions reflect ways in which the new inserted de facto leaders of post-transitional Libya have impacted life on Libyan campuses and academic freedom.     

中国共产党与20世纪中国学术研究论纲

中国共产党学术史是中共文化史研究的一个薄弱环节,党史学应加强对中国共产党学术史的研究。     

关于强制执行立法几个理论误区的探讨

在有关强制执行立法的学术研究中,不仅学术认识上存在一定的分歧,而且一些不当认识在一定程度上和一些方面,还从理论认识的角度把强制执行立法的学术研究引入了误区。对于这些问题有必要进行深入的研究和探讨。     

Reflections on law and impact in the light of Brexit

ABSTRACT

The impact agenda in academic research affords rich opportunities – to inform the media, policymakers and the general public; to co-produce research with third sector organisations. In the context of Brexit, the prevailing ignorance of politicians and other stakeholders has been so profound, and the falsehoods that have had popular purchase so baseless, as to make the need for impact and public engagement all the more acute. This is not simply about fact-checking, but about making the case for the very worth of expertise, and reasserting the basic, core scientific values that drive academic work – values that have been trashed by the precepts of a postmodern nihilism, in which all positions are equally (in)valid and only your own gut can be trusted. But challenging these precepts in public arenas has personal and professional costs: significant workload implications, the acquisition of new skills and often a torrent of abuse. As such, this work needs institutional support. Departments need to value it appropriately, to promote equal access to impact opportunities and to confront the discriminatory barriers to (and consequences of) taking up the impact gauntlet. Throughout the Brexit process, expertise and experts have been dismissed and denigrated. The task now is to restore public faith in the value of the pursuit of truth.     

在中青年学术骨干中发展党员的工作机制研究——以Z大学G学院为例

在中青年学术骨干中发展党员,培养造就一批既有马克思主义信仰、又有现代科学文化知识的马克思主义者,是提升高校中青年学术骨干政治素养的重要举措。文章深入分析了Z大学G学院中青年学术骨干入党现状及其存在的问题,剖析与之相对的原因,探索如何改进在中青年学术骨干中发展党员的工作机制。     

追踪与研判:《南海行为准则》制定问题的研究动向

本文梳理了近年来国内外学者关于《南海行为准则》制定问题的最新研究成果,试图在一定程度上展现学界对准则问题的基本认知,以期为相关部门和国内学界开展进一步的对策研究提供有益借鉴。在行为准则制定工作久拖不决的情况下,部分学者倡议的先行尝试制定岛屿规则、专属经济区行为规则等"准则单行本"或绕开《联合国海洋法公约》而另行创制《南中国海海洋法公约》等新观点尤其值得国内重视和研究。