混合主体实施身份犯罪的定性

非身份者与有身份者,即混合主体共同实施身份犯罪,在古今中外的刑法中皆有所规定。现阶段,我国关于混合主体身份犯罪有着各种不同的认识,主要集中在非身份者的身份犯罪主体资格符合问题上。刑法分则中,纯正身份犯以有特定身份者为犯罪主体,非身份者不能构成。但是分则的构成要件在非身份者与有身份者共同实施纯正身份犯罪时,应将非身份者与有身份者从总体考察,非身份者可以在此时成为纯正身份犯的主体,具体定罪时要本着"特殊优于一般为原则,重法优于轻法为补充"的理念来处理。     

关于基层政府做好信访工作的几点思考——以济南市历城区为例

信访工作在城市化日益加速的今天已呈现出新的特色,这种特色是与当前社会发展的大背景分不开的。基层政府是做好信访工作的关键部门,这就要求处于一线的基层工作人员既要提高自身素养以做好信访工作,又要引导好群众,使矛盾化解在源头,从而减少信访矛盾,努力构建和谐社会。     

中国警察维权的发展演变及存在的问题

中国警察维权的发展演变情况，体现了各时期中国警察维权的内容和特点，也反映了警察维权的不足和困难。中国警察维权存在的问题，在立法和制度两方面的体现较为突出，也有各种干扰因素的影响。而警察维权的重点——袭警问题，以及警察维权的难点——解决警察维权所涉及的各方利益更是当前警察维权必须尽快解决的两大问题。     

论劳动关系中的民主

本文通过重新审视中国劳动关系的现状 ,结合对劳动关系史的考察 ,针对我国劳动关系现状中存在的问题及原因 ,重申了劳动关系及劳动关系理论中的民主理念和概念 ,提出了建立以民主的契约为基础的劳动关系调整机制权利的基本思路。     

接受理论研究及对思想政治教育的启示

接受是思想政治教育的重要环节。当代中外文学、美学、哲学、伦理学和传播学等对各自领域接受的含义、特点、基本矛盾和人们接受能力等方面进行了多角度的研究 ,取得了丰硕的成果。思想政治教育要注意吸收和借鉴相关学科的理论成果 ,研究思想政治教育自身的接受现象。     

澳门文化资源的旅游价值及开发

澳门是中华文化和西方文化的交汇点 ,其历史文化、宗教文化、族群文化、建筑文化、艺术文化都整合着中西文明。澳门在文化上存在着开放性、兼容性和共生性等特质。认真分析澳门文化资源的旅游价值 ,深入开发这些文化资源 ,对澳门社会经济的协调发展具有重要的现实意义     

On the Media Effects of Immigration and Refugee Board Hearings via Videoconference

Canada's Immigration and Refugee Board conducts some of itsrefugee hearings via videoconferencing. As part of a reviewof the fairness of this practice, a theoretical approach andreview of the empirical literature was commissioned. Particularlyunder ‘high stakes’ conditions, it was found thatvideoconferencing reduces mutual trust and understanding, exacerbatescultural differences in non-verbal communication, and increasesthe propensity to lie while decreasing the ability to detectfalsehoods. Further, the inherent power imbalance between thetribunal and the claimant is widened as the tribunal membersbecome acclimatized to the technology. In general, the differencein sensory perception of a mediating technology creates cognitivedifferences between mediated and non-mediated environments.Further, sensory perception that feeds narrative constructionvaries by culture. The process of conveying and understandingmeaning across cultures is sufficiently difficult; adding thecomplexity of videoconference mediation introduces the possibilityof inconsistency, inaccuracy, and altered judgement.     

Frontier Justice: Legal Aid and UNHCR Refugee Status Determination in Egypt

Where UNHCR conducts refugee status determination (RSD), itsreactions to legal aid for asylum-seekers have been mixed. Statisticalevidence collected from Egypt in 2002 indicates a correlationbetween receiving some form of legal aid service and an asylum-seeker'sincreased chances of gaining refugee protection from UNHCR.Unconventional forms of legal aid, including limited servicesby supervised non-lawyers (including volunteers from the refugeecommunity) showed a positive impact on first instance cases,while traditional legal aid models showed an impact at the appealstage. Legal aid should form an essential part of UNHCR's RSDprocedures, and NGOs should work to expand both traditionaland innovative forms of legal aid for asylum-seekers.     

System-Justifying Functions of Complementary Regional and Ethnic Stereotypes: Cross-National Evidence

According to system justification theory, stereotyping is an ideological process that serves to justify the status quo and bolster the legitimacy of the existing social order. The present research investigates the system-justifying role of complementary stereotypes in which high-status groups are represented as agentic and achievement-oriented and low-status groups as communal and interpersonally oriented. We demonstrate that such complementary stereotypes: (a) reflect a high degree of consensus across high- and low-status perceiver groups; (b) are endorsed more strongly to the extent that system justification motives are chronically or temporarily activated; and (c) serve an ideological function by enhancing the perceived legitimacy of the existing social system. Evidence concerning regional and ethnic stereotypes in Italy, England, and Israel provides converging evidence for the system-justifying function of complementary stereotypes and reveals remarkable similarity in the contents of stereotypes of different groups that happen to occupy similar status positions in their respective societies.     

Intergroup Biases as a Function of Reflected Status Appraisals and Support for Legitimizing Ideologies: Evidence from the USA and Israel

Theory and research suggest that members of high-status groups feel more positively about their own group than members of low-status groups feel about their group. The studies presented here test two hypotheses derived from this general idea (1) that members of high-status groups will show greater bias in favor of the in-group when they believe that others perceive the status difference between their group and relevant low-status groups to be larger; and (2) that this relationship will be stronger when high-status group members also endorse ideologies legitimizing their privileged status. However, because low group status may have self-protective properties, it was hypothesized that imputed status differences would not relate to out-group bias among low-status group members, regardless of ideology endorsement. Two studies—using samples from the United States and Israel, respectively—provided clear support for these hypotheses. Implications for the study of both intergroup biases and legitimizing ideologies are discussed.