新刑诉法视角下律师在场制度与合适成年人参与制度之比较

在未成年人司法实践中,针对律师在场与合适成年人参与是否可以合二为一的问题存在许多争议,律师是否可以作为合适成年人是争议的主要焦点。笔者结合新刑诉法,对律师在场制度与合适成年人参与制度的概念、联系、区别进行了详细的比较,从权利属性、适用范围、人员条件、作用、工作方式、可行度六方面阐述了两种制度的区别。     

从“诬告反坐”到“讹诈有罚”——对被救助者诬赖救助者立法惩罚的再思考

当下诸多被救助者诬告讹诈救助者事件背后,无不折射出单纯中华传统道德诉求已经不能协调社会的健康发展。当道德软性约束作用无法发挥其积极作用,通过法律制度建设方面惩罚诬告讹诈者成为必要。然现代＂讹诈有罚＂并非简单的惩恶扬善呼吁,也并非中国古代＂诬告反坐＂的直接过渡与顺承。立法惩罚诬告者还需从制度渊源、现行体制、证据认定、责任承担、惩罚措施等多方予以分析。     

警察类高职院校办学模式再思考

警察类高职院校办学模式不能盲目地照搬国外或理工技术类高职院校的办学模式,目前对我国警察类高职院校办学模式研究的人较少,从我国警察类高职院校办学现状分析,研究适合警察类高等职业院校的办学模式具有重要意义。当前我国警察类高职院校办学模式存在的问题主要有办学层次结构不合理;招生政策计划性不强,标准不统一;就业机制不适应警察队伍建设和警察类院校建设发展的需要;合作办学存在难度。完善警察类高职院校的办学模式需要提升警察类高职院校的办学层次;在招生就业方面实行定向招录,择优录取;改革合作办学模式,实现与行业深度合作。唯此才能生存发展。     

简论晚明“西洋哲学”之输入

《记法》专门探讨"记忆"问题,是一部介绍西洋"认识论"或"知识论"的专著。《童幼教育》是教育学及伦理学专著,属哲学之一支,既是介绍"西洋法学"、"西洋医学"入中国之最早文献之一,亦是引介"西洋神学"及"西洋大学"之最早文献之一,可说"太西总学之大略"已赖此书输入中国。《西学凡》介绍了哲学学科四年之课程(第一年逻辑学,第二年物理学,第三年形而上学,第四年数学与伦理学),已经把当时"西洋哲学"之全部内容包含完了。《灵言蠡勺》分四篇,一论灵魂之体,二论灵魂之能,三论灵魂之尊,四论灵魂所向美好之情,是晚明一部专门介绍西洋"灵魂"学说之哲学典籍。这些书在中国之刻印,正值"西洋近代哲学"之发源期,它们没有把"西洋近代哲学"介绍到中国来,但却把"西洋近代哲学"之前的"西洋哲学"介绍到中国来了。近代以前"西洋哲学"之完整框架,已经在弗.培根活动的那时节,出现在晚明中国学术界。     

公安院校升本过程中英语教学的衔接

随着我国学历教育水平的不断提升,提高公安人员从业素质的呼声不断高涨,公安院校专升本浪潮成为大势所趋。从大专向本科的转变,首先带来的是生源质量的整体拔高;其次,在教学目标需求上也与专科阶段截然不同。如何准确定位升本后的师生角色及完成相应教学目标,是公安院校一线教师应该探讨和思索的重要问题。文章立足英语教学,给予该问题以一定剖析。     

“坦白从宽”之法理要义——以《刑法修正案(八)》为背景

坦白是中国刑事政策中的重要内容之一,是宽严相济刑事政策的重要表现。以《刑法修正案(八)》为背景,结合自首的基本原理及其司法解释对坦白予以分析。在认定坦白的过程中,应当从坦白的本质出发,对犯罪分子自身的认罪和悔罪以及为司法机关节省司法资源、提高办案效率等方面进行详细分析,在对行为是否构成坦白进行综合考察的同时,针对司法实践中适用坦白可能出现的若干问题进行研究。     

创新社会管理背景下涉警网络舆情危机处置探析

现阶段,我国正处于改革的攻坚期、发展的黄金期和社会矛盾的凸现期,涉警网络舆情危机时有发生。涉警网络舆情危机具有突发性、传播性、破坏性和交互性等显著特点。因此,公安机关应及时掌握涉警网络舆情动态,运用"公安网络舆情引导管理系统",完善涉警网络舆情预警研判和应急处置机制,掌握网络舆论引导主动权。     

The animal advocacy movement in the Baltic states: links to other social justice issues and possibilities for intersectional activism

ABSTRACT

This article focuses on the animal advocacy movement (AAM) in the Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Taking an intersectional perspective, I examine whether and how key animal activists in the Baltics see links between animal rights and other social justice issues. I also consider how the movement communicates its messages to the general public in settings where ideas around animal justice and possibilities for animal advocacy are relatively recent and unfamiliar. This analysis contributes to debates regarding possibilities for intersectional activism and collaboration between social justice movements in the Baltics and beyond.     

Does Control Make a Difference? The Moral Foundations of Shareholder Liability for Corporate Wrongs

The doctrine of limited liability, as traditionally understood, prevents shareholders from being held personally liable for corporate wrongs. Several authors have recently argued that the doctrine should be modified to make some or all shareholders individually liable for torts committed by corporations in which they hold shares. This article distinguishes three types of argument that might provide a moral basis for shareholder liability in such cases. I contend that while these arguments support holding at least some shareholders liable for corporate torts, they fail to justify a general regime of unlimited pro rata shareholder liability. The level of control shareholders exercise over a company makes an important difference to their moral duties to compensate victims of corporate wrongdoing.     

Security,privacy and freedom and the EU legal and policy framework for biometrics

The adoption of the Treaty of Lisbon and the granting to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the same legal force as the Treaty has lent a new impulse to the consideration of fundamental human rights by the European Union (EU). The question remains, however, as to how this legal discourse, centred upon human rights, is actually shaping the EU regulatory framework in specific policy domains. The aim of this paper is to critically appraise the ways that the fundamental rights of security, privacy and freedom guaranteed by the Charter are being construed in the context of EU law and policy on biometrics, an ethically and morally sensitive security technology whose development and use are being actively promoted by the EU. We conclude that the interpretation of the pertinent rights, as well as their balancing, owes a great deal to the goals of EU policies for research and development, and under the auspices of Freedom, Security and Justice, shaped largely by political and economic considerations. These considerations then tend to prevail over ethically or morally-based legal claims.