Ideological contestation and disciplinary associations: An autoethnographic analysis

An autoethnographic and self-reflexive theorised analysis of aspects of the South African Communication Association reveals that its internal tensions mimicked wider contradictions both during and after apartheid. The historical role played by the association is critically examined in relation to issues of governance and naming, and with regard to its shaping of the South African scholarly community as it negotiated different paradigms, constituencies and historical-political-economic contexts. The analysis is embedded in a critique of neoliberalism and how this condition has impacted the management procedures of the association.     

试论苏、黄等词的同体异用现象

词发展到北宋中期,苏轼及其弟子对词诸方面进行了新的诠释,其突出点是表现在词的同体异用,主要点是对词之传统性的反动,有意识地破坏词体的固有特点,更多的是引导词体对诗体的认同.以诗为词,古今均有探讨,多是从创作手法、艺术风格、文体递变等处比照分析,在词的文本方面用功甚深.而词的同体异用现象的产生,是与苏、黄等人对词体定位、有意识地引导和创作分不开的,是他们促使词体的雅化和开放,以及回避诗歌创作诸种因素合成作用的结果,具有一定的时效性.     

《中华人民共和国反垄断法》析评

The Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China has provided to prohibit monopoly agreements and abuse of dominant market position, control concentration of business operators and fight against administrative monopoly. The transformation of China’s economic system is incomplete, and the Anti-Monopoly Law has many flaws. At the initial stage of enforcing the Anti-Monopoly Law, severe challenges will occur in legislative purposes, enforcement authorities, fighting against administrative monopoly and handling of the relationship between anti-monopoly enforcement and industry supervision. Thus, the promulgation of the Anti-Monopoly Law is only the first step in the legislation on anti-monopoly. Wang Xiaoye held a bachelor’s degree of philosophy from Inner Mongolian Normal University (1981), LL.M. from Renmin University of China (1984) and Doctor Juris magna cum laude from the University Hamburg (1993). Since 1984, she works at the Institute of Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS). From 1988 to 1993, she studied in Germany based on Max-Planck Institute for Comparative Private Law. As visiting scholar she spent a year at Max-Planck Institute for Comparative Intellectual Property and Competition Law, and a year at Max-Planck Institute for Comparative Social Law in Munich. In 2004, she was invited to the US by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. In 2005, she was invited to the European Union Visitors Program, and awarded a Fulbright Scholarship to spend a year at the Chicago-Kent College of Law. Prof. Wang works in the areas of economic law, international economic law, and focuses on competition law. Her publications include: Monopoly and Competition in the Chinese Economy — A conception for merger control in China in view of the American and German practices (J C B Mohr, 1993); Monopoly Problem in the Merger of Enterprises (Law Press, 1996); On Competition Law (China’s Legal Publishing House, 1999); Competition Law of European Community (China’s Legal Publishing House, 2001); Economic Law (Social Sciences Academic Press, 2005); Competition Law (Social Sciences Academic Press, 2007). She also has over 200 papers published in Chinese, German and English languages. Prof. Wang has served as vice president of National Association for Economic Law of China, the head of the Consultant Committee for WTO Trade and Competition Policy of the Ministry of Commerce, and member of the Expert Advisory Board for Anti-Monopoly Legislation of the State Council and the National People’s Congress. In her honor, she once lectured on competition law for the Standing Committee of the Ninth and Tenth People’s Congress. In international academic activities, she is a founding member of Academic Society for Competition Law (ASCOLA) and of the Asian Competition Forum, and member of International Advisory Board of the CUTS C-CIER. She lectured on Chinese law at ABA, IBA, IPBA, ACF, Harvard University, Columbia University, Washington University (St. Louis), New York University, KFTC, Chatham House, LIDC, IDRC and other institutions.     

《刑法修正案(七)》第13条之解读

《刑法修正案(七)》第13条的规定可以概括为两个罪名,即"密切关系人受贿罪"和"离职国家工作人员受贿罪"。"密切关系人"包括国家工作人员和离职国家工作人员的近亲属以及其他与之关系密切的人,其范围比"特定关系人"要广,除了近亲属、情妇(夫)和有共同利益的人之外,还可以是同学、老乡、同事、战友、朋友等。其实质在于,行为人基于与国家工作人员的这种关系,能够或者足以影响该国家工作人员或者其他国家工作人员,进而通过该国家工作人员或者其他国家工作人员职务上的行为,为请托人谋取利益,实现与请托人之间的权钱交易行为。由于近亲属等密切关系人和离职国家工作人员既可以构成受贿罪的共犯,也可以独立构成密切关系人受贿罪与离职国家工作人员受贿罪,因此,要将其与斡旋受贿、共同受贿等行为相区别。     

西南地区在全国禁毒斗争中的战略地位和作用

几十年的禁毒实践证明,在全国禁毒人民战争中,西南地区是禁毒的主阵地。其特殊的地理位置确立了它在禁毒斗争中重要的战略地位,是毒品渗透与反渗透的“兵家”必争之地,是中国实施“无国界”禁毒行动的发源地和示范地。因此,在禁毒工作中,西南地区无疑应起到禁毒主力军作用,堵截“毒品通道”的壁垒作用,勇于开拓、创新、敢为人先、率先实践的作用,以为全球禁毒做出积极贡献．     

制约农民有序政治参与的原因分析

改革开放以来,农民的政治参与行为极大促进了农村民主的进程。但是,在农民政治参与过程中,也出现了很多问题,如：农民政治参与的目的主要是维护经济利益、非制度化的政治参与大量存在、发展不平衡等。现阶段,制约农民有序政治参与的原因是多方面的,但主要体现在三方面：一是主体原因,即农民政治素质较低;二是制度原因,即没有形成健全的政治参与民主运行机制和程序;三是环境原因,即农村经济文化水平落后并缺乏良好的政治生活环境。     

Food for Thought: Reflections on a Counter-hegemonic Food-related Intervention in a South African University

Currently the Academy operates primarily as a space that helps to create and cement neoliberal hegemony in the Gramscian sense. However, since hegemony is never complete, universities are a site of struggle and the opportunity exists to engage in a “war of position” within them. This must necessarily involve allowing space for counter-hegemonic discourses to emerge through critical reflection on “common sense” discourses, as well as the deliberate inclusion of counter-hegemonic thinking and theory from below. This article reflects on an attempt to do this in a South African university, the University of KwaZulu-Natal, in relation to the issue of food. The Food Festival was an attempt to subvert interlocking hegemonic discourses, including that of food security, by “reading the world” (à la Freire) in order to understand the actual nature of existing food systems as inherently oppressive, and “inserting” the concept of food sovereignty as developed by the global peasants’ movement La Via Campesina. After considering the counter-hegemonic intentions of the Festival, the article reflects on its uneven success.     

社会主义初级阶段理论探析

社会主义初级阶段是我国现阶段的最大实际。作为马克思主义与中国具体实际相结合的经典标志,社会主义初级阶段理论充分体现了社会发展规律的普遍性和特殊性。其内在理论品质证明了社会主义市场经济存在的合理性,是马克思主义中国化的又一次伟大胜利。     

信托业经营的法律定位与公平竞争

按照我国现行的金融法律框架,金融业实行的是分业经营、分业管理,信托业享有完全独立于银行、证券和保险业的业务专营权。但是,这种专营权逐渐被各种部门规章以＂委托理财＂之名打破,使非信托业事实上都享有了经营信托的权利,再加之信托业自身能力的限制,必然出现业务经营的困境,甚至不得不事实上违规经营。＂委托理财＂实质上是一种非纯粹信托或称准信托,是对现行法律的有意规避,是造成信托业困境和不公平竞争的主要根源。因此,必须明确信托的认定标准,给信托业经营一个合理的法律定位,实现银行业、信托业、证券业、保险业之间基本公平的竞争。     

论贵州在汉帝国的历史地位

今贵州区域在汉代绝大部分属于牂牁郡辖治,两汉时期牂牁郡是汉王朝与西南夷地区联系的重要边郡,郡治设在安顺宁谷一带,都尉治一度曾设在赫章可乐。牂牁郡既是汉帝国控制西南夷和"制越"的前沿阵地,又是汉朝廷通滇、通身毒的"南方丝绸之路"的要区,在汉帝国的版图中占重要地位。通过稳定夜郎区域,汉帝国可以协调西南各族之间纷争的矛盾,可以制约和便于平息反叛,可以加强夜郎区域与周边及中原地区的交流,并且在政治上达到形式上的全国统一,从而保证边郡的稳定。