"卖淫"的刑法解释--以南京某演艺吧"组织男青年向同性提供性服务"案为例

刑法的适用需要解释,法官应是解释的主体。刑法的适用解释要受罪刑法定原则的制约,只能进行严格解释,但只要没有超出"文义的射程"或"国民的预测范围"就属于扩张解释而非类推,并不违背罪刑法定原则。     

Digital governance in Rajasthan Secretariat： A trajectory

The concept of digital governance has renovated the basic premise of administration. Digitalization has not only made it more responsive but also enhanced its accountability to deliver the better services to people by initiating direct participation of common person in the process of governance. The dynamic nature of administration makes it change orientation thus responding to the demands in particular time frame. Though the core issue of rendering services acquires the center-stage, recently there has been intermixing of principles of public management giving effective resource management, the special leverage to flame policies. In countries which are less prone to the adaptations of advanced technologies are also taking e-initiative to activate the process of implementation. The present article explores the status of e-governance in Rajasthan, the biggest state of Indian Union. After the enactment of Information Technology Act 2000 by the union government, different states have also taken corresponding initiatives pertaining to the e-governance. This study which was carried out in Rajasthan in 2009 focuses on various dimensions of its application in state secretariat, which epitomizes the epithet of administrative activities undertaken by the Government of Rajasthan. The study results are evaluated on the basis of the data collected at different levels by instituting the questionnaire and survey. It establishes the fact that Rajasthan has responded very well in some areas of administration, but there are certain areas where it has to implement the e-initiative at par with the other states. Therefore this particular study examines the present status of the e-governance followed by the suggestive trajectory on what other efforts are needed to involve this state. The interpretations are subject to the data collected. The secretariat is the domain of governmental functioning to fulfill the expectations of common person in the state. This research works has focused on the various e-programs, and data collected thereafter have been analyzed to understand the intricacies of e-governance in the state. It is a less explored arena where the study is conducted to find out the status of various programs and the impact of e-governance on the implementation of programs.     

浅析由WTO贸易与环境争端所引发的理论争议

有关贸易与环境争端在GATT法律体系内很难找到具体适用的规则,因此GATT曾被环保主义者称作没有规则的天堂。WTO成立后,为解决贸易与环境争端,出现了对WTO协定作普通法式解释的现象。本文认为这种解释方法符合客观要求,我国政府应顺应国际环保形势发展的总体需要,支持用普通法的方式解释WTO贸易与环境的相关法律规定。     

略论行政解释的定位及其规制

行政解释是一个在我国行政法学界尚未引起足够重视的问题。现阶段 ,我国在行政解释方面存在的问题较多 ,其中既有程序方面的问题 ,也有对行政解释本身的定位方面的问题 ;既有事前的行政解释权设定方面的问题 ,也有事后对行政解释权的规范、制约方面的问题。应从宪法、组织法到基本法律层面规范和完善对行政解释权的设定和有关行政解释权运作的程序性规定 ,建立一整套对行政解释权的监督、约束机制 ,并确立行政解释在法律解释制度中的合理定位 ,探索立法解释、司法解释、行政解释合理运作、有效制约的机制。     

n‐Ethyl Pentylone‐Related Deaths in Alabama

n‐Ethyl pentylone (NEP) is a chemical substance derived from cathinone. Synthetic cathinones are an evolving group of drugs with stimulating, mind‐altering effects sometimes referred to as novel or new psychoactive substances (NPS). There is scarce information in the medical literature regarding forensic cases in which NEP is detected in toxicological testing. We present four fatalities involving NEP from Alabama in 2017. Deaths were attributed to NEP toxicity in two cases (peripheral blood concentrations of 0.121 and 0.953 mg/L) and injuries caused by gunshot wounds in two cases (peripheral blood concentrations of 0.045 and 0.031 mg/L). One case involving NEP described an individual who exhibited classic CNS‐stimulant induced erratic behavior before being found dead. These cases enhance the forensic literature regarding specific NPS like NEP and provide contextual reference for professionals considering the significance of NEP in toxicological interpretation.     

“选购成衣”与“量体裁衣”:欧陆与英美司法进路之比较

欧陆与英美两大法律传统的根本区别,在于法官可否为手头的案件形成适合于它且对未来有拘束力的规则,即法官可否造法。基于此,欧陆司法的进路是法官在了解案件事实后,选取已有的制定法规则并从立法者原意等角度对之进行扩大或限缩解释,以使之能涵摄手头的案件,这种思路可形象地称为"选购成衣"并对之进行修补加工。而普通法法官则是从案件本身的事实出发,"量体裁衣",以案件内在的是非曲直为指引,以既有规范为基础,以案件事实为条件,形成适合于案件的具体规则。     

罪刑法定、法律解释与机械执法

机械执法是一种错误的执法思想。对罪刑法定原则必须在实质上进行把握,法律词义原则上应从广义解释。刑法规定的内容应明确、具体,具有实体的合理性。法官对于法条解释的内容不得超出一般人的理解。     

法律解释的去理论化与立场转换——认知心理学的启示

学界提出的各种法律解释理论不仅仅在规范层面上无法自圆其说,同时也无法对法院的解释实践作出准确的描述。尽管针对美国联邦最高法院的经验研究表明法院的法律解释实践趋向于新文本主义和法律实用主义,但这些经验研究却没有证明法官遵循了这些解释理论。在对法律解释去理论化之后,如何看待实践中存在的"微观不一致与宏观一致"需要一种立场转换,即关注作为解释主体的法官的认知过程。     

立法解释的学理解构与制度重建——以刑法为视角

立法解释是在法律施行的过程中，立法机关对法律用语所作的阐释。立法解释存在诸多缺陷。从宏观角度而言，立法解释既不符合民主原则，也不符合法治原则，是规则中心主义的体现，其内容与司法解释内容高度趋同。从微观角度而言，立法解释不当地介入诸多问题。司法解释完全可以取代立法解释，其质量可以得到监督和保障，同时，人们应当坚持客观解释的立场。     

《正当防卫指导意见》中的程序问题评析

《正当防卫指导意见》中关于程序问题的若干规范对于正确办理涉正当防卫案件意义重大。侦查机关在取证工作中,应当着重注意对于能够证明不法侵害行为存在证据的及时收集。公检法机关在依法公正处理涉正当防卫案件时,尤其应当认真听取辩护方意见,及时披露案件信息,回应社会关切。对属于正当防卫的案件应当及时作出不予追究决定。但对于防卫过当案件均应适用认罪认罚从宽制度的要求似乎不妥。对于陪审制的运用应扬长避短。在案件办理的不同环节均应注意释法析理,尤其应当注意在认定为正当防卫的案件中对被害人及其家属进行释法析理。在做好法治宣传教育工作中,既要教育公民自觉遵守法律,更要教育公民敢于拿起法律的武器,积极行使防卫权利。